BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

20 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 73clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna484Chennai466Mumbai401Bangalore307Delhi260Kolkata222Pune144Karnataka131Ahmedabad123Chandigarh122Hyderabad108Jaipur103Visakhapatnam75Surat48Amritsar47Calcutta46Indore44Lucknow31Cochin27Rajkot21Cuttack21Dehradun20Nagpur19Guwahati14Raipur13SC13Panaji12Agra12Telangana11Allahabad8Varanasi6Jabalpur4Orissa3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Jodhpur2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 234E121Section 200A22Section 200A(1)(c)11Section 20011Section 200A(1)11TDS11Section 153A10Condonation of Delay9Section 148

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN vs. SWARNGANGA CONSTRUCTION P.LTD, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 186/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Rao

For Appellant: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Sh. Kapil Goel, Advocate
Section 144Section 153CSection 249(3)Section 250(4)Section 271(1)(c)

section 144 and penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act respectively for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. In the quantum appeal, the assessee raised following grounds : “1. On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in condoning the delay of more than 2 years merely on ground that the erstwhile

7
Section 142(1)6
Addition to Income6
Search & Seizure5

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 72/DDN/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

73 & 41/DDN/2025 SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Vs. DCIT/ACIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘DEHRADUN/’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 70/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 71/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 72/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 73/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2014-15) I.T.A

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 73/DDN/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

73 & 41/DDN/2025 SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Vs. DCIT/ACIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘DEHRADUN/’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 70/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 71/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 72/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 73/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2014-15) I.T.A

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 71/DDN/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

73 & 41/DDN/2025 SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Vs. DCIT/ACIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘DEHRADUN/’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 70/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 71/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 72/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 73/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2014-15) I.T.A

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 70/DDN/2025[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

73 & 41/DDN/2025 SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Vs. DCIT/ACIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘DEHRADUN/’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 70/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 71/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 72/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 73/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2014-15) I.T.A

SSGR HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 41/DDN/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

73 & 41/DDN/2025 SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Vs. DCIT/ACIT IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘DEHRADUN/’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 70/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 71/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 72/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 73/DDN/2025 (A.Y 2014-15) I.T.A

SHRI VIBHU GROVER,KOTDWARA vs. PCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalvibhu Grover, Pcit, M/S Grover Sales Corporation, Dehradun. Garage Road, Kotdwara, Vs. Pauri-246169 Pan:Agdpg5842R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Anil Jain, Adv. Department By Shri S.K. Chaterjee, Cit-Dr

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263

Delay condoned. This special leave petition is misconceived and is completely contrary to the law pertaining to Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The notice under Section 148 of the 1961 Act referred to two reasons. The first reason was with regard to non-declaration of the account in ING Vysya Bank with a credit of Rs.70

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 215/DDN/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 216/DDN/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A),, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 195/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 217/DDN/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 196/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), , HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 209/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDEANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 210/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 211/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HLDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 212/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HLDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

KUNWAR TOSEEN,KOTDWAR DISTT. PAURI GARHWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , KOTDWAR

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 179/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 271A

73,750/- in one or more accounts of cash deposits and assessee did not file return of income. After recording reasons, the case was reopened by issue of notice under Section 148 of the Act on 25.03.2023 with prior approval of the DCIT, Dehradun. Despite intimation letter dated 17.08.2022, multiple notices under Sections 142(1) dated 26.09.2022, 01.11.2022, letter dated

KUNWAR TOSEEN,KOTDWAR DISTT. PAURI GARHWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOTDWAR

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 178/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 271A

73,750/- in one or more accounts of cash deposits and assessee did not file return of income. After recording reasons, the case was reopened by issue of notice under Section 148 of the Act on 25.03.2023 with prior approval of the DCIT, Dehradun. Despite intimation letter dated 17.08.2022, multiple notices under Sections 142(1) dated 26.09.2022, 01.11.2022, letter dated