BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

396 results for “reassessment”+ Section 133clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai602Delhi396Kolkata198Jaipur186Bangalore132Ahmedabad110Chennai86Chandigarh69Raipur62Pune56Hyderabad52Surat42Patna41Indore39Guwahati37Ranchi30Agra28Nagpur22Lucknow21Visakhapatnam21Allahabad20Rajkot20Cuttack14Amritsar13Cochin10Dehradun9Jodhpur4Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 147141Section 148112Addition to Income78Section 143(3)69Section 6858Section 153A56Reassessment49Reopening of Assessment37Section 69A28Section 263

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2442/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

Showing 1–20 of 396 · Page 1 of 20

...
23
Section 14421
Search & Seizure12

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2443/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, NEW DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS P.LTD, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 200/DEL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

DCIT, CC-20, DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS PVT. LTD., DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2444/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS PVT. LTD, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2445/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

COSMIC INFORMATICS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2444/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

COSMIC INFORMATICS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in appeal No

ITA 2443/DEL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.2442 To 2445/Del/2023 (Assessment Years 2013-14 To 2016-17) Dcit, Lotus Herbals Pvt. Ltd., Cc-20, Delhi. Room No.269A, 2 Nd Floor, Ara Vs. Centre, E-2, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Pan-Aaacl0198F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rohit Jain, Adv. & Shri Shivam Gupta, Ca Department By Sh. Mukesh Jha, Cit Dr & Ms. Pooja Swroop, Cit-Dr 29.09.2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 23.12.2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: These Are Five Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All Are Dated 12.06.2023 For Assessment Years As Tabulated As Under:

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

reassessment proceedings beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, where the assessment has been previously undertaken under section 143(3) of the Act unless the income has escaped assessment by reason of the "failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment" In the present case, during

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 4362/DEL/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 4363/DEL/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 4365/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 4364/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANIPAT vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD., PANIPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 5172/DEL/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANIPAT vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD., PANIPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 5173/DEL/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANIPAT vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD., PANIPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 5175/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANIPAT vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD., PANIPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 5176/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANIPAT vs. KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD., PANIPAT

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 5174/DEL/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

KUNDAN RICE MILLS LTD.,PANIPAT vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, KARNAL

In the result, assessee’s appeals are allowed, whereas,

ITA 4366/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

133(6) as well as summons under section 131 of the Act, as, the concerned parties were never found. Thus, she submitted, the identity of the parties remained unverifiable. She submitted, since, the survey operation was carried out along with search operation, wherein genuineness of sales made to M/s. Dee Kay Trade Centre and M/s. J.S. Enterprises could

WACHOVIA MARKETING PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-27(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 847/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Kaushik, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

sections could not have been charged and included in the computation of tax demand. 4. The order appealed against is contrary to facts, law and principles of natural justice.” 5. The case file reveals that there is a delay of 6 days in filing the appeal. Assessee has filed a letter explaining the reasons which lead to the delay

RAJESH BATRA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 29(1), DELHI

In the result ITA No.4420/Del/2025 is allowed

ITA 4419/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shrimahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.4419, 4420 & 4421/Del/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years:2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 बनाम Shri Rajesh Batra, Income Tax Officer, B-96, Shivalik, New Delhi. Vs. Ward 29(1), Pan No.Aahpb4919N Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 01Section 148Section 149(1)Section 149(1)(b)Section 250

133 (Del) (pages 32 – 52 of the Paper Book). A tabular chart in support of contention of appellant is as under: S.No. Particulars Appellant’s Rajeev Ram Balram 6848/Mum/2024 case (page Bansal 469 Buildhome dated of Paper ITR 46(SC) (P) Ltd. 27.02.2025 Md. Book) Para 111 (pages 32 – Salim Abdul 52 of PB) Hakim Khan vs. ITO i) Assessment

RAJESH BATRA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 29(1), DELHI

In the result ITA No.4420/Del/2025 is allowed

ITA 4421/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shrimahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.4419, 4420 & 4421/Del/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years:2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16 बनाम Shri Rajesh Batra, Income Tax Officer, B-96, Shivalik, New Delhi. Vs. Ward 29(1), Pan No.Aahpb4919N Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 01Section 148Section 149(1)Section 149(1)(b)Section 250

133 (Del) (pages 32 – 52 of the Paper Book). A tabular chart in support of contention of appellant is as under: S.No. Particulars Appellant’s Rajeev Ram Balram 6848/Mum/2024 case (page Bansal 469 Buildhome dated of Paper ITR 46(SC) (P) Ltd. 27.02.2025 Md. Book) Para 111 (pages 32 – Salim Abdul 52 of PB) Hakim Khan vs. ITO i) Assessment