BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “TDS”+ Section 272Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune354Delhi222Mumbai124Chennai88Bangalore71Visakhapatnam58Ahmedabad28Karnataka26Nagpur24Kolkata23Allahabad23Cochin19Lucknow17Panaji15Jaipur14Indore13Chandigarh12Cuttack12Hyderabad11Surat11Raipur10Agra8Varanasi6Rajkot4Patna3Jodhpur2Kerala1Amritsar1Jabalpur1SC1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 234E35Section 200A27Section 25010Section 272A(2)(k)9TDS7Section 1486Section 143(2)5Section 142(1)5Section 200(3)4Penalty

SH. JASBIR SINGH ANAND,JADADHRI vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result all the above appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 184/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Garg

For Appellant: Shri. Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statements / returns in the present set of appeals for the period prior to 01.06.2015, was not empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer under section 200A of the Act in all these appeals does not stand and the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section

4
Addition to Income3
Business Income2

SH. JASBIR SINGH ANAND,JADADHRI vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result all the above appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 185/CHANDI/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Garg

For Appellant: Shri. Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statements / returns in the present set of appeals for the period prior to 01.06.2015, was not empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer under section 200A of the Act in all these appeals does not stand and the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section

SH. JASBIR SINGH ANAND,JADADHRI vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result all the above appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 183/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Garg

For Appellant: Shri. Tejmohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

TDS statements / returns in the present set of appeals for the period prior to 01.06.2015, was not empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act. Hence, the intimation issued by the Assessing Officer under section 200A of the Act in all these appeals does not stand and the demand raised by way of charging the fees under section

RAJESH BANSAL,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1447/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Gargआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1447/Chd/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Pritish Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 200(3)Section 250Section 272A(2)(k)

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The A.O., therefore, levied the penalty for late filing of the TDS returns u/s 272A

M/S BNK INVESTMENTS,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/CHANDI/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Apr 2019AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan SinghFor Respondent: Shri Yogender Mittal,Sr.DR
Section 206ASection 272A(2)(k)

272A(2)(k) had been levied, to the non- availability of correct PAN numbers of the deductees which was compulsorily required for filing/uploading the TDS returns in the impugned year. The Revenue has controverted the above facts stating that in earlier years also, the assessee was filing TDS returns indicating PAN of the deductee and that as per Section

HP AGRO INDUSTRIES CORP. LTD.,PARWANOO vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS), VAISHALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1072/CHANDI/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Jul 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri R.L Negiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 1072/Chd/2018 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/S H.P. Agro Industries The Asstt. Cit, बनाम Corporation Ltd., Centralized Processing Cell-Tds, Plot No. 8, Bangluru Pesticide Unit, Parwanoo (H.P) "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Ptlh11428E अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing Through Video Conferencing "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee By : Shri Manoj Kumar, Advocate राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. Cit(Dr)

For Appellant: Shri Manoj Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 200(1)(c)Section 200A(1)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

THE COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEERS,PATIALA vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1573/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptathe Commander Works Engineers, Vs. The Jcit (Tds), Headquarter Bldg No.26, Chandigarh. New Lal Bagh, Patiala. Pan: Ptlh12424G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vibhor Garg, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Meena, JCIT
Section 200Section 272A(2)(k)Section 274

272A(2)(k) read with section 274 of the Act not to be levied for late filing of the quarterly statements. In response, it was submitted that TDS

BANUR BROTHER ,PATIALA vs. ITO-WARD-1, AMBALA

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as and by way of remand to Ld

ITA 772/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Goyal, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 253Section 270ASection 69A

272A(1)(d) of the IT. Act for non compliance of notice sent to the assessee online electronically in E-proceedings facility through assessee's account in e- filing website of Income Tax Department.” 6. A bare and simple perusal of Ld. AO order clearly shows that assessee was totally non responsive to any notices issued

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. WARYAM STEEL CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED, KANGANWAL ROAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the Cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 757/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Muskan Garg, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 148Section 250

272A(1)(d) were initiated for under-reporting income, failure to file an audit report, and non-compliance with statutory notices, respectively. Interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was also charged. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order held

WARYAM STEEL CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the Cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 715/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Muskan Garg, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 148Section 250

272A(1)(d) were initiated for under-reporting income, failure to file an audit report, and non-compliance with statutory notices, respectively. Interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was also charged. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order held

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH vs. ESSIX BIOSCIENCES LIMITED, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Department is

ITA 534/CHANDI/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 14ASection 201Section 40

TDS was not deducted on the interest paid to M/s Conquer Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd., M/s Ind Swift Laboratories Ltd. and M/s Fortune India Constructions Ltd. 6.1 The assessee, in reply, submitted copy of Form 26A relating to M/s Conquer Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd., M/s Conquer Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd., M/s Ind Swift Laboratories Ltd. and M/s Fortune India Constructions

GEETA SHARMA,SUNAM vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , PATIALA

ITA 476/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Saldi, CAFor Respondent: ShriRohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 10(37)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 253Section 263Section 44ASection 80T

Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued which was dated 31.03.2021 requiring the assessee to submit or cause to submit - (i) Any evidence on which he may rely in support of his return of income; (ii) Reply to the above-mentioned issues Electronically in 'e- Proceedings' facility through your account in e-Filing web site (www.Incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in