ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

charitable purposes as mandated by Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and hence the exemption granted to it u/s 11 is being denied. Thus, the income of the assessee as per its income and expenditure statement amounting to Rs.9,03,81,292/- is being added to its returned income. [Addition: Rs. 9,03,81,292/-] Penalty provisions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

charitable purposes as mandated by Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and hence the exemption granted to it u/s 11 is being denied. Thus, the income of the assessee as per its income and expenditure statement amounting to Rs.9,03,81,292/- is being added to its returned income. [Addition: Rs. 9,03,81,292/-] Penalty provisions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

charitable purposes as mandated by Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and hence the exemption granted to it u/s 11 is being denied. Thus, the income of the assessee as per its income and expenditure statement amounting to Rs.9,03,81,292/- is being added to its returned income. [Addition: Rs. 9,03,81,292/-] Penalty provisions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

charitable purposes as mandated by Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and hence the exemption granted to it u/s 11 is being denied. Thus, the income of the assessee as per its income and expenditure statement amounting to Rs.9,03,81,292/- is being added to its returned income. [Addition: Rs. 9,03,81,292/-] Penalty provisions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

charitable purposes as mandated by Section 11 of the Income Tax Act and hence the exemption granted to it u/s 11 is being denied. Thus, the income of the assessee as per its income and expenditure statement amounting to Rs.9,03,81,292/- is being added to its returned income. [Addition: Rs. 9,03,81,292/-] Penalty provisions

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C.V. Bhadang, Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunatha

138 taxman.com 416 (Guj). She further submitted that a claim for deduction under Section 80IA, in the original return filed under Section 139(1) is also mandatorily required to be supported by an audit report as prescribed under Rule 18BBB and in Form 10CCB and such audit report should be filed along with the return of income in order

INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SYSTEMS,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXCEPTION-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiah & Shri V. Durga Raoassessment Year: 2014-15 Institute Of Health Systems, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Exemptions – 2, Hyderabad. Pan – Aaati 0679P

138/- and expenses incurred Rs. 4,36,500/-. From the above, it is very clear that assessee society is not working for the profit and it is only collecting fees for the services rendered. In view of the above observations, we are of the opinion that assessee’s services cannot be considered as commercial activity. The assessee, in fact