← All Phrases

“Section 195(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 195Section 195(1)240 judgments

SUPERHOUSE LIMITED,KANPUR vs. CIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, DELHI, DELHI

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 356/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos. 356 & 357/Lkw/2024 A.Ys. 2014-15 & A.Ys. 2015-16 Superhouse Limited, 150 Feet Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Road, Jajmau, Kanpur-208010 International Taxation-3, Delhi Pan: Aabcs9328K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. G.C. Srivastava, Adv & Sh. Kalrav Mehrotra, Adv Revenue By: Sh. R.K. Agarwal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 03.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.02.2026 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: These Two Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Cit, (International Taxation)-3, Delhi Passed Under Section 263 Of The Act For The A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16, Both Dated 29.03.2024, Wherein The Ld. Cit Has Set Aside The Earlier Orders Of The Assessing Officer For Making Of Fresh Orders In Accordance With The Directions Issued By Her. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “1. Because, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit Has Erred In Assuming Jurisdiction Under Section 263 Of The Act & In Doing So, Has Sought To Substitute His Opinion With The Order Under Section 201(1)/201(1A) Passed After Undertaking Extensive & Detailed Consideration Of The Issue By The Ito (Tds). 2. Because, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit Has Erred In Assuming The Jurisdiction Under Section 263 Of The Act Without Appreciating That The Order Under Section 201(1)/201(1A) Passed By The Ito (Tds) Was Unerring & In Consonance With The Settled Principles Of Law. 3. Because, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Impugned Order While Premised On An Illegal Assumption Of Jurisdiction, Further Suffers From Non-Application Of Mind Since The Submissions Of The Assessee Have Not Been Considered [As Illustrated Infra]. A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16

For Appellant: Sh. G.C. Srivastava, Adv & Sh. KalravFor Respondent: Sh. R.K. Agarwal, CIT DR
Section 201(1)Section 263Section 90

deemed to be accrued A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 in India, then there was no obligation on the assessee to deduct TDS under section 195(1) of the I.T. Act and consequently the provisions of section 40(a)(i) would not apply. The ld. AR also referred to the decision ... accrue or arisen or deemed to accrue or arise in India. Hence, there would be no liability to deduct tax at source under section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act and provisions of section 40(a)(i) of the I.T. Act could not be invoked

BA CONTINUUM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 368/HYD/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 10ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 40

Finance Corporation and M/s. CW(UK) Services without any deduction of tax at source (TDS), i.e., in the violation of the provisions of section 195(1) of the Act which attracted the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act; and (ii) and though the assessee company had during

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),AGRA, AGRA vs. EMCO EXPORTS, AGRA

In the result, revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 415/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Agra15 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: : Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2020-21

Section 195Section 250Section 40Section 9

furnish the information relating to payment of any sum in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Board.” 7. Under Section 195(1), the tax has to be deducted at source from interest (other than interest on securities) or any other sum (not being ... date on which such tax was deductible to the date on which such tax is actually paid. The most important expression in Section 195(1) consists of the words “chargeable under the provisions of the Act”. A person paying interest or any other sum to a non-resident

DCIT, CIRCLE 3 4, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of both, revenue and assessee are partly\nallowed for all the three

ITA 2244/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 92CSection 92C(3)

resident agents is not\nchargeable to tax in India at their hands, there is no necessity for the assessee\nto withhold tax under section 195(1) of the Act on such payment. Accordingly,\nwe uphold the decision of learned Commissioner (Appeals) on this issue.\nRespectfully following the decision

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 3(4), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of both, revenue and assessee are partly\nallowed for all the three

ITA 1517/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 92CSection 92C(3)

resident agents is not\nchargeable to tax in India at their hands, there is no necessity for the assessee\nto withhold tax under section 195(1) of the Act on such payment. Accordingly,\nwe uphold the decision of learned Commissioner (Appeals) on this issue.\nRespectfully following the decision

DELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 16(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 351/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40

since the said payments were not chargeable to tax under the Act and therefore it was required to deduct tax at source under section 195(1) of the Act. The assessee further submitted that the provisions of section 40(a)(i) are attracted only when any sum chargeable under

DELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 16(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 350/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40

since the said payments were not chargeable to tax under the Act and therefore it was required to deduct tax at source under section 195(1) of the Act. The assessee further submitted that the provisions of section 40(a)(i) are attracted only when any sum chargeable under

DELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 320/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40

since the said payments were not chargeable to tax under the Act and therefore it was required to deduct tax at source under section 195(1) of the Act. The assessee further submitted that the provisions of section 40(a)(i) are attracted only when any sum chargeable under

DELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 319/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwala, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

since the said payments were not\nchargeable to tax under the Act and therefore it was required to deduct tax at\nsource under section 195(1) of the Act. The assessee further submitted that the\nprovisions of section 40(a)(i) are attracted only when any sum chargeable under\nthe

PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP.,CANADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 2(2)(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals in ITA No

ITA 666/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vohra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Nikhil Kumar Govila, CIT-DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 153Section 234ASection 234B

technical and consultancy in nature, hence, quantifies as FTS requiring withholding of tax under section 195. 19. On a careful reading of section 195(1) of the Act, it is very much clear that the provision gets triggered only when payment made to the non-resident entity is chargeable

PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP.,CANADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 2(2)(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals in ITA No

ITA 665/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vohra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Nikhil Kumar Govila, CIT-DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 153Section 234ASection 234B

technical and consultancy in nature, hence, quantifies as FTS requiring withholding of tax under section 195. 19. On a careful reading of section 195(1) of the Act, it is very much clear that the provision gets triggered only when payment made to the non-resident entity is chargeable

PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA (SEA) PTE. LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 2(2)(2), NEW DELHI , NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals in ITA No

ITA 626/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vohra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Nikhil Kumar Govila, CIT-DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 153Section 234ASection 234B

technical and consultancy in nature, hence, quantifies as FTS requiring withholding of tax under section 195. 19. On a careful reading of section 195(1) of the Act, it is very much clear that the provision gets triggered only when payment made to the non-resident entity is chargeable

PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA (SEA) PTE. LTD.,SINGAPORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 2(2)(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, assessee’s appeals in ITA No

ITA 620/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Rajan Vohra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Nikhil Kumar Govila, CIT-DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 153Section 234ASection 234B

technical and consultancy in nature, hence, quantifies as FTS requiring withholding of tax under section 195. 19. On a careful reading of section 195(1) of the Act, it is very much clear that the provision gets triggered only when payment made to the non-resident entity is chargeable

SHELL INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -4(2)(1),, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4712/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Smt. Renu Jauhrishell International Dy. Commissioner Of Petroleum Company Income –Tax (International Limited Taxation) 4(2)(1), Mumbai C/O B S R & Co. Llp, 2Nd 17Th Floor, Room No. 1708, Air Vs. Floor, Lodha Excelus, India Building, Nariman Point, Apollo Mills Compound, Mumbai N.M. Joshi Marg, Mahalakshmi, Mumbai 400011 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaics0357B (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्ााररतीकीओरसे/ Assessee By: Shri. Madhur Agrawal/ Ms. Reema Grewal /Revenue By: Shri Satya Pal Kumar Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing 06.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30.09.2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Renu Jauhri [A.M]: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Dy. Cit (It), Mumbai Dated 27.09.2023 Passed As Per The Directions Of The Dispute Resolution Panel (Drp) U/S. 144C(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As "Act"] For Assessment Year [A.Y.] 2021-22. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri. Madhur Agrawal/For Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 153Section 2(24)Section 9(1)(vi)

Supreme Court held that considering the provisions of DTAA, there was no obligation on the persons mentioned in Section 195(1) of the Act to deduct tax at source as the distribution agreements, in the facts of the case did not create any interest or right in such distributors/end users

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 766/BANG/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2025AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 153ASection 153CSection 292Section 69C

office of the Commissioner (Appeals).\n(5) Not to be filled in if the appeal relates to tax deducted under section 195(1).\n(6) If the space provided herein is insufficient, separate enclosures may be used for the purpose.\n(7) If appeals are pending in relation to more

ACIT , SPL. RANGE-9, NEW DELHI vs. TIMEX GROUP INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7598/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar\Nand\Nshri Brajesh Kumar Singh\Nita No.7526/Del/2019\N[Assessment Year: 2013-14]\N\Nm/S Timex Group India Ltd.\N106-107, Ambadeep Building,\Nkasturba Gandhi Marg,\Nnew Delhi-110001\Npan-Aaact0773C\Nassessee\Nvs\Nadditional Commissioner Of Income\Ntax, Special Range-9,\Nnew Delhi-110002\Nrevenue\Nita No.7598/Del/2019\N[Assessment Year: 2013-14]\N\Nadditional Commissioner Of\Nincome Tax, Special Range-9,\Nnew Delhi-110002\Nm/S Timex Group India Ltd.\N106-107, Ambadeep Building,\Nvs Kasturba Gandhi Marg,\Nnew Delhi-110001\Npan-Aaact0773C\Nrevenue\Nassessee\Nassessee By\Nshri Tushar Jarwal, Adv.\Nshri Aayush Nagpal, Adv. &\Nshri Vikrant Maheshwari, Adv.\Nrevenue By\Nshri Rohit Garg, Cit-Dr\Ndate Of Hearing\N01.07.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N26.09.2025\Norder\Nper Brajesh Kumar Singh, Am,\Nthese Are Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As By\Nthe Revenue, Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of\Nincome Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi, Dated 28.06.2019 Arising\Nfrom The Assessment Order Dated 07.02.2017 Passed Under\Nsection 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred\Nto As 'The Act') Relating To Assessment Year 2013-14.\N1.

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 92Section 92BSection 92C

relating to payment of any sum in such form and manner\nas may be prescribed by the Board.\"\nThe most important expression in section 195(1) consists of the words\n\"chargeable under the provisions of the Act\". A person paying interest\nor any other sum to a non-resident ... income\nchargeable under the Act.\n4. This obligation being limited to the appropriate proportion of\nincome flows from the words used in section 195(1), namely,\n\"chargeable under the provisions of the Act\". It is for this reason that\nvide Circular No. 728 dated October 30, 1995 the Central

TIMEX GROUP INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDI. CIT SPL.RANGE-9, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7526/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2013-14] M/S Timex Group India Ltd. Additional Commissioner Of Income 106-107, Ambadeep Building, Tax, Special Range-9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, Vs New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaact0773C Assessee Revenue [Assessment Year: 2013-14] Additional Commissioner Of M/S Timex Group India Ltd. Income Tax, Special Range-9, 106-107, Ambadeep Building, New Delhi-110002 Vs Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 Pan-Aaact0773C Revenue Assessee Assessee By Shri Tushar Jarwal, Adv. Shri Aayush Nagpal, Adv. & Shri Vikrant Maheshwari, Adv. Revenue By Shri Rohit Garg, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 01.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.09.2025

Section 143(3)Section 40Section 92Section 92BSection 92C

relating to payment of any sum in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Board." The most important expression in section 195(1) consists of the words "chargeable under the provisions of the Act". A person paying interest or any other sum to a non-resident ... income chargeable under the Act. 4. This obligation being limited to the appropriate proportion of income flows from the words used in section 195(1), namely, "chargeable under the provisions of the Act". It is for this reason that vide Circular No. 728 dated October 30, 1995 the Central Board

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 724/COCH/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Gopi K, CAFor Respondent: Shri Omanakuttan, Snr. AR
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH : COCHIN BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 723/COCH/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Gopi K, CAFor Respondent: Shri Omanakuttan, Snr. AR
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH : COCHIN BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 722/COCH/2023[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Sept 2025AY 2007-08
Section 195Section 201Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nCOCHIN BENCH : COCHIN\nBEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nAND\nSHRI

Showing 1–20 of 240 · Page 1 of 12

...