SHRIRAM OWNERSHIP TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for both

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 406 & 407/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. Shriram Ownership Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.4, Shriram House, I Floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aagts 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

trust created for a religious or charitable purpose. 22. What we find is that ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had confirmed the addition u/s. 2(24)(xv) of the Act r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) of the Act. Both these Sections

D.A.V. EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-2, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2017-18 is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.1667, 1668, 1669 & 1670/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 D.A.V. Educational Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 5, S V Illam, Mohanapuri Lake View Exemption Ward 4, Street, Adambakkam, Chennai. Chennai 600 088. [Pan: Aaatc5967A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Baskar, Advocate & Shri A. Satyaseelan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 28.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.01.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: These Four Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders All Dated 05.04.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19. 2. Since, The Issues Raised In These Appeals Are Similar Based On The Same Identical Facts, With The Consent Of Both The Parties, We Proceed To 2

Charitable Trust (supra), we hold the activity of sale of uniforms, textbooks, etc. and the excess of income over expenditure arising thereon which are disclosed in Form-10A are incidental to the attainment of objects of the assessee. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of section 11 of the Act for the year under consideration, accordingly, we hold

D.A.V. EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-4,, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.1667, 1668, 1669 & 1670/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2014-15, 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 D.A.V. Educational Trust, 5, S V Illam, Mohanapuri Lake View Street, Adambakkam, Chennai 600 088. [Pan: Aaatc5967A] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Appellant By Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 4, Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Shri G. Baskar, Advocate & Shri A. Satyaseelan, Advocate Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit 28.10.2025 21.01.2026 : प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent By : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : आदेश/Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: These Four Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Orders All Dated 05.04.2024 Passed By The Id. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The

Charitable Trust (supra), we hold the activity of sale of uniforms, textbooks, etc. and the excess of income over expenditure arising thereon which are disclosed in Form-10A are incidental to the attainment of objects of the assessee. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to the benefit of section 11 of the Act for the year under consideration, accordingly, we hold

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. EVERWIN EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, KOLATHUR, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

charitable trust holding registration u/s 12A/12AB of the Act. For AY 2016-17, the assessee had filed the return of income on 24.02.2017 declaring gross receipts of Rs.33,29,56,567/- and admitting NIL income after claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The case of the assessee was selected for regular scrutiny which was completed

SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATION TRUST,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2, , TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST, PERAMBALUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATION TRUST,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL COIRCLE-2, , TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SRINIVASAN CHARITABLE AND EDUCATION TRUST,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SRINIVASAN CHRITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST, ,PERAMBALUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

section 1424, who shall estimate the fair market value of the property in ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 (AYs: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18) M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust

SMT. LINGAMMAL RAMARAJU SHASTRA PRATHISHTA TRUST,RAJAPALAYAM vs. ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), COIMBATORE

charitable trusts registered u/s 12A of the Act; (d) that the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Thanthi Trust continued to hold good and was applicable to the assessee's case and that the decisions rendered in the cases of AUDA and New Noble didn't over-rule Thanthi Trust, which was rendered

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. JAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1552/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 V. The Dcit, Jaya Educational Trust, Chennai. No.8, Krishnapuram, Ii Main Road, Thiruninravur, Thiruvallur-602 024. [Pan:Aaatj 0369 D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

56,492/- 4 Srinivasa Educational Trust 9,95,81,108/- 7. From the above, it is seen that the advances made during the AY 2012-13 are still outstanding in the books of the Trust even during the AY 2015-16. Since, the assessee is not charging any Interest on the advances given to Sri Venkata Reddy and Smt. Subhasini

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

56 & 56A, Thirumalai Pillai though Shri.Sampath a trustee was not a violation falling under Section 13(1) (c) of the Act. 20 CIT(A) erroneously held that --- 7 to 7.2 5 to 5.2 10.2 Purchase of property by Preetha, daughter-in-law of Managing Trustee for 40 lakhs, though a loan application showed the value as 1.25 crore, and there

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

56 & 56A, Thirumalai Pillai though Shri.Sampath a trustee was not a violation falling under Section 13(1) (c) of the Act. 20 CIT(A) erroneously held that --- 7 to 7.2 5 to 5.2 10.2 Purchase of property by Preetha, daughter-in-law of Managing Trustee for 40 lakhs, though a loan application showed the value as 1.25 crore, and there

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI vs. VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

56 & 56A, Thirumalai Pillai though Shri.Sampath a trustee was not a violation falling under Section 13(1) (c) of the Act. 20 CIT(A) erroneously held that --- 7 to 7.2 5 to 5.2 10.2 Purchase of property by Preetha, daughter-in-law of Managing Trustee for 40 lakhs, though a loan application showed the value as 1.25 crore, and there

VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VELLORE vs. DCIT, CC IV(1), CHENNAI

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed whereas that of assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy]

56 & 56A, Thirumalai Pillai though Shri.Sampath a trustee was not a violation falling under Section 13(1) (c) of the Act. 20 CIT(A) erroneously held that --- 7 to 7.2 5 to 5.2 10.2 Purchase of property by Preetha, daughter-in-law of Managing Trustee for 40 lakhs, though a loan application showed the value as 1.25 crore, and there

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BIBIKULAM MADURAI vs. D N PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST, ARASARADI MADURAI TAMIL NADU

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1302 To 1304/Chny/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2016-17 & Cross-Objection Nos.1 To 3/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2016-17 The Ito (Exemptions Ward), Bibikulam, Madurai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. M/S.D.N. Public Charitable 13, Theni Main Road, Arasaradi, Madurai-625 016. [Pan: Aaatd 9013 C] Trust, (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent/Cross- Objector) Department By Assessee By सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : Dr. Samuel Pitta, Jcit : Mr. Arjun Raj, Advocate : 22.08.2024 : 09.10.2024 आदेश / Order Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm:

Charitable Trust and CT Scan, MRI Scan & USC fees shown by the company in its P & L account for the A.Υ. 2012-13 to AY 2017-18. The same is tabulated as below: SL No AY Total fees receipts made out of CT scan, MRI scan and Ultra sound machine by the Company (in Rs.) CT scan fees transferred