← All Phrases

“Section 155(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 155Section 155(1)7 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 155(1) is CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. (103 Taxmann.com 57), cited in 306 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 155(1)

CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd.
103 Taxmann.com 57 · 2019 · Supreme Court
306
citing judgments

The Supreme Court holds that the issue of payment of excessive price on purchase of sugarcane by assesses is no longer res integra. The court elaborately dealt with this issue.

Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India
155 ITR 120 · 1985 · Supreme Court
229
citing judgments

For computing the deduction under Section 80M, only the net dividend income (gross dividend income after reducing expenses attributable to earning it, as per Section 57(iii) and the principle in Section 80AB) is eligible. The case also holds that tax authorities are not bound to perpetuate an error from a previous assessment year, as each year is a separate unit and consistency cannot override substantive justice.

Assessing Officer (International Taxation) v. Nestle SA
458 ITR 756 · 2023 · Supreme Court
122
citing judgments

The benefit of a Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause in a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) is available only upon notification by the Government. A notification under section 90(1) is a necessary and mandatory condition for giving effect to a DTAA or any protocol that alters existing law.

CIT v. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation
284 ITR 582 · 2006 · High Court
73
citing judgments

Funds received by an entity acting as a nodal agency or agent of the government for implementing specific government schemes, or income generated from such funds (like lease premiums or interest), are not taxable in the hands of the agency if held on behalf of or remitted to the government.

Dr. Partap Singh v. Director of Enforcement
155 ITR 166 · 1985 · Supreme Court
52
citing judgments

The phrase "so far as may be" in a statutory provision indicates that the referred procedures, such as those for conducting searches, are to be generally followed to the extent possible, meaning they are not mandatory in every minute detail but applied practically.

CIT v. Mother India Refrigeration Industries (P.) Ltd.
155 ITR 711 · 1985 · Supreme Court
47
citing judgments

Legal fictions and deeming provisions are created for definite purposes and must be limited strictly to that purpose, not extended beyond their legitimate field or the explicit mandate of the section. This principle requires strict interpretation of such provisions.

CIT v. Bacardi Martini India Ltd.
288 ITR 585 · 2007 · High Court
39
citing judgments

Penalty for concealment of income cannot be imposed merely due to a difference of opinion between the taxpayer and the Assessing Officer; there must be an intention to evade tax liability.

Tanmac India v. DCIT
78 Taxmann.com 155 · 2017 · High Court
36
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings are not justified if initiated based on material already on record, as this constitutes a mere change of opinion and not the discovery of fresh tangible material.

Judgments citing Section 155(1)