BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “depreciation”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi328Mumbai199Bangalore113Jaipur47Chennai28Ahmedabad27Kolkata14Ranchi13Lucknow13Hyderabad10Indore8Pune7Dehradun7Guwahati6Nagpur4Surat3Rajkot3SC3Agra2Jodhpur2Patna2Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1Cochin1Chandigarh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)24Addition to Income22Section 13220Section 153A20Section 14218Disallowance18Search & Seizure15Section 4012Section 234A10Section 142(1)

ACIT, MADURAI vs. G.SHANMUGARAJ (HUF), SIVAKASI

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 947/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri S.S. Godara

For Appellant: Shri. Durgesh Sumrott, IRS, CITFor Respondent: Shri. K.V. Raman, C.A
Section 132(4)(b)Section 132(5)Section 132BSection 132B(1)(i)Section 143(3)Section 234A

234A, 234B and 234C has to be calculated when the provisions of Section 132B provide for adjustment of cash seized only against the existing liability and such existing liability arises on completion of the assessment and demand is created’’. 3. The facts of the case as narrated in ITA No.947/2014 is as below. There was a search conducted

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 143(2)8
Depreciation8

ACIT, MADURAI vs. A.N.PALANISAMY (HUF), SIVAKASI

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 1759/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri S.S. Godara

For Appellant: Shri. Durgesh Sumrott, IRS, CITFor Respondent: Shri. K.V. Raman, C.A
Section 132(4)(b)Section 132(5)Section 132BSection 132B(1)(i)Section 143(3)Section 234A

234A, 234B and 234C has to be calculated when the provisions of Section 132B provide for adjustment of cash seized only against the existing liability and such existing liability arises on completion of the assessment and demand is created’’. 3. The facts of the case as narrated in ITA No.947/2014 is as below. There was a search conducted

SANTECH SOLUTONS PVT LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as 9

ITA 1036/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Dec 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Abraham P.George & Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1036/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2008-2009

For Appellant: Shri. D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, IRS, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 28

depreciation for deduction of ₹1,50,74,601/- in place of ₹6,44,589/- is not admissible’’. Thus, the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn is that ld. Assessing Officer, while framing the original assessment was aware of the recovery of "1,05,93,698/- made by the assessee on its semi finished M/s. Health Q Software product from

TAMILNADU SMALL AND TINY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1415/CHNY/2024[2015-16`]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1415/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2015-16 Tamilnadu Small & Tiny Industries The Income Tax Officer Association, Vs. (Exemptions), No.10, Gst Road, Guindy, Ward-4, Chennai – 600 032. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatt 2207J]

For Appellant: Shri T.Banusekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

depreciation of Rs.4,53,727/- made y the Assessing Officer for the reason that the appellant has already claimed the cost price of the capital assets (purchased in earlier accounting years) as application of income in such years. Levy of interest under sections 234A

DCIT, CC-2(1),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. SNJ DISTILLERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2703/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

SNJ DISTILLERS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2195/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

SNJ DISTILLERS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2194/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

DCIT, CC-2(1),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. SNJ DISTILLERS PVT. LTD.,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2705/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

SNJ DISTILLERS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2993/CHNY/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

DCIT, CC-2(1),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. SNJ DISTILLERS PVT. LTD.,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for Asst

ITA 2704/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Nov 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2703, 2704, 2705/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15,2015-16 & 2016-17) The Dcit, Vs M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Central Circle 2(1), Old No.47, New No.99, Chennai – 600 034. Canal Bank Road, Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.2194, 2195 & 2993/Chny/2019, ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Vs The Acit, M/S. Snj Distillers Pvt. Ltd. Old No.47, New No.99, Central Circle 2(1), Canal Bank Road, Chennai – 600 034. Cit Nagar, Nandanam, Chenani – 600 035. Pan: Aalcs9312F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रतीक" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D. Anand, Advocate : राज"कीओरसे /Revenue By Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit : सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 13.10.2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.11.2020

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand, Advocate
Section 132Section 139Section 143(1)Section 14ASection 234A

234A, 234B and 234C of the Act. 6. The Appellant craves leave to file additional grounds/arguments at the time of hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of distillery products. The assessee company manufactured and sold goods only to Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation

PLR TEXTILES LTD.,CHENNAI vs. THE ACIT ,CORPORATE CIRCLE-5(2), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 133/CHNY/2021[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Mar 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 133/Chny/2021 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06 Plr Textiles Ltd., The Acit, 8K, Century Plaza, V. Corporate Circle -5(2), 560-562, Mount Road, Chennai – 641 034. Chennai – 600 018. [Pan: Aaacp-6536-D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/Appellant By : Mr. R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Ms. Anitha, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27.03.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Filed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Chennai, Vide Ita No.153/Cit(A)-3/2018-19For The Assessment Year 2005-06, Dated 13.03.2020. 2. At The Outset, We Find That There Is A Delay Of 346 Days In Appeal Filed By The Assessee, For Which Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With Reasons For Delay Has Been Filed. After Considering The Petition Filed By The Assessee, Reason For Delay In Filing The Appeal Was Due To Covid-19 Pandemic & Also Hearing Both The :-2-:

For Appellant: Mr. R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

234A, 234B and 234C are charged as per law. Demand notice u/s 156 is enclosed. 7. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) – 3, Chennai. Before the ld.CIT(A), the assessee filed a detailed written submission in respect of delay in passing the order giving effect

ARUN EXCELLO URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result appeal filed by Revenue in ITA No

ITA 537/CHNY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunatha

For Appellant: Ms. R.Anita, Addl.CITFor Respondent: 09.11.2021
Section 234ASection 234BSection 32Section 32(1)(ii)

234A of the Act in consequence to the above disallowance. 4. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s 234B of the Act in consequence to the above disallowance” 3. Brief facts of the case extracted from ITA No.537/Chny/2020 are that the assessee is engaged in the business of industrial civil and mechanical

M/S. ARUN EXCELLO URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE - 1(1),, CHENNAI

In the result appeal filed by Revenue in ITA No

ITA 731/CHNY/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunatha

For Appellant: Ms. R.Anita, Addl.CITFor Respondent: 09.11.2021
Section 234ASection 234BSection 32Section 32(1)(ii)

234A of the Act in consequence to the above disallowance. 4. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s 234B of the Act in consequence to the above disallowance” 3. Brief facts of the case extracted from ITA No.537/Chny/2020 are that the assessee is engaged in the business of industrial civil and mechanical

ESTRA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ((NOW SUCCESSOR OF M/S. ROVERCO APPAREL COMPANY PVT LTD.) ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1) , CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 2034/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri, M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan, JCIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40

234A of the Act in consequence to the above disallowances. 5. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234B of the Act in consequence to the above disallowances. 6. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234C

ROVERCO APPAREL COMPANY PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT COMPANY CIRCLE V(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 2652/CHNY/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri, M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Mr.AR.V.Sreenivasan, JCIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40

234A of the Act in consequence to the above disallowances. 5. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234B of the Act in consequence to the above disallowances. 6. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234C

J RAY MCDERMOTT ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed

ITA 2016/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

depreciation in respect of software/ license fee at the rate of 25% instead of the applicable rate of 60% per the provisions of section 32 of the Act read with Income Tax Rules 1962 ("Rules"). 9. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to the above-mentioned grounds of appeal

SHRI V. NATARAJAN (INDIVIDUAL),RASIPURAM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals of assessee in ITA No

ITA 1801/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 V. Varadappan Natarajan/ The Acit, V. Natarajan (Individual), Central Circle, No.64-C, Rotary Nagar, Salem. Rasipuram Tamil Nadu-637 408. [Pan: Acgpn1477Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, Fca (Virtual) प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2025

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. LakshmiFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 250(6)Section 37Section 68

234A, 234B and 234C. The appellant has not made ITA Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 (AYs 2016-17 & 2015-16) Varadappan Natarajan/ V. Natarajan (Individual) :: 12 :: any specific submissions. Since it is consequential in nature, it is not adjudicated separately. Consequently, Ground of appeal is Dismissed. 7.6 Vide Grounds of appeal No. 6, the appellant has challenged correctness of initiation of penalty proceedings

VARADAPPAN NATARAJAN,RASIPURAM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals of assessee in ITA No

ITA 1535/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 V. Varadappan Natarajan/ The Acit, V. Natarajan (Individual), Central Circle, No.64-C, Rotary Nagar, Salem. Rasipuram Tamil Nadu-637 408. [Pan: Acgpn1477Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, Fca (Virtual) प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2025

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. LakshmiFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 250(6)Section 37Section 68

234A, 234B and 234C. The appellant has not made ITA Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 (AYs 2016-17 & 2015-16) Varadappan Natarajan/ V. Natarajan (Individual) :: 12 :: any specific submissions. Since it is consequential in nature, it is not adjudicated separately. Consequently, Ground of appeal is Dismissed. 7.6 Vide Grounds of appeal No. 6, the appellant has challenged correctness of initiation of penalty proceedings

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 2573/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. G. Tarun, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

depreciation could not have been claimed in respect of assets acquired by DSL out of the deferred government grant in terms of Explanation 10 to Section 43 (1) of the Act. 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] by the common order dated 25th April 2014 allowed the Assessee's appeals for the AYs in question

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 2576/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. G. Tarun, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 132Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153A

depreciation could not have been claimed in respect of assets acquired by DSL out of the deferred government grant in terms of Explanation 10 to Section 43 (1) of the Act. 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] by the common order dated 25th April 2014 allowed the Assessee's appeals for the AYs in question