BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

92 results for “depreciation”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai306Delhi264Bangalore166Chennai92Kolkata68Ahmedabad37Lucknow26Pune25Jaipur24Hyderabad23Chandigarh22Cochin15Visakhapatnam13Indore7Panaji7Raipur7Rajkot5Amritsar5Jodhpur4Karnataka4Nagpur3SC3Surat3Guwahati2Cuttack2Dehradun2Himachal Pradesh1Telangana1Patna1Agra1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 14782Section 143(3)56Section 15453Disallowance45Section 1136Reopening of Assessment35Section 246A33Addition to Income33Depreciation33

GILBARCO VEEDER ROOT INDIA PVT. LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 285/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.283, 284, 285 & 286/Chny/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 32

depreciation and income accordingly. 7. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the A.Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15 are allowed. ITA Nos.285 & 286/CHNY/2025 for AY 2018-19 & 2019-20 8. The next issue raised by the assessee in the following appeals are given below: Grounds for A.Y. 2018-19 1. General 1.1 The order of the Assessing Officer

GILBARCO VEEDER ROOT INDIA PVT. LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for the A

Showing 1–20 of 92 · Page 1 of 5

Section 14828
Deduction24
Section 143(1)20
ITA 283/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.283, 284, 285 & 286/Chny/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 32

depreciation and income accordingly. 7. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the A.Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15 are allowed. ITA Nos.285 & 286/CHNY/2025 for AY 2018-19 & 2019-20 8. The next issue raised by the assessee in the following appeals are given below: Grounds for A.Y. 2018-19 1. General 1.1 The order of the Assessing Officer

GILBARCO VEEDER ROOT INDIA PVT. LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1,, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 284/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.283, 284, 285 & 286/Chny/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 32

depreciation and income accordingly. 7. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the A.Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15 are allowed. ITA Nos.285 & 286/CHNY/2025 for AY 2018-19 & 2019-20 8. The next issue raised by the assessee in the following appeals are given below: Grounds for A.Y. 2018-19 1. General 1.1 The order of the Assessing Officer

GILBARCO VEEDER ROOT INDIA PVT. LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 286/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita Nos.283, 284, 285 & 286/Chny/2025 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15, 2018-19 & 2019-20)

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 32

depreciation and income accordingly. 7. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the A.Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15 are allowed. ITA Nos.285 & 286/CHNY/2025 for AY 2018-19 & 2019-20 8. The next issue raised by the assessee in the following appeals are given below: Grounds for A.Y. 2018-19 1. General 1.1 The order of the Assessing Officer

ILJIN AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHIPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1494/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(3)

depreciation. Further, the AO has passed rectification order u/s 154 of the Act and denying MAT credit of Rs.6,64,38,277/- and stated

ILJIN AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED,,KANCHIPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1496/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(3)

depreciation. Further, the AO has passed rectification order u/s 154 of the Act and denying MAT credit of Rs.6,64,38,277/- and stated

ILJIN AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED,IRUNGATTUKOTTAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), ),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1495/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154(3)

depreciation. Further, the AO has passed rectification order u/s 154 of the Act and denying MAT credit of Rs.6,64,38,277/- and stated

DHARMA NAIDU EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT-EXEMPTIONS, CHENNAI CIRCLE, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 497/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No. 497/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S. Dharma Naidu Educational Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of & Charitable Trust, Income Tax (Exemptions), No.24, Chengalvarayan Street, Chennai Circle, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai. Chennai – 600 030. [Pan: Aaatd 2601E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri K.G. Raghunath, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Srinivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02.05.2024 : 17.05.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri K.G. Raghunath, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Srinivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

depreciation was disallowed, however, application of total income (to the extent 85% thereof) was not considered despite application of income details provided. 6. Aggrieved against the order u/s 143(1) dated 22.10.2016, assessee filed rectification application u/s 154

DCIT CIRCLE 2(1), TRICHY vs. THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD., KARUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2169/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri M. Rajan, CITFor Respondent: Shri S. Ananthan, CA &
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 36(1)(viia)

rectification by action u/s 154 of I.T. Act.” I.T.A. No.2169/Chny/2018 5 5. The ld.AR also raised the issue on merits that the issue of depreciation

THE CUDDALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD.,CUDDALORE vs. DCIT CUDDALORE CIRCLE, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 2645/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPRUAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 856/CHNY/2020[202-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 855/CHNY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-II,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 857/CHNY/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-I,, CUDDALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 858/CHNY/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

THE VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERTATIVE BANK LTD.,,VILLUPURAM vs. DCIT, VILLUPURAM CIRCLE,, VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 854/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, CUDDALLORE vs. M/S VILLUPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., VILLUPURAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 981/CHNY/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manjunatha.G

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.B. Som, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(viia)

Depreciation debited to P&L A/c” in the memo for computation of Income.” 25. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee is a co-operative bank engaged in the business of banking. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings noticed from the accounts of the assessee for the year ended 31.03.2012 that the assessee has created non-statutory reserve

M/S. DEVENTHIRA SPINNERS (P) LTD.,ERODE vs. ACIT, SALEM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 2442/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Dec 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri G. Pavan Kumarआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2442 Of 2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Supriya Pal, Jt. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 154

u/s. 154 had been upheld in the case of Velathal Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra). The only course for the assessee, if it intended to derive benefit out of the favourable decision in the case of Velathal Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. (supra), was to keep the issue alive by contesting the assessment in appeal, and which it finally did, albeit

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. ASTROTECH STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

The appeal stand dismissed in terms of our above order

ITA 1150/CHNY/2023[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Jul 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1150/Chny/2023 (िनधा)रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Dcit M/S Astrotech Steels Private Limited बनाम/ Corporate Circle-1(1) 19, Ii Floor, Right Wing, Ghatala Towers, Chennai. Avenue Road, Nungambakkam Vs. Chennai-34. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aakca-0128-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar (Jcit)- Ld. Sr. Dr " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) -Ld. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Final Hearing : 27-06-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03-07-2024 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT)- Ld. Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) -Ld. AR
Section 10ASection 143(1)Section 154

rectification order passed u/s 154 by CPC on 28-01-2021, it could be seen that the extended due date for filing of return of income for the assessee was 31-10-2018. The assessee has filed return of income on 16-10-2018 which is well within extended due date of filing of return of income. The assessee claimed

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3556/CHNY/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3556 & 3557/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Skm Egg Products Export (I) Ltd., Income Tax Circle 1, Vs. No. 185, Chennimalai Road, No. 15, Gandhiji Road, Erode 638 001. Erode 638 001. [Pan: Aaccs7160G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Sailendra Mamidi, Pcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 08.05.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 3, Coimbatore Both Dated 31.10.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2008-09 & 2009-10. In Both The Appeals, The Revenue Has Raised Following Common Grounds: “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Cit(A) Is Right In Allowing The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order U/S 154 Of A.O. Dated 13.02.2018 Directing To Allow Set Off Of Available Brought Forward Unabsorbed 'Depreciation Losses After Giving Effect To The Order Of The Cit(A) In The Assessee'S Own Case For The A.Y. 2008-09?

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri G. Baskar, Advocate
Section 10BSection 10B(6)Section 10B(6)(i)Section 10B(8)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 264

u/s 154 of A.O. dated 13.02.2018 directing to allow set off of available brought forward unabsorbed 'depreciation losses after giving effect to the order of the CIT(A) in the assessee's own case, admittedly, the assessee has not filed any rectification

ACIT, ERODE vs. SKM EGG PRODUCTS EXPORT (INDIA) LIMITED, ERODE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 3557/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 3556 & 3557/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Skm Egg Products Export (I) Ltd., Income Tax Circle 1, Vs. No. 185, Chennimalai Road, No. 15, Gandhiji Road, Erode 638 001. Erode 638 001. [Pan: Aaccs7160G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Sailendra Mamidi, Pcit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 08.05.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.07.2019 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 3, Coimbatore Both Dated 31.10.2018 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2008-09 & 2009-10. In Both The Appeals, The Revenue Has Raised Following Common Grounds: “1. Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Cit(A) Is Right In Allowing The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order U/S 154 Of A.O. Dated 13.02.2018 Directing To Allow Set Off Of Available Brought Forward Unabsorbed 'Depreciation Losses After Giving Effect To The Order Of The Cit(A) In The Assessee'S Own Case For The A.Y. 2008-09?

For Appellant: Shri Sailendra Mamidi, PCITFor Respondent: Shri G. Baskar, Advocate
Section 10BSection 10B(6)Section 10B(6)(i)Section 10B(8)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 264

u/s 154 of A.O. dated 13.02.2018 directing to allow set off of available brought forward unabsorbed 'depreciation losses after giving effect to the order of the CIT(A) in the assessee's own case, admittedly, the assessee has not filed any rectification