BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

31 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 30clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,255Chennai1,158Delhi1,051Kolkata651Bangalore491Ahmedabad436Pune393Hyderabad391Jaipur353Patna231Chandigarh190Karnataka185Nagpur155Surat152Lucknow137Indore130Raipur123Amritsar122Rajkot108Visakhapatnam106Cuttack71Cochin62Agra53Panaji50Calcutta49SC41Dehradun31Guwahati30Jodhpur27Allahabad24Varanasi22Jabalpur21Telangana21Kerala5Orissa5Rajasthan5Himachal Pradesh3Ranchi3Andhra Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 234E121Section 200A22Section 143(3)15Addition to Income15Section 153C12Section 153A11Section 200A(1)(c)11Section 20011Section 200A(1)

SURENDRA SINGH,HARIDWAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE, HARIDWAR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3094/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shrir.K. Panda & Shri N. K. Choudhry(Through Video Conferencing) Surendra Singh, Vs. Dcit, Gali No. 1, Subhash Nagar, Circle, Haridwar Jwalapur, Ramesh Varampuram, Hardwar Pan: Barps1918M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Poonam Sharma
Section 144Section 250(6)Section 68Section 69

30 lakhs u/s 69 of the Act on account of purchase of immovable property by the Assessee. 3. Against the said additions the Assessee filed an appeal before the ld. Commissioner. It appears from the impugned order that the Assesseeon various dates failed to appear before the ld. Commissioner to prosecute its appeal and later on after engaging new counsel

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

11
TDS11
Condonation of Delay9
Limitation/Time-bar8

NARENDER KUMAR JAIN,RISHIKESH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 35/DDN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Poonam Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 143Section 249

Section 249 (2) of the Act, the appeal shall be presented within 30 days to the CIT (A). The assessee has preferred the appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 352 days. The assessee has claimed that, the assessee could not file the appeal due to his lack of knowledge and after receiving the assessment order

NARENDER KUMAR JAIN,RISHIKESH vs. THE INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 36/DDN/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Poonam Sharma, Sr.DR
Section 143Section 249

Section 249 (2) of the Act, the appeal shall be presented within 30 days to the CIT (A). The assessee has preferred the appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 352 days. The assessee has claimed that, the assessee could not file the appeal due to his lack of knowledge and after receiving the assessment order

SH. SANJAY KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(3), DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 84/DDN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Sanjay Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer, 34 34Shankerpurhukumatpur Ward 1(2)(3), Dehradun, 248197, Uttarakhand, Uttarakhand Pan: Aaubpk4159P Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Rajiv Sahini, Ca Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Jcit, Dr Date Of Hearing 11/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2025

Section 143(3)Section 69

delay of 167 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 15/12/2018 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making an addition of Rs. 27,30

NANDAN SINGH,PITHORAGARH vs. CIT(A), NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the appellant/assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 185/DDN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2019-20 Nandan Singh, Vs. Cit(Appeals)/National Payya Pauri, Faceless Appeal Pithoragarh Cemtre(Nfac) Assessment Uttarakhand Centre, Pan No. Bfaps4805M Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri SK Ahuja, ARFor Respondent: Shri Amarpal Singh Sr. DR
Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144B(1)Section 147Section 148

condonation of delay of 30 days in filing appeal and appeal filed by the appellant/assessee are against order dated 09.08.2024 of Learned Commissioner of Income- Tax(Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”)/National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi arising out of order dated 29.12.2023 of National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. AO”) under Section

ANNU KUMAR,ROORKEE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DERHADUN

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 79/DDN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Annu Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, C/O. Hemant Arora & Co. Subhash Road, Llp 354-B, 30 Civil Lines, Dehradun, Roorkee Roorkee, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Pan: Bttpk3087N Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Pavitra Arora, Ca Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/07/2025 Order

Section 144Section 144B

30 Civil Lines, Dehradun, Roorkee Roorkee, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand PAN: BTTPK3087N Appellant Respondent Assessee by Sh. Pavitra Arora, CA Revenue by Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 10/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 10/07/2025 ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals/ National Faceless

GUNJAN JAISWAL,HALDWANI vs. ITO, HALDWANI

In the result, the Appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 117/DDN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 271(1)(C)Section 69A

Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making an addition of Rs. 1,22,00,000/- u/s 69A of the Act. Consequent to the said assessment order, an order of penalty also came to be passed u/s 271(1)(C) of the Act on 21/09/2022. Aggrieved by the assessment order as well as order

GUNJAN JAISWAL,HALDWANI vs. ITO, WARD-2(1)(1), HALDWANI

In the result, the Appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 116/DDN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 271(1)(C)Section 69A

Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making an addition of Rs. 1,22,00,000/- u/s 69A of the Act. Consequent to the said assessment order, an order of penalty also came to be passed u/s 271(1)(C) of the Act on 21/09/2022. Aggrieved by the assessment order as well as order

GYANENDRA PANWAR,DEHRADUN vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 238/DDN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun11 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shr Sanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.238/Ddn/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2017-18 बनाम Gyanendra Panwar, Assistant Director Of Income Nanda Devi Enclave, Badripur, Vs. Tax, Cpc,Ito,Ward 1(3)(4), Dehradun-248005, Uttarakhand. Aaykar Bhawan, 16, Civil Lines, Pan No.Adipp2853R Near Iit Roorkee, Uttarakhand. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

30. The assessee was further under treatment for prostate issues at Max Healthcare, Noida. Prescription dated 15.02.2025 is enclosed at page no. 31. The appellant was under treatment at Kailash Hospital, Dehradun. The OPD prescription dated 20.06.2025 and 24.06.2025 are enclosed for ready reference at page no. 31- 23, 5. Treatment of Mother: The mother of the appellant, Smt. Savitri

SH. IRSHAD ILAHI,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, W- 1(3), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 80/DDN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2014-15 Irshad Ilahi, Income Tax Officer, 96 Colli Camp, Turner Road, Ward-1(3), Clement Town, Dehradun, Vs Dehradun Uttarkhand-248001 Pan-Acmpi0814J Appellant Respondent

Section 144Section 147Section 250

condoned and his order may set-aside the matter may be restored to the file of the AO for considering the new submissions/evidences and decide the matter afresh. The assessee filed a written submission explaining the reasons of delay as under:- “1. That the Appellant is a semi literate Muslim Lady who was 67 years at the time

RAJESH AGGARWAL,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 205/DDN/2019[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Rajesh Aggarwal, Vs. Dcit, B-4, New Sabzi Mandi, Vikash Central Circle, Nagar, Distti. Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aanpa7592E Assessee By : Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Revenue By: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 15/09/2023

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sahni, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. 4. We have heard the rival submission and perused the material available on record. It is pertinent to note that this tribunal has already decided the appeal of the assessee up to AY 2016-17 vide its order dated 23.06.2023 wherein, all the appeals of the assessee

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 211/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A),, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 195/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 196/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), , HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 209/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDEANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 210/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HLDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 212/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 215/DDN/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HLDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,BIJNOR RURAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), HALDWANI

In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 214/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Feb 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2014-15 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2017-18 With Assessment Year: 2018-19 With Assessment Year: 2019-20

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

condone the delay in filing the appeals and admit them for adjudication on merits. As stated earlier, the common dispute in all these appeals relates to levy of fee under section 234E of the Act for default in furnishing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statements within the prescribed time limit. 4. Briefly the facts are, while processing TDS statements furnished