PRAMOD KUMAR GARG,AGRA vs. DCIT,CIRCLE 2(1)(1), AGRA
Facts
The assessee, engaged in share trading, filed a return for AY 2015-16. Information from DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai, indicated the assessee's involvement in manipulative reversal trades in illiquid stock options, leading to non-genuine business losses/gains. The AO added speculative income, which the CIT(A) partly confirmed.
Held
The tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 on July 30, 2022, for AY 2015-16 was beyond the period of limitation as per the Supreme Court's decision in Rajeev Bansal. Consequently, the notice and all subsequent assessment proceedings were quashed.
Key Issues
The primary legal issue was the validity and limitation period of the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2015-16, in light of the Finance Act, 2021, and Supreme Court pronouncements.
Sections Cited
Section 148, Section 149, Section 147, Section 151, Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, AGRA
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE : SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 427/Agr/2025 Assessment Year: 2015-16
Pramod Kumar Garg, C-8, Vs. DCIT, Circle 2(1)(1), Kamla Nagar, Agra-282005. Agra. PAN : ACHPG7825N (Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by Sh. Shashi Kumar Agarwal, CA Department by Sh. Shailendra Srivastava, Sr. DR
Date of hearing 16.12.2025 Date of pronouncement 15.01.2026
ORDER PER : SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been preferred by assessee against the impugned order dated 20.08.2025 passed in Appeal No. NFAC/2014-15/10225440 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi u/s. 250
of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2015-16, wherein learned CIT(A) has partly allowed assessee’s appeal.
Brief facts state that the assessee was engaged in the business of trading in shares and securities. The assessee filed original return of income for A.Y. 2015-16 on 11.09.2015, declaring total income of
ITA No.427/Agr/2025
Rs.24,78,460/-. An information was received from DGIT (Inv.), Mumbai
through the Income-tax Business Application regarding coordinated and
premeditated trading on the Mumbai Stock Exchange by engaging in
reversal trades in illiquid stock options resulting in non-genuine business
loss/gains to the beneficiary assessees, to which the present assessee
was a party to such manipulation. It was noticed from the data available
under Project Falcon on the ITBA that the assessee has purchased stock
options for an aggregate premium value amounting to Rs. 25,59,000/-
and sold the same for an aggregate premium value of Rs.90,21,000/-,
resulting in profit of Rs. 64,62,000/-. After considering assessee’s
submissions, learned Assessing Officer found that the assessee earned
speculative income of Rs.85,67,234/- from M/s. A.G. Shares and
Securities Ltd. and M/s. Multi Gaining Securities Services Pvt. Ltd. and
added the same in the declared income of the assessee, vide order
dated 09.03.2023.
Aggrieved, assessee preferred first appeal before Learned CIT(A),
who concluded that the notice u/s. 148 of the Act was valid notice and
partly allowed assessee’s appeal by reducing the addition to
Rs.64,62,000/- as against addition of Rs.85,67,234/- made by the
Assessing Officer.
2 | P a g e
ITA No.427/Agr/2025
Assessee has preferred this second appeal mainly on the ground
that learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the substantial amount of
addition made by the Assessing Officer, ignoring the invalid notice dated
30.07.2022 issued u/s. 148 of the Act, which is contrary to the order
dated 03.10.2024 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in Union of India &Ors.
vs. Rejeev Bansal, 2024 (10) TMI 264(SC)(LB).
Perused the records and heard learned representative for
assessee and learned DR for revenue.
The sum and substance of assessee’s grievance is that the notice
dated 30.07.2022 issued u/s. 148 relevant to the assessment year 2015-
16 is invalid and contrary to the referred decision dated 03.10.2024
passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajeev
Bansal [2024] 167 taxmann.com 70 (SC).
The instant case relates to A.Y. 2015-16. Assessing Officer initially
issued notice dated 28.06.2021 u/s. 148 of the Act. The Finance Act,
2021 substituted section 147 to 151 of the Act w.e.f. 01.04.2021 and
sections 147 to 151 of the old law ceased to operate from 01.04.2021.
The Apex Court in Rajeev Bansal (supra) specifically observed that after
01.04.2021, any reference to the Income Tax Act means the Income Tax
Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021 and held that the time limit
prescribed for issuing reassessment notice u/s. 149 operate 3 | P a g e
ITA No.427/Agr/2025
retrospectively for three years for all situation and six years in case the
escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to more than
Rs.50 lacs. In the instant case, it is not disputed that consequent upon
the directions issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India vs.
Ashish Agarwal (2023) 1 SCC 617, the Assessing Officer issued fresh
notice u/s. 148 of the Act on 30.07.2022, which is stated by the assessee
to be beyond the period of limitation.
It is relevant to refer paragraph 19 (e) and 19(f) from the decision of
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal (supra), which sets out the
concession as made on behalf of the Revenue.
“19. a. ………………….. b. ………………….. c. …………………… d. ………………….. e. The Finance Act 2021 substituted the old regime for re-assessment with a new regime. The first proviso to Section 149 does not expressly bar the application of TOLA. Section 3 of TOLA applies to the entire Income Tax Act, including Sections 149 and 151 of the new regime. Once the first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) is read with TOLA, then all the notices issued between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 pertaining to assessment years 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 will be within the period of limitation as explained in the tabulation below:
4 | P a g e
ITA No.427/Agr/2025
Assessment Within 3 years Expiry of Limitation Within 6 years Expiry of limitation year read with TOLA for read with TOLA for (2) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 2013-2014 31.03.2017 TOLA not 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 applicable 2014-2015 31.03.2018 TOLA not 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 applicable 2015-2016 31.03.2019 TOLA not 31.03.2022 TOLA not applicable applicable 2016-2017 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 31.03.2023 TOLA not applicable 2017-2018 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 31.03.20 TOLA not 24 applicable
f. The Revenue concedes that for the assessment year 2015-16, all notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 will have to be dropped as they will not fall for completion during the period prescribed under TOLA; ……………….”
It is now crystal clear from the aforesaid decision of apex court in
Rajeev Bansal (supra) that all notices relevant to the assessment year
2015-16 issued on or after 01.04.2021 will have to be dropped, as they
will not fall for completion during the period prescribed under the taxation
and other laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA). In
the instant case, the notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued on 30.07.2022
beyond the period of limitation, hence, time barred and bad in law, is
quashed. All consequential assessment proceedings are accordingly
quashed. Aforesaid issue is determined in favour of the assessee. The
5 | P a g e
ITA No.427/Agr/2025
other ground is mere academic in nature, which need not be adjudicated
upon.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 15.01.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 15.01.2026 *aks/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Agra
6 | P a g e
