THE DCIT, 5(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. SANWARIA AGRO OILS LTD., BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for the Section 80IA deduction as they had opted for the correct assessment year and that the taxes paid under Section 43B were deductible as they were actually paid during the year, irrespective of accounting treatment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in solvent extraction and wind power generation, claimed deduction under Section 80IA. The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, and also disallowed a claim under Section 43B for taxes paid but not debited to the profit and loss account.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA when brought forward losses were set off, and whether taxes paid but not debited to P&L are deductible under Section 43B.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. v. ACIT213 citing340 ITR 477 · 2012 · HC
- Associated Pigments Ltd. v. CIT7 citing234 ITR 589 · 1998 · HC
- Chemicals and Plastics India Ltd. v. CIT7 citing260 ITR 193 · 2003 · HC
- Poonawala Estate Stud & Agro Farm (P) Ltd. v. ACIT7 citing136 TTJ 236 · 2011 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI MANISH BORAD
PER MANISH BORAD, AM.
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-I, Bhopal [in short referred to as the CIT (A)] dated 10.03.2015 arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act dated 28.03.2013 framed by the Ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax-1(1), Bhopal pertaining to Assessment Year 2010-11. ITA No.288/Ind/2015 Asst. Year 2010-11
Briefly stated facts as culled out from the records are that the assessee is a limited company engaged in the business of solvent extraction plant and wind power generation. The activities undertaken by the assessee are covered under the category of indust
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026