AATMA PRAKASH MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and held that the CIT(E) had misinterpreted the provision regarding the time limit for filing the application for final approval under Section 80G(5). The Tribunal directed the CIT(E) to reconsider the application on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a not-for-profit company promoting mental health awareness, applied for final approval under Section 80G(5). The CIT(E) rejected the application as time-barred, citing a misinterpretation of the statutory time limit for filing after provisional approval.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for final approval under Section 80G(5) was filed within the prescribed time limit, and whether the CIT(E) correctly interpreted the statutory provisions and subsequent CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy368 citing7 SCC 123 · 1998 · SC
- Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax137 citing31 ITR 28 · 1957 · SC
- CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull97 citing53 ITR 574 · 1964 · SC
- CIT v. Parma Nand81 citing135 Taxmann 100 · 2004 · HC
- Udhavdas Kewalram v. CIT59 citing66 ITR 462 · 1967 · SC
- Ram Nath Sahu & Others v. Gobardhan Sao and Others43 citing3 SCC 195 · 2002
- Esthuri Aswathiah v. CIT, Mysore29 citing66 ITR 478 · 1967 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Baba Avtar Singh17 citing83 ITR 738 · 1972 · HC
- DCIT(Exemption) v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission17 citing30 Taxmann.com 41 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- 266 ITR 255/135 Taxman 100 (Delhi) and (ii) CIT v. ITOCHU Corpn11 citing139 Taxmann 348 · 2004 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] by which the assessee’s application for grant of final approval u/s 80G(5) of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected and the provisional approval u/s 80G(5) granted earlier has also been cancelled.
The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the assessee is incorporated on 29.10.2016 u/s 8 of Companies Act, 2013 as a Aatma Prakash Mental Health Foundation, Indore. not-for-profit company, engaged in charitable purpose of promoting mental-
health awareness. On assessee’s applications,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026