BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

116 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai387Ahmedabad325Pune295Delhi223Chennai208Jaipur199Kolkata142Surat126Bangalore116Hyderabad69Chandigarh46Rajkot44Indore43Amritsar41Nagpur37Visakhapatnam34Lucknow34Cochin21Cuttack21Jodhpur14Agra14Raipur11Jabalpur10Ranchi10Panaji9Allahabad6Patna6Dehradun2Guwahati1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 12A315Section 80G184Exemption86Section 80G(5)63Charitable Trust52Section 1145Addition to Income24Natural Justice18Section 2(15)17

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

ITA 1082/BANG/2022[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri. Sudheendra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sreenivas T Bidari, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

Charitable Institution or Religious Institution. 7. We have heard the rival submissions. The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the approval by the PCIT under section 80G requires fulfilment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5). These conditions are as under: (i) The income of the Trust

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

Showing 1–20 of 116 · Page 1 of 6

Section 1217
Section 11(1)(a)14
Section 8013

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

ITA 1083/BANG/2022[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri. Sudheendra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sreenivas T Bidari, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

Charitable Institution or Religious Institution. 7. We have heard the rival submissions. The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the approval by the PCIT under section 80G requires fulfilment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5). These conditions are as under: (i) The income of the Trust

SHROUTA VIJNAM GURUKULAM,MANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTIONS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

ITA 694/BANG/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 May 2024

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : Na M/S. Shrouta Vijnan Gurukulam, Vs. Ito (Exemptions), 1 Nidagod, Targod B. O. Ward – 1, Arasapur, Mangaluru. Uttara Kannada – 561 402. Pan : Aants 0655 A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Prakash S Hegde, Ca Revenue By : Shri. D. K. Mishra, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 20.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.05.2024 O R D E R Per George George K: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Cit(E)’S Order Dated 22.02.2024 Rejecting The Assessee’S Application Seeking Approval Under Section 80G Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Prakash S Hegde, CAFor Respondent: Shri. D. K. Mishra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable objects of the Trust. 9. The approval by the PCIT under section 80G requires fulfilment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5

SRI ASHVALAYANA VRUNDA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

ITA 1085/BANG/2022[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.B.R.Sudheendra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.K.Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable objects of the Trust. 9. The approval by the PCIT under section 80G requires fulfilment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5

SRI ASHVALAYANA VRUNDA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

ITA 1084/BANG/2022[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.B.R.Sudheendra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.K.Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable objects of the Trust. 9. The approval by the PCIT under section 80G requires fulfilment of all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5

ANUGRAHA EDUCATION TRUST,SULLIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 23/BANG/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Apr 2025AY 2024-25
For Appellant: Ms. Sunaiana Bhatia, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Srinandini Das, D.R
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(2)

charitable\ninstitutions, or other approved entities. To qualify for deduction under this section, the\ncontribution must be a voluntary donation to an institution registered under Section 80G.\nHowever, school fees paid to educational institutions-even if the institution is registered\nunder Section 80G-are treated as payment for services (i.e., for education provided) and\nnot as a voluntary donation. Therefore

ACHARYA SRI TULSI MAHAPRAGYA SEVA KENDRA CHARITABLE TRUST ,BANGALORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 951/BANG/2025[NA]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore03 Sept 2025
Section 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

sections": [ "80G", "80G(5)", "12A", "12AB", "2(15)" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the 80G approval without providing sufficient opportunity and considering all evidence, and if the trust's activities are indeed charitable

SHRI PURUSHOTTAMA NARASIMHA BHARATI SANATANA SABHA,UTTARA KANNADA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS, WARD-1, HUBLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust is allowed

ITA 661/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jun 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2024-25

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Hedge, CAFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, JCIT-DR
Section 12A

section 80G. S. 80G (5) provides that the trust should be established for a “charitable purpose”. Explanation 3 to s. 80G

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1319/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jan 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri V Chandrasekhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)

charitable institutions vide various CBDT circulars and finally, vide Circular - 29 - ITANos.827, 875 & 1136/Chny/2023 No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023. Similarly, the timeline prescribed forfiling Form No.10A for recognition u/s.80G of the Act was also extended up-to 30.09.2023 by the samecircular for trusts filing registration under clause (i) to first proviso to section 80G(5

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BENGALAURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1320/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jan 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri V Chandrasekhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)

charitable institutions vide various CBDT circulars and finally, vide Circular - 29 - ITANos.827, 875 & 1136/Chny/2023 No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023. Similarly, the timeline prescribed forfiling Form No.10A for recognition u/s.80G of the Act was also extended up-to 30.09.2023 by the samecircular for trusts filing registration under clause (i) to first proviso to section 80G(5

CITY HOSPITAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,MANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 713/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jun 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: Na

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Shivanand Kalakeri, D.R
Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Trust, Mangalore Page 4 of 10 proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G from 07.04.2022 to assessment year

SRI SRINIVASA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1075/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Siva Prasad Reddy & Shri BalachandranFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(45)Section 80G

80G of the Act. The assessee trust is engaged in charitable activities, including education and healthcare. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the donation made by the assessee to another trust on the ground that the recipient trust was not registered under section 12A of the Act. As per the provisions of section 11 of the Act, a charitable trust

SRI SRINIVASA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1076/BANG/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Feb 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Siva Prasad Reddy & Shri BalachandranFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(45)Section 80G

80G of the Act. The assessee trust is engaged in charitable activities, including education and healthcare. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the donation made by the assessee to another trust on the ground that the recipient trust was not registered under section 12A of the Act. As per the provisions of section 11 of the Act, a charitable trust

DHWANI SHRISTI FOUNDATION ,BAGANALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2464/BANG/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Srinandini Das, D.R
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Act. The ld. Commissioner(Exemptions) after receiving the application for granting approval u/s 80G of the Act, ITA Nos.2463 & 2464/Bang/2024 Dhwani Shristi Foundation Designation: Charitable Trust

DHWANI SHRISTI FOUNDATION,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2463/BANG/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Srinandini Das, D.R
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Act. The ld. Commissioner(Exemptions) after receiving the application for granting approval u/s 80G of the Act, ITA Nos.2463 & 2464/Bang/2024 Dhwani Shristi Foundation Designation: Charitable Trust

SOCIETY OF PERPETUAL HELP HOME FOR THE AGED,SASTHAN POST UDUPI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 515/BANG/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2025-26 Society Of Perpetual Help Home For The Aged, Vs. Cit(E), Pandeshwara Village, Bangalore. Sasthan Post, Udupi, Udupi – 576 226. Pan : Aabap 6Lo5 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Kashyap S. Vepari, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Murali Mohan, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bangalore. Date Of Hearing : 15.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.07.2025

For Appellant: Shri. Kashyap S. Vepari, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Murali Mohan, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 12Section 124Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

Charitable Trust Vs CIT, ITA No. 5111/MUM/2024, wherein it was held as under: 5. We heard the parties and perused the material on record. Before we proceed to examine the facts in assessee's case, it is important to first look at the relevant provisions of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G

SHRI SIWANCHI OSWAL JAIN BHAVAN TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2173/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Aseem Sharma, CIT (DR)
Section 12A

5 of 10 activities. Section 12AB(1)(a) mandates that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall satisfy himself about (i) the genuineness of the activities, and (ii) the compliance with applicable laws which are material for achieving the trust's objectives. 10.1 Upon such satisfaction, registration is to be granted; failing which, an opportunity of being heard must be provided

SHRI SIWANCHI OSWAL JAIN BHAVAN TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2172/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Aseem Sharma, CIT (DR)
Section 12A

5 of 10 activities. Section 12AB(1)(a) mandates that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall satisfy himself about (i) the genuineness of the activities, and (ii) the compliance with applicable laws which are material for achieving the trust's objectives. 10.1 Upon such satisfaction, registration is to be granted; failing which, an opportunity of being heard must be provided

WELLNESS CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 365/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Sept 2025AY 2025-26
Section 12A

trust had charitable objects, some genuine activities, and compliant investments, and set aside the CIT(E)'s order.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "12AB", "80G", "2(15)", "11(2)", "11(5

ACADEMY OF GENERAL EDUCATION,UDUPI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 716/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jun 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: Na

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Shivanand Kalakeri, D.R
Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

5) of section 80G of the Act in Form No.10AB on 10.08.2024. 3.1 The ld. CIT(Exemptions), Bangalore after granting opportunity of being heard rejected the approval u/s 80G of the Act on the following grounds: (i) The assessee trust reported surplus every year which is not utilized towards charitable