GOKULAM SEVA NYAS,1 RESHAM KENDRA ,GRAM KHAJURIYA SANWER vs. CIT EXEMPTION BHOPAL, ROOM NO:201,II FLOOR, REAC, BHOPAL, REAC, BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

section 80G. The appeals were filed with a significant delay of 461 days.", "held": "The Tribunal held that while the assessee needs to be prompt, in the interest of substantial justice, it is inclined to condone

MADHYA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION,POLOGROUND, INDUSTRIAL STATE vs. EXEMPTION WARD INDORE, MAIN BUILDING, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

80G on a technical ground of selecting the wrong section code is justified, and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned

JWALA MAHILA SAMITI,121 AB SCHEME NO 54 ,VIJAY NAGAR INDORE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurpose

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani\Nand\Nshri Paresh M Joshi\Nita No.578/Ind/2025\Njwala Mahila Samiti,\Nबनाम /\Ncit- Exemption,\N121 Ab Scheme No.54,\Nvs.\Nbhopal\Nvijay Nagar,\Nindore\N(Pan:Aabaj7364C)\N(Assessee/Appellant)\Nassessee By\N(Revenue/Respondent)\Ns/Shri\Npranay Goyal & S.N.\Ngoyal, Ars\Nrevenue By\Ndate Of Hearing\Nshri Anoop Singh, Cit-Dr\N10.11.2025\N14.11.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement\Nआदेश / Order\Nper Paresh M Joshi, J.M:\Nthis Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Under Section 253 Of\Nthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The \"Act\" For\Nsake Of Brevity) Before This Tribunal. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By\Nthe Order Bearing Number\Nitba/Exm/F/Exm45/2024-\N25/1066565769(1) Dated 10.07.2024\Npassed By The Ld.\Ncit(Exemption) Whereby The Application Of The Assessee Filed In\Nthe Form 10Ab For The Grant Of Final Registration U/S 80G(5) Of\Nthe Act Is Rejected, Which Is Hereinafter Referred To As The\N\"Impugned Order\".\N2.\Nfactual Matrix\N2.1 That The Assessee Is A Duly Registered Society Vide\Nregistration No.03/27/03/16648/14 Dated 17.01.2014 Which Is\Nissued By The Society'S Registrar (Firms & Society'S, Indore\Ndivision, Indore). The Said Registration Certificate Is At Page 21 Of\Npaper Book Dated 17.09.2025 Filed By The Assessee Society.\N2.2 The Aims & Object Of The Assessee Society Are At Page-22\Nof The Paper Book Dated 17.09.2025 Which Is Reproduced By Us\Nbelow:\Njwala Mahila Samiti\Nita No.578/Ind/2025\Npage 22\Nप्रारूप क्र. 1\Nसमितियों के पंजीयन हेतु ज्ञापनपत्र\Nदेखिये नियम - 3\Npage 22\N1.\Nसंस्था का नाम\Nज्याला महिला समिति\Nसहायक पंजीयना\N2.\Nसंस्था का कार्यालय\N121-Ab. स्कीम नं.

section 80G(5) if the dominant\npurpose remains charitable, as clarified by CBDT Circular No.\n11/2008 dated 19.12.2008.\n6. That, the impugned order is non-speaking, lacks reasoned\nfindings, and does not reflect proper application of mind. It\nmechanically relies on percentages of revenue from sales without\nexamining the nature and purpose of such receipts OR their\napplication, rendering

MADHYA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION,POLOGROUND, INDUSTRIAL STATE vs. EXEMPTION WARD INDORE, MAIN BUILDING, INDORE

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

80G granted earlier by Central Processing Cell of Income-tax\nDepartment [“CPC”] have also been cancelled. The assessee has raised the\ngrounds as mentioned in respective Appeal Memos (Form No. 36).\n2.\nThe registry has informed that the present appeals are delayed and\ntherefore time-barred. The assessee has filed an application/affidavit for\ncondonation of delay; the same is scanned

SHRI DANDI SEWA ASHRAM,ONKARESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION , BHOPAL

In the result the \"Impugned order\" is set aside as and by\nway of remand back to the file of the Ld

condone the delay. Appeal\nadmitted and taken up for hearing.\n3.2 The Ld. AR has placed on the record of this tribunal PB\ncontaining pages 1 to 67.A one pager chronological table.\nITR-7 for AY 17-18 bearing no:\n567739291300318. Our\nattention was invited to PB Page 23 which is an “order u/s\n154 of the act" dated

WAKEUP FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the grounds of

Bench: Shri Paresh M. Joshi & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.895 & 898/Ind/2024 (Hybrid Hearing) Wakeup Foundation, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 41/411, Jangampura, South Bhopal Rajmohalla, Mp - 452002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaaw9534A (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 6. The facts of the case are that the assessee “Wakeup Foundation, PAN – AAAW9534A” had applied for registration under the new provisions of section 12AB and 80G

WAKEUP FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the grounds of

Bench: Shri Paresh M. Joshi & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.895 & 898/Ind/2024 (Hybrid Hearing) Wakeup Foundation, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 41/411, Jangampura, South Bhopal Rajmohalla, Mp - 452002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaaw9534A (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 6. The facts of the case are that the assessee “Wakeup Foundation, PAN – AAAW9534A” had applied for registration under the new provisions of section 12AB and 80G

LILAWATI WELFARE SOCIETY,UJJAIN vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

section 12AB & 80G(5). Hence, the assessee\nsubsequently filed second appeal relating to approval u/s 80G(5) after a\ndelay. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed an application/affidavit\nfor condonation of delay

LILAWATI WELFARE SOCIETY,UJJAIN vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

section 12AB & 80G(5). Hence, the assessee subsequently filed second appeal relating to approval u/s 80G(5) after a delay. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee has filed an application/affidavit for condonation

RAJESH PRAJAPATI ,UJJAIN vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , UJJAIN

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2013-14 Shri Rajesh Prajapati, A.C.I.T., बनाम/ 15, Naliya Bakhal, Circle 2(1), Ujjain Ujjain Vs. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Alnpp5190Q Assessee By Ms.Sonam Khandelwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 17.07.2023

80G. Page 1 of 12 Shri Rajesh Prajapati, Ujjain, Assessment year 2013-14 2. Heard the learned Representatives of both sides at length and case- records perused. 3. The Registry has informed that as per Form No. 36 filed by assessee- appellant, the impugned order dated 16.08.2017 was served upon assessee on 25.08.2017. Therefore, this appeal must have been filed

MADHYA PRADESH ANUSUCHIT JAATI JAN JAATI EVAM PICHHADA VARG KALYAN SANGH,UJJAIN vs. EXEMPTION, UJJAIN

sections": [ "253", "12AB", "80G", "12AB(1)(b)(ii)(B)", "80G(5)" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration/approval applications solely on the grounds of non-submission of documents without granting sufficient opportunity, and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned

CORPORATEN AREA BASKETBALL TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION., BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 80G(5) Page 2 of 7 Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023 whereupon the CIT(E) granted provisional approval vide order dated 15.10.2021 for the period from 15.10.2021 to AY 2024-25. Thereafter, the assessee sought final approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) and for this purpose, filed application dated 29.09.2022 to CIT(E). However

CORPORATEN AREA BASKETBALL TRUST,INDORE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 80G(5) Page 2 of 7 Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023 whereupon the CIT(E) granted provisional approval vide order dated 15.10.2021 for the period from 15.10.2021 to AY 2024-25. Thereafter, the assessee sought final approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) and for this purpose, filed application dated 29.09.2022 to CIT(E). However