CORPORATEN AREA BASKETBALL TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION., BHOPAL
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
आदेश / O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
The captioned two appeals are filed by assessee. The details of appeals are as under:
(i) I.T.A. No. 447/Ind/2023 is an appeal directed against order dated 30.06.2022 passed by Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] by which the assessee’s application dated 28.01.2020 for grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
(ii) I.T.A. No. 77/Ind/2023 is an appeal directed against order dated 24.01.2023 passed by same CIT(E) by which the assessee’s
Page 1 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
application dated 29.09.2022 in Form No. 10AB for grant of final approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) under the new provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected as also the provisional approval granted earlier vide order dated 15.10.2021 has been cancelled.
Since these appeals relate to the same assessee and the controversy
in both cases relates to grant of approval u/s 80G(5)(vi), they were heard
together and are being disposed of by this common order.
At the outset, we may take note of the background facts leadings to
these two appeals. The assessee claims to be a trust engaged in charitable
activity and having registration from Income-tax Department u/s 12A vide
order dated 30.09.2019 effective from AY 2019-20. The first appeal is such
that the assessee sought approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) from AY 2020-21 onwards
and for this purpose, filed application dated 28.01.2020 to CIT(E). However,
vide order dated 17.08.2020, the CIT(E) rejected assessee’s application.
Against this order, the assessee went in appeal before ITAT, Indore Bench
whereupon the ITAT, vide order dated 21.12.2021 in ITA No.
284/Ind/2020, remanded matter to the CIT(E) for consideration afresh.
Pursuant to ITAT’s direction, the CIT(E) passed order dated 30.06.2022
wherein he again rejected assessee’s application on merit with certain
reasonings. The assessee has now challenged this order dated 30.06.2022
before us in ITA No. 474/Ind/2023. The second appeal is such that the
assessee filed an application to CIT(E) for grant of provisional approval u/s
80G(5)(vi) in terms of Clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5)
Page 2 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
whereupon the CIT(E) granted provisional approval vide order dated
15.10.2021 for the period from 15.10.2021 to AY 2024-25. Thereafter, the
assessee sought final approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) and for this purpose, filed
application dated 29.09.2022 to CIT(E). However, vide order dated
24.01.2023, the CIT(E) rejected assessee’s application. The assessee has
now challenged this order in ITA No. 77/Ind/2023.
I.T.A. No. 447/Ind/2023:
The Registry has informed that this appeal has been filed on
16.11.2023 against order dated 30.06.2022 which is after a delay of 1 year
and 76 days (the assessee has mentioned a delay of 470 days in
condonation application) and therefore time-barred. Ld. AR for assessee
submitted that the assessee has filed a condonation-application, the same is
scanned and re-produced below:
Page 3 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
Page 4 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
Referring to the averments made by assessee in above application, Ld.
AR submitted that in the course of preparation of ITA No. 77/Ind/2023, the
assessee was advised by counsel to also prefer appeal against the order
dated 30.06.2022 passed by CIT(E), this has resulted in a delay of 470 days
in filing ITA No. 447/Ind/2023. Ld. AR then submitted that the delay is
unintentional and without any malafide intention, hence the same must be
condoned and this appeal be admitted for hearing. Ld. DR for revenue
strongly opposed the assessee’s application and submitted that the delay of
470 days is inordinate. He further submitted that the filing of appeal after a
delay of 470 days is just an after-though of assessee. He submitted that the
reason advanced by assessee does not justify condonation. He prayed to
dismiss assessee’s request.
After a careful consideration we find that the ITA No. 447/Ind/2023
and ITA No. 77/Ind/2023 are very much different although seemingly they
are same because both of them deal with rejection of approval u/s
80G(5)(vi). While the ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 relates to grant of approval from
AY 2020-21, the ITA No. 77/Ind/2023 relates to revocation of provisional
approval for the period from 15.10.2021 to AY 2024-25 and also grant of
final approval for that period under new provisions introduced in section
80G(5) from 01.04.2021. Therefore, the approvals sought in these appeals
are for different periods, under different provisions and will have different
implications; there is no co-relation of two appeals. That apart, the assessee
filed ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 on 16.11.2023 whereas he had already filed ITA
Page 5 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
No. 77/Ind/2023 on 13.03.2023. Therefore, for the continuing delay for a
lengthy period from 13.03.2023 to 16.11.2023 has no valid explanation. For
these reasons, we are not inclined to condone the delay. Consequently, the
ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 is not admitted, the same is dismissed being time-
barred.
I.T.A. No. 77/Ind/2023:
We have carefully perused the impugned order passed by CIT(E). We
find that firstly in Para No. 2, the CIT(E) has re-produced the show-cause
notice dated 03.01.2023 issued by him to assessee. Thereafter, in next para
No. 3, he has mentioned that the assessee has filed adjournment
application dated 09.01.2023 in response to his notice, therefore notice
was again issued on 11.01.2023 and hearing was fixed on 19.01.2023 with
final opportunity but the assessee has neither filed any information/
documents nor submitted any reply. Then, in next Para 4, the CIT(E) has
rejected assessee’s application. Therefore, the CIT(E) has rejected
assessee’s application because of non-compliance by assessee without
making any adjudication on merit. In the situation, to meet the end of
justice and fair play, we feel it appropriate to give one more opportunity to
assessee-trust considering the fact that it is registered u/s 12A and
claiming to be engaged in charitable activity. Accordingly, we re-store this
matter back to CIT(E) for passing order afresh after giving necessary
hearing to assessee. Needless to mention that the CIT(E) shall pass an
Page 6 of 7
Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 & ITA No. 77/Ind/2023
appropriate order after considering assessee’s submission without being
influenced by his previous order. The assessee is also directed to make
representation in the hearings fixed by CIT(E) failing which the CIT(E) shall
be at liberty to pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
Resultantly, ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 is dismissed and ITA No.
77/Ind/2023 is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 29.05.2024
Sd/- sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore िदनांक / Dated : 29.05.2024 CPU/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 7 of 7
