BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

29 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka550Mumbai75Bangalore68Delhi61Chennai29Chandigarh28Cuttack19Calcutta16Jaipur14Visakhapatnam12Lucknow12Kolkata11Telangana10Varanasi6Ahmedabad6Pune5Agra4Amritsar3Indore2Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan2Hyderabad2Surat2Cochin1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Patna1SC1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1135Section 270A30Section 143(3)22Section 2(15)22Section 271A20Section 12A19Exemption19Section 250(6)18Addition to Income13

NEURO UPDATE CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1480/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. G. Sitharaman, CA &For Respondent: Shri. R. Raghupathy, Addl. C.I.T
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 250

charitable trust existing from 2002 and have been claiming the exemption from its inception. The basic activity of the trust is conducting seminars in the field neuro medicine for advancement of knowledge. Similarly, during the impugned assessment year also the assessee had conducted 3 seminars for doctors in the field of neurology at Chennai by having a gross receipt

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

Disallowance12
Charitable Trust11
Section 8010

ST.JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-193), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 3293/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr. V. Balaji, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 270ASection 271A

charitable trust formed on 02.04.2012 and enjoyed section 12AA registration w.e.f. 29.05.2012 vide registration dated 26.12.2012. The assessee is noted to be running an Engineering College and has claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act since its inception. In the year under consideration, i.e. AY 2018-19, the assessee is noted to have filed return of income (RoI) u/s.139

ST. JOSEPHS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCOT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 3295/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

For Appellant: Mr. V. Balaji, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 270ASection 271A

charitable trust formed on 02.04.2012 and enjoyed section 12AA registration w.e.f. 29.05.2012 vide registration dated 26.12.2012. The assessee is noted to be running an Engineering College and has claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act since its inception. In the year under consideration, i.e. AY 2018-19, the assessee is noted to have filed return of income (RoI) u/s.139

M/S. THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SHIPBROKERS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-3,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in terms of our order as above

ITA 1928/CHNY/2025[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1927, 1928, 1929, 1930 & 1931/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act,1961. Registration under section 12AA was granted to the assessee in terms of section 2(15) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee is carrying on the activities of education in a charitable manner. The assessee, the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (ICS) having its headquarters at London, regulates

M/S. THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SHIPBROKERS,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXMEPTIONS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in terms of our order as above

ITA 1927/CHNY/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1927, 1928, 1929, 1930 & 1931/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act,1961. Registration under section 12AA was granted to the assessee in terms of section 2(15) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee is carrying on the activities of education in a charitable manner. The assessee, the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (ICS) having its headquarters at London, regulates

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SHIPBROKERS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-2, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in terms of our order as above

ITA 1930/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1927, 1928, 1929, 1930 & 1931/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act,1961. Registration under section 12AA was granted to the assessee in terms of section 2(15) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee is carrying on the activities of education in a charitable manner. The assessee, the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (ICS) having its headquarters at London, regulates

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED SHIPBROKERS,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-2, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in terms of our order as above

ITA 1931/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1927, 1928, 1929, 1930 & 1931/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act,1961. Registration under section 12AA was granted to the assessee in terms of section 2(15) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee is carrying on the activities of education in a charitable manner. The assessee, the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (ICS) having its headquarters at London, regulates

THE INSITUTE OF CHARTERED SHIPBROKERS,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-2,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed in terms of our order as above

ITA 1929/CHNY/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1927, 1928, 1929, 1930 & 1931/Chny/2025 िनधा=रण वष= /Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09, 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, FCAFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 2(15)

trust under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act,1961. Registration under section 12AA was granted to the assessee in terms of section 2(15) of the Income- tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee is carrying on the activities of education in a charitable manner. The assessee, the Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers (ICS) having its headquarters at London, regulates

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2342/CHNY/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2346/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2341/CHNY/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2344/CHNY/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2345/CHNY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GOLDEN SHELTERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result all the above mentioned appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2343/CHNY/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Apr 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Ms. S. Deepa, CAFor Respondent: 03.02.2017
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

260 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the Order of the Ld.CIY(A) the Revenue is on appeal before us. 4.2 The Ld. DR vehemently argued before us that the logic applicable for the assessment year 2006-07 cannot be adopted for the relevant assessment year 2005-06 and therefore the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and hence

ST. JOSHEPHS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-193), CHENNAI

ITA 3296/CHNY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2019-20
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 270ASection 271A

charitable trust formed\non 02.04.2012 and enjoyed section 12AA registration w.e.f. 29.05.2012\nvide registration dated 26.12.2012. The assessee is noted to be running\nan Engineering College and has claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act since\nits inception. In the year under consideration, i.e. AY 2018-19, the\nassessee is noted to have filed return of income (RoI) u/s.139

ST. JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-193), CHENNAI

ITA 3294/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 270ASection 271A

charitable trust formed\non 02.04.2012 and enjoyed section 12AA registration w.e.f. 29.05.2012\nvide registration dated 26.12.2012. The assessee is noted to be running\nan Engineering College and has claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act since\nits inception. In the year under consideration, i.e. AY 2018-19, the\nassessee is noted to have filed return of income (RoI) u/s.139

TAMILNADU SMALL AND TINY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD 4, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1415/CHNY/2024[2015-16`]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1415/Chny/2024 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2015-16 Tamilnadu Small & Tiny Industries The Income Tax Officer Association, Vs. (Exemptions), No.10, Gst Road, Guindy, Ward-4, Chennai – 600 032. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatt 2207J]

For Appellant: Shri T.Banusekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Krishna Kumar, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(8)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

trust objects to the levy of interest under sections 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.” 3. Grounds No.1 & 2 are general in nature hence, no adjudication is required. :- 3 -: 4. Grounds No.2 to 7 are relating to denial of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act invoking the provisio of section 2(15) and section

YCH LOGISTICS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Kumar Jain, CAFor Respondent: Dr. S.Palani Kumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C

charitable trust was exempt from taxation. The Tribunal permitted the assessee to raise this point and answered it in its favour. The question which was referred to the High Court was whether the Tribunal was competent in law in permitting an assessee to raise a ground at the time of the hearing of the appeal - a ground which

ST. JOSEPHS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

ITA 3297/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 270ASection 271A

charitable trust formed\non 02.04.2012 and enjoyed section 12AA registration w.e.f. 29.05.2012\nvide registration dated 26.12.2012. The assessee is noted to be running\nan Engineering College and has claimed exemption u/s.11 of the Act since\nits inception. In the year under consideration, i.e. AY 2018-19, the\nassessee is noted to have filed return of income (RoI) u/s.139

THE HANDLOOM EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI

In the results, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 2131/CHNY/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Chandra Poojari] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos. 2130 & 2131/Mds/2013 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-2011

For Appellant: Shri. K. Balasubramanian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. A.V. Sreekanth, IRS, JCIT
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 143(1)

trust with advancement of any other object of ITA Nos.2130 & 2131/Mds/2013 :- 11 -: general public utility. The assessee’s letter dated 21.10.2013 in response to this office letter dated 17.10.2013 was vague and tangential to the issues raised. Sec.37(1) details with deductions permissible under the head "profits and gains of business or profession" and not related to the issues