BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(i)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai497Delhi392Ahmedabad372Pune310Chennai265Jaipur223Kolkata210Bangalore201Surat89Hyderabad87Chandigarh72Rajkot71Amritsar53Lucknow51Indore46Visakhapatnam40Nagpur40Cuttack31Cochin22Raipur18Agra17Jodhpur15Jabalpur12Karnataka11Ranchi10Panaji10Allahabad8Patna7Calcutta5Dehradun5Telangana4SC2Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Varanasi2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A221Section 80G95Section 80G(5)79Exemption40Section 80G(5)(vi)20Section 12A(1)(ac)12Section 1111Section 1010Natural Justice10

RATLAM AHINSA SHIKSHA SAMITI,RATLAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) , BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is allowed accordingly and the Id

ITA 719/IND/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 80G(5)

Charitable Trust, Mumbai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ITAT No. 5111/Mum/2024, order dated 29.11.2024: "6. The assessee in terms of the above provisions first applied for a provisional approval under sub-clause (B) of clause (iv) of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

Section 143(3)8
Charitable Trust7
Addition to Income6
ITA 139/IND/2023[00]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
19 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G: Page 5 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust, Indore. Vs. CIT(E), ITA No.138 & 139/Ind/2023 “Section 80G: (5

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

ITA 138/IND/2023[00]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Dec 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 11Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G: Page 5 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable Trust, Indore. Vs. CIT(E), ITA No.138 & 139/Ind/2023 “Section 80G: (5

AATMA PRAKASH MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 107/IND/2024[N.A.]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 May 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaatma Prakash Mental Cit (Exemption), Health Foundation, Bhopal बनाम/ 738, Nehru Nagar, Vs. Indore. (Appellant/Assessee) (Respondent/Revenue) Pan: Aaoca9170A Assessee By Shri Apurva Mehta & Shri Rajesh Mehta, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 16.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.05.2024

Section 12ASection 253(5)Section 8Section 80G(5)

80G(5) of the Act stating that “whichever is earlier” is applicable only to the newly constructed trust. The findings of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga Charitable Trust (supra) is reproduced below: “10.1 In this background, we need to read the sub-clause (iii) of the Proviso to Section

SANAND NYAS,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 321/IND/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Nov 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshisanand Nyas Cit(Exemption) 417 Trade House, 14/3 Bhopal बनाम/ South Tukoganj, Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aacts5253M Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Revenue By Shri Anoop Singh, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 19.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28.11.2025

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable activities before seeking provisional approval under Clause (iv) to First Proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act would ever be entitled to grant of final registration under Clause (iii) to First Proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act even after grant of provisional approval, which would make the relevant provisions of section 80G(5) otiose and defeat

SHRIDHAR GYAN PRASAR PARMARTHIK TRUST, RAJGAD,RAJGAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, assessee’s appeal in 9

ITA 706/IND/2017[00]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Aug 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Shri Shridhar Gyan Prasar Parmarthik Trust Rajgad Pan :Aafts0410D : Appellant

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Ors., (supra) has held the following in relation to the provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act, qua approval u/s 80G(5

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

ITA 232/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 115BSection 143(3)

charitable trust as mentioned in section 115BBC (2) of the Act and hence provisions of sub-section (1) of the section 115BBC of the Act are squarely applicable in the case of the assessee as in case of the assessee, anonymous donations as per section 115BBC(3) has been found. 4.40 Without any prejudice to the above, it is also

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

ITA 776/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 115BSection 143(3)

charitable trust as mentioned in section 115BBC (2) of the Act and hence provisions of sub-section (1) of the section 115BBC of the Act are squarely applicable in the case of the assessee as in case of the assessee, anonymous donations as per section 115BBC(3) has been found. 4.40 Without any prejudice to the above, it is also

BALAJI GAU SANRAKSHAN SANSTHAN,VIDISHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 890/IND/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Jan 2026
Section 10Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

Charitable Trust, Mumbai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ITAT No. 5111/Mum/2024, order dated 29.11.2024: "6. The assessee in terms of the above provisions first applied for a provisional approval under sub-clause (B) of clause (iv) of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN,CHULGIRI BHOPAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, Assessee’s appeal

ITA 287/IND/2020[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Jan 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ab)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G(5)(vi) of the Act. 8. We note that the trust was registered under section 12A of the Act since 13.12.1990 vide registration no.90-91. Till the insertion of Sec 12A(1)(ab) by Finance Act 2017, there was no statutory requirement of intimating the changes to the Income-tax Department. The objects were amended in F.Y. 2016-17, when

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN,BHOPAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, Assessee’s appeal

ITA 289/IND/2020[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Jan 2022

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ab)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G(5)(vi) of the Act. 8. We note that the trust was registered under section 12A of the Act since 13.12.1990 vide registration no.90-91. Till the insertion of Sec 12A(1)(ab) by Finance Act 2017, there was no statutory requirement of intimating the changes to the Income-tax Department. The objects were amended in F.Y. 2016-17, when

M/S. RISHIRAJ K.M.B. EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE CIT, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 434/IND/2014[-]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Aug 2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: Na

Section 11Section 12ASection 132(1)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

5. "कूल, कॉलेज तथा अ"य "कार के सा"ह"य एवं सां"कृ"तक ग"त"व"धय" म" या समाज सेवा म" मह"वपूण" काय" मे लगे "यि"तय" क" आ"थ"क मदद करना, स"मा"नत करना, पा"रतो"षक एवं "कॉलर"शप "दान करना आ"द । 6. "श"ा एवं सं"कृ"त के "चार के

CORPORATEN AREA BASKETBALL TRUST,INDORE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 447/IND/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 May 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 12ASection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) from 01.04.2021. Therefore, the approvals sought in these appeals are for different periods, under different provisions and will have different implications; there is no co-relation of two appeals. That apart, the assessee filed ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 on 16.11.2023 whereas he had already filed ITA Page 5 of 7 Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023

CORPORATEN AREA BASKETBALL TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION., BHOPAL

ITA 77/IND/2023[00]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 May 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 12ASection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

section 80G(5) from 01.04.2021. Therefore, the approvals sought in these appeals are for different periods, under different provisions and will have different implications; there is no co-relation of two appeals. That apart, the assessee filed ITA No. 447/Ind/2023 on 16.11.2023 whereas he had already filed ITA Page 5 of 7 Corporaten Area Basketball Trust, Indore. ITA No. 447/Ind/2023

WAKEUP FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the grounds of

ITA 898/IND/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Paresh M. Joshi & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.895 & 898/Ind/2024 (Hybrid Hearing) Wakeup Foundation, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 41/411, Jangampura, South Bhopal Rajmohalla, Mp - 452002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaaw9534A (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 12ASection 80G

section 12AB and 80G of the Act. Considering the fact that the application of assessee was not considered on merit, we deem it appropriate to direct the CIT(E) to treat the application of assessee on merit and pass the order in accordance with law. Under similar circumstances, the Co-ordinate Benches of ITAT and Hon’ble Orissa High Court

WAKEUP FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the grounds of

ITA 895/IND/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Paresh M. Joshi & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.895 & 898/Ind/2024 (Hybrid Hearing) Wakeup Foundation, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 41/411, Jangampura, South Bhopal Rajmohalla, Mp - 452002 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaaw9534A (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 12ASection 80G

section 12AB and 80G of the Act. Considering the fact that the application of assessee was not considered on merit, we deem it appropriate to direct the CIT(E) to treat the application of assessee on merit and pass the order in accordance with law. Under similar circumstances, the Co-ordinate Benches of ITAT and Hon’ble Orissa High Court

MOHANLAL RAMNARAYAN KHANDELWAL FOUNDATION,GANDHWANI vs. CIT(EXMPETION), BHOPAL

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 531/IND/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jun 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

trust and the genuineness of the activities carried out. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable law. Ld CIT(Exemption), Bhopal erred in rejecting the application filed u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) by reference to the provisions of section 80G(5) which is grossly incorrect. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable

MOHANLAL RAMNARAYAN KHANDELWAL FOUNDATION,GANDHWANI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 532/IND/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jun 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

trust and the genuineness of the activities carried out. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable law. Ld CIT(Exemption), Bhopal erred in rejecting the application filed u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) by reference to the provisions of section 80G(5) which is grossly incorrect. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable

SARVABHAOOM HINDU DHARAM SRICHOBEES AVTAR TATWAGYAN MANDIR TRUST DEPALPUR,INDORE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 810/IND/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Aug 2025

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshisarvabhaoom Hindu Cit (Exemption) Dharam Srichobees Avtar Bhopal Tatwagyan Mandir Trust, बनाम/ Depalpur, Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaets4230L Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Raghunath, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 26.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28.08.2025

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)

Trust 4. Ld. AR for assessee at first drew us to Para 6 of impugned order and showed that the Ld. CIT(E) has observed that assessee is a ‘religious entity’ and therefore in terms of section 80G(5)(ii) read with Explanation-3 to section 80G, the assessee is not eligible for approval u/s 80G(5). He, however, submitted

M/S MAYANK BIDASRIA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT-E, INDORE

In the result, both the appeal of assessee in ITANo

ITA 625/IND/2016[-]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

charitable the grounds raised in the present appeal are dismissed. Now we take assessee’s appeal in ITANo.625/Ind/2016 The assessee has raised following grounds: “That the Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the assessee’s application under section 80G(5). 2. That ld. CIT(E) erred in relying upon the report of Inspector who failed to appreciate the help extended