BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

84 results for “depreciation”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai515Delhi391Bangalore194Chennai155Kolkata84Ahmedabad84Hyderabad55Jaipur50Pune45Raipur42Chandigarh31Lucknow29Indore28Visakhapatnam26Rajkot25Cochin22Jodhpur21Cuttack21Surat21SC7Nagpur6Amritsar5Patna5Panaji3Agra3Jabalpur2Ranchi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 263223Section 143(3)124Section 14A57Addition to Income52Depreciation51Disallowance50Revision u/s 26335Section 80I30Deduction30Section 80G

OLYMPIC DECOR LLP,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 423/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2018-19 Olympic Décor Llp Pr.Commissioner Of 6, Patel Avenue, Nr.Gurudwara Vs Income Tax-3 Sg Highway, Bodakdev Ambawadi Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad. Pan : Adafs 2113 H (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr.Advocate & Parimalsinh B. Parmar, Ars : Shri Rignesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28/04/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 23/05/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 28Section 32(1)(ii)Section 32(2)Section 68Section 80I

depreciation on goodwill. iii. Deduction under section 80IA; and iv. Non-application of section 68 on the transaction with Crown Laminates Pvt. Ltd. 9 15. Before we proceed to address the specific issues raised in the impugned order under section 263

Showing 1–20 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

21
Section 115J19
Survey u/s 133A16

BAKERI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 954/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: S/Shri Sanjay Garg & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21 Bakeri Projects Pvt. Lt. The Dcit, Cir.(1)(1) 1St Floor, Sanskrut Vs. Ahmedabad. Old High Court Road Off: Ashram Road Ahmedabad. Pan : Aagcb 1864 L (Applicant) (Responent)

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Shah, AR, and Shri Bharat Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri R.P. Rastogi, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80I

depreciation, and allows set-off strictly limited to the eligible amount for A.Y. 2018–19. The fact that the AO issued a section 154 notice on the same issue further underscores that the AO had applied his mind, and the matter was not overlooked. 18. Accordingly, we hold that the order passed under section 263

M/S. GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result the order of the Ld

ITA 194/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 263Section 32ASection 35ASection 40A(3)

depreciation under Section 35AC of the Act. Even otherwise, the Ld. PCIT erred in not pointing out any error and the amount prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Hence, the Ld. PCIT erred in invoking the powers u/s. 263

GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 572/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.572/Ahd/2020 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2015-16 Gujarat State Electricity The Pr.Cit-1 Corporation Ltd. बनाम/ Vadodara – 390 015 Sardar Patel Vidhyut Bhavan V/S. Race Course Circle Vadodara – 390 007 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aaacg 6864 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Manish J. Shah & Shri Jimi Patel, Ars Revenue By : Shri A.P. Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 08/04/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah &For Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

section 263 of the Act founded upon such assessment is equally liable to be quashed. 4.1. The undisputed facts are that the assessee filed its original return of income on 30.09.2015 declaring NIL income after setting off brought forward depreciation

GMM PFAULDER LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 839/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.839/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2020-21 Gmm Pfaulder Ltd. The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 3Rd Floor, B-Jadav Chambers Ahmedabad-1 V/S. Navrangpura H.O. Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ashram Road Ahmedabad – 380 009 "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aabcg 0563 A (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate Revenue By : Shri Sher Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /10/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Siddhartha Nautiyal, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad-1 [Hereinafter Referred To As “Ld. Pr. Cit” For Short] Dated 07/03/2025 Passed In Exercise Of His Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act" For Short] For Assessment Year (Ay) 2020- 21. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: Gmm Pfaulder Ltd. Vs. Pcit Asst. Year : 2020-21 2

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sher Singh, CIT-DR
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 32Section 80G

depreciation amounting to Rs.1,48,30,256 on Goodwill acquired in Industrial Mixing Solution Division from Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd on slum sale basis, is not allowable under section 32 of the Act thereby upholding the revision proceeding under section 263

AARVEE DENIMS & EXPORTS LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 396/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.396/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2018-19 Aarvee Denims & Exports Ltd. The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 191, Shahwadi Ahmedabad-1 V/S. Narol–Sarkhej Highway Ahmedabad – 382 405 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aabca 6019 P (अपीलाथ&/ Appellant) ('( यथ&/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Divyakant Parikh, Ar Revenue By : Shri Prithviraj Meena, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 27/09/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Divyakant Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prithviraj Meena, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 43BSection 80I

263, holding that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue due to two specific issues:- i. That, the alleged failure of the AO to disallow unpaid leave salary under section 43B of the Act, and ii. That, the AO's failure to verify the claim of depreciation

GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE DCIT, , VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1765/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms.Madhumita Roy"नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Gujarat Energy Transmission The Pcit-I Corporation Ltd. Vadodra Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan V. Race Course Circle, Baroda. Pan : Aabcg 4029 R "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Gujarat Energy Transmission The Deputy Corporation Ltd. Commissioner Of Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan V. Income Tax, Circle Race Course Circle, Baroda. 1(1)(1), Vadodra Pan : Aabcg 4029 R Baroda.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 263Section 40

section 263 of the Act. 10. Moreover, it is important to note that there is no revenue implication, and no prejudice has been inflicted upon the Revenue, as the applicable tax rate for the invoice payment in the subsequent year, during which the invoice payment was properly accounted for, included the appropriate TDS deduction. Considering the above, we find support

GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPN.LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE CIT-1, BARODA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1119/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms.Madhumita Roy"नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Gujarat Energy Transmission The Pcit-I Corporation Ltd. Vadodra Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan V. Race Course Circle, Baroda. Pan : Aabcg 4029 R "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Gujarat Energy Transmission The Deputy Corporation Ltd. Commissioner Of Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan V. Income Tax, Circle Race Course Circle, Baroda. 1(1)(1), Vadodra Pan : Aabcg 4029 R Baroda.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 263Section 40

section 263 of the Act. 10. Moreover, it is important to note that there is no revenue implication, and no prejudice has been inflicted upon the Revenue, as the applicable tax rate for the invoice payment in the subsequent year, during which the invoice payment was properly accounted for, included the appropriate TDS deduction. Considering the above, we find support

TTEC INDIA CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1026/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21 Ttec India Customer Solutions Pr.Commissioner Of Private Limited, Ttec Ahmedabad Vs. Income Tax-3 Opp: L.J.College Vejalpur Off: Sg Road, Makarba Ahmedabad. Fatewadi Bo, Fatewadi Ahmedabad. Pan : Aaccm 1005A (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Vishal Kabra, Ar Assessee By : Shri Rignesh Das, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 03/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 04/07/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

For Appellant: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)Section 80G

263, alleged that the Assessing Officer failed to verify whether the foreign tax credit (FTC) of Rs.8,02,50,535/- claimed by the assessee was allowable under section 90 read with Article 24 of the India–Philippines DTAA. It was further alleged that the AO did not ascertain whether the Philippine taxes were actually paid and whether the corresponding income

CPL HOLDINGS LLP (SUCCESSOR TO CPL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1022/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32

depreciation of goodwill of Rs.10,89,82,058/- only in the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act. The Ld. PCIT, therefore, held that the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s 143(3) of the Act was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, the impugned order under Section 263

GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD.,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 3124/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 28Section 37Section 43(1)

depreciation required to be calculated under Schedule XIV of the Companies Act. The Commissioner, acting under section 263, held that

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), NOW CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA vs. GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD.,, BARODA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 3164/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 28Section 37Section 43(1)

depreciation required to be calculated under Schedule XIV of the Companies Act. The Commissioner, acting under section 263, held that

DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1) AHMEDABAD, AHMEBABAD vs. RAYON REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 410/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 143(3)Section 263

depreciation on Wind Mill by stating that order of PCIT u/s 263 was quashed by Hon’ble ITAT and therefore consequential order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 do not survive, without deciding the appeal on merits and not appreciating that the revenue had already filed an appeal before the Hon’ble high Court against order of Hon’ble ITAT quashing

AMNS PORTS VIZAG LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ESSAR VIZAG TERMINALS LIMITED),SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 902/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT-D.R
Section 263Section 32

section 263 of the Act cannot be invoked and accordingly, the impugned order be quashed as bad in law. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO GROUND NO. I GROUND NO. II: DISALLOWANCE OF DEPRECIATION

MADHYA GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD.,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 191/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.191/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Pr.Commissioner बनाम/ Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan Of Income V/S. Race Course Tax-1 Vadodaa – 390 007 Vadodara – 390 007 "ायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aadcm 7439 H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.K. Patel, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43B

263 of the I.T. Act are clearly attracted in this case. 13. As per the Ld.PCIT, the assessment order was held to be erroneous for the reason that the assessee has furnished certain details with respect to the issue of bonus before him which were not there before the AO and the AO , Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. vs. Pr.CIT

SHREE ALEKH,BHAVNAGAR vs. PCIT AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 91/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad06 Mar 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2017-18

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

depreciation was justly claimed. 4. The Id. PCIT has further erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that the view taken by the AO is a possible view and hence the proceedings are illegal and bad in law. 5. The Id. PCIT has further erred in law in not coming to any concrete conclusion and without conducting

TOURISM CORPORATION OF GUJARAT LIMITED,GANDHINAGAR vs. PCIT AHMEDABAD - 3, AHMEDABAD

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1275/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 43(1)

depreciation differ and tax adjustments are required where grants affect WDV or income. The Principal Commissioner examined judicial precedents cited and relied upon relevant case law to clarify when revisional jurisdiction under section 263

M/S. SABARMATI GAS LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 368/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2018-19 Sabarmati Gas Ltd. The Ld.Pr.Cit Plot No.907, Sector 21 Vs Ahmedabad-3. Gandhinagar 382 021 Pan : Aakcs 0110 N

For Respondent: Shri H. Phani Raju, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32Section 37(1)Section 40

263 of the Act be considered as null & void and deserves to be quashed. 2 (II) Disallowance of depreciation of Rs.1,68,21,472/- due to reclassification of assets of as calculated by the learned Pr. CIT being contrary to law may kindly be deleted. Alternatively: If the Disallowance of Depreciation of Rs.1,68,21,472/- due to rectification

SHREEJI COLD STORAGE,ARAVALI vs. THE PR. CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 151/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri D. K. Parikh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35ASection 80I

depreciation allowable as per Act It be so held now and order passed under Section 263 setting aside the Order

JAYBHOLE COLD STORAGE,ARAVALI vs. THE PR. CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 152/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri D. K. Parikh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kamlesh Makwana, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35ASection 80I

depreciation allowable as per Act It be so held now and order passed under Section 263 setting aside the Order