HARDAYAL MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,SHIKOHABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), FIROZABAD, FIROZABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee are allowed

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh

reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 of the Act were initiated by issuing notice under section 148 on 13.09.2018 after seeking prior approval of the competent authority, i.e., PCIT-2, Agra under section 151

VIKAS CHANDRA HUF,ALIGARH vs. ITO WARD-4(1)(1), ALIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshvikas Chandra Huf, Vs. Cit(Appeals), D-117, Ramesh Vihar, Nfac, Delhi Ramghar Road, Aligarh Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aakjv9476N Assessee By : Shri Pankaj Garg, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026

147 of the Act vide issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act on 28.3.2024. The reasons recorded for reopening the assessment together with the approval granted by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -1 , Agra (hereinafter referred to ld PCIT) in terms of section 151 of the Act are enclosed in pages 2 to 5 of the Paper

HARICHARAN RATHORE,ASHOK NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,ASHOK NAGAR, ASHOK NAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshharicharan Rathore, Vs. Ito, 125, Path Kheda, Ashok Ashok Nagar, Nagar, Mp Mp (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Csqpr0999M Assessee By : Shri Rajendra Sharma, Adv Shri Manuj Sharma, Adv Revenue By: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026

151; So as to impart greater efficiency, transparency and accountability by inter alia eliminating the interface between the Income Tax Authorities and assessee. Sub-section 3 of Section 151A of the Act also provides that every notification issued under sub- Haricharan Rathore section (1) and (2) of Section 151A of the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament

BADARIPRASAD,GUNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER GUNA, GUNA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshbadriprasad, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Heerabagh Colony, Guna, Guna, Gwalior Gwalior (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Arapr6314B

151; So as to impart greater efficiency, transparency and accountability by inter alia eliminating the interface between the Income Tax Authorities and assessee. Sub-section 3 of Section 151A of the Act also provides that every notification issued under sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 151A of the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament. Badriprasad

NARAYANI RATHORE,SHIVPURI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshnarayani Rathore, Vs. Assessment Unit, Peeroth Shivpuri, Income Tax Shivpuri, Mp Department, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Dhgpr1886H

151; So as to impart greater efficiency, transparency and accountability by inter alia eliminating the interface between the Income Tax Authorities and assessee. Sub-section 3 of Section 151A of the Act also provides that every notification issued under sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 151A of the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament. In exercise

SUNITA,SAHU vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshashok Sahu, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Purana Bazar, Chirgaon, Ward-2(3)(1), Jhansi Jhansi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Jgsps3446H Sunita, Vs. Assessment Unit, Ward No. 2, Chobyana Income Tax Talrehat Lake View Department, Camp, Lalitpur, Lalitpur, National Faceless Up Appeal Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Jgps3438H

151; So as to impart greater efficiency, transparency and accountability by inter alia eliminating the interface between the Income Tax Authorities and assessee. Sub-section 3 of Section 151A of the Act also provides that every notification issued under sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 151A of the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament. In exercise

ASHOK SAHU,JHANSI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(1), JHANSI, JHANSI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganeshashok Sahu, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Purana Bazar, Chirgaon, Ward-2(3)(1), Jhansi Jhansi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Jgsps3446H Sunita, Vs. Assessment Unit, Ward No. 2, Chobyana Income Tax Talrehat Lake View Department, Camp, Lalitpur, Lalitpur, National Faceless Up Appeal Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Jgps3438H

151; So as to impart greater efficiency, transparency and accountability by inter alia eliminating the interface between the Income Tax Authorities and assessee. Sub-section 3 of Section 151A of the Act also provides that every notification issued under sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 151A of the Act shall be laid before each House of Parliament. In exercise

MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL,FARRUKHABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE-4(2)(1) FARRUKHABAD, FARRUKHABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for AY 2017-18 and appeal of the assessee for AY 2015-16 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh(Through Virtual Hearing)

151 of the Act in the prescribed proforma which is reproduced herein:- ITA Nos. 54 & 76/AGR/2025 Manoj Kumar Agarwal 11. The reassessment was completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30.03.2022 wherein an addition of Rs. 1,23,46,358/- being the amount of unsecured loan added u/s 68 of the Act. 12. At the outset

MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL,FARUKHABAD vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, FARRUKHABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for AY 2017-18 and appeal of the assessee for AY 2015-16 is partly allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh(Through Virtual Hearing)

151 of the Act in the prescribed proforma which is reproduced herein:- ITA Nos. 54 & 76/AGR/2025 Manoj Kumar Agarwal 11. The reassessment was completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30.03.2022 wherein an addition of Rs. 1,23,46,358/- being the amount of unsecured loan added u/s 68 of the Act. 12. At the outset

SAGAR DWELLINGS P LTD,NEAR SUN TEMPLE GWALIOR vs. ACIT, FACELESS

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH (Judicial Member)

reassessment order dated 21.03.2022 passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act. 3. Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before the Ld. CIT(Appeals), who dismissed assessee’s appeal and confirmed the impugned addition. 4 | P a g e 4. Present second appeal has been filed on the following grounds : “1. BECAUSE, upon due consideration of facts and in the overall

TEJ SINGH,MATHURA vs. ITO 1(3)(4), MATHURA

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

151 of the Act, a notice u/s 148 was issued by the A.O. The reasons for issuing notice dated 30/03/2016 u/s 148 of the Act reads as under:- Page 6 of 23 Tej Singh vs. ITO “The undersigned is in possession that the assessee has sold immovable property of Rs. 5040273/- during the year under consideration

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

151 of the Act. The assessee filed his\nreturn on 20.04.2021 declaring the same income as was originally declared, in\nresponse to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The reassessment was completed u/s 147\nread with Section

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

151 of the Act. The assessee filed his\nreturn on 20.04.2021 declaring the same income as was originally declared, in\nresponse to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The reassessment was completed u/s 147\nread with Section

ANIL KUMAR YADAV LEGAL HEIR SMT. LONG SHREE ,MAINPURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(2)(4), MAINPURI

147 of the Act on 26-12-2018. The sole grievance\nof the assessee is computation of capital gains. The registry has noted\ndelay of 297 days in the appeal which stand condoned.\n2. The Ld. AR, at the outset, assailed validity of reassessment\njurisdiction by placing on record the approval granted by Ld. Pr. CIT to\ncontend that

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

151 of the Act. The assessee filed his\nreturn on 20.04.2021 declaring the same income as was originally declared, in\nresponse to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The reassessment was completed u/s 147\nread with Section

PRAMOD KUMAR GARG,AGRA vs. DCIT,CIRCLE 2(1)(1), AGRA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2015-16

sections 147 to 151 of the old law ceased to operate from 01.04.2021. The Apex Court in Rajeev Bansal (supra) specifically observed that after 01.04.2021, any reference to the Income Tax Act means the Income Tax Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021 and held that the time limit prescribed for issuing reassessment notice u/s

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JHANSI vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(1), JHANSI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

151 of the Act. The assessee filed his\nreturn on 20.04.2021 declaring the same income as was originally declared, in\nresponse to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The reassessment was completed u/s 147\nread with Section

SUDHINDRA PAL SINGH,ETAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), ETAH, ETAH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Virtual Hearing) Sudhindra Pal Singh, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Bara Bhondela, At Bara Ward-3(2), Bhondela, Awagarh, Etah Etah- 207 301, Etah (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Ekyps0396P

147 of the Act. I find that the assessee has also raised additional ground of appeal stating that Sudhindra Pal, Singh the approval granted under section 151 of the Act by the learned PCIT for reopening the assessment is mechanical which vitiates the entire reassessment proceedings. 3. Since this additional ground, being a purely legal issue and facts relevant