← All Phrases

“advancement of general public utility”

Charitable TrustsSection 2(15)Section 2(15)173 judgments

MAHA ACADAMY OF PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY,NAGPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 217/NAG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Mar 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roymaha Academy Of Pediatric Cit (Exemptions), Pune Neurology, Plot No.7, Block Vs Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, Guru Balawantsing Compound, Near Lokmat Building, Patwardhan Ground, Nagpur-440012. Pan : Aaqam 4626 H Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pranav Ashtikar, Ca Revenue By : Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 24.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.03.2026

For Appellant: Shri Pranav Ashtikar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

conclusion that the proviso applies is misplaced. Even assuming, arguendo, that the assessee’s activities fall under “advancement of general public utility,” the condition precedent for invoking the proviso—receipts exceeding 20% of total income from commercial activities—is not satisfied, as delegate fees amount to only 12.6% of total

MICRO FINANCE INDUSTRY NETWORK,GURGAON vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 5879/DEL/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES : G : NEW DELHI\nBEFORE MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND

MICRO FINANCE INDUSTRY NETWORK,GURGAON vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 5878/DEL/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES : G : NEW DELHI\nBEFORE MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE-1, , BANGALORE

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee in both the appeals\nare allowed except the limitation ground

ITA 355/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Sudheendra B.R, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shivanand H Kalakeri, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 153(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 43B

nand powers are frame all with a view to achieve industrial\ndevelopment in Karnataka. Development of industries has\nbeen construed to be ‘advancement of general public utility'\nby the Apex Court. Activities of the assessee are therefore\nto be regarded as covered within the operative provisions\nof section

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee in both the appeals\nare allowed except the limitation ground

ITA 354/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Sudheendra B.R, AdvocateFor Respondent: \nShri Shivanand H Kalakeri, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 13(8)Section 153(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 43B

nand powers are frame all with a view to achieve industrial\ndevelopment in Karnataka. Development of industries has\nbeen construed to be ‘advancement of general public utility'\nby the Apex Court. Activities of the assessee are therefore\nto be regarded as covered within the operative provisions\nof section

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 653/RPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 649, 650, 651, 652 & 653/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Sector-19, Paryavaas Bhawan, Tax (Exemption) Circle, Income Tax Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002 Office, Quarter No.1, Type-V, Income Tax Residential Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aaeca9783D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Shubham Mehta, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, Cit-Dr Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 17/02/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

income and expenditure statement furnished by it before AO. 6.2.2 During the assessment proceedings the AO examined the issue of advancement of general public utility in the case of the appellant. The discussion made by AO with respect to the advancement of general public utility is reproduced: ........................................................................ …………………………………………………… Since the contract

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 652/RPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 649, 650, 651, 652 & 653/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Sector-19, Paryavaas Bhawan, Tax (Exemption) Circle, Income Tax Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002 Office, Quarter No.1, Type-V, Income Tax Residential Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aaeca9783D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Shubham Mehta, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, Cit-Dr Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 17/02/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

income and expenditure statement furnished by it before AO. 6.2.2 During the assessment proceedings the AO examined the issue of advancement of general public utility in the case of the appellant. The discussion made by AO with respect to the advancement of general public utility is reproduced: ........................................................................ …………………………………………………… Since the contract

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 651/RPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 649, 650, 651, 652 & 653/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Sector-19, Paryavaas Bhawan, Tax (Exemption) Circle, Income Tax Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002 Office, Quarter No.1, Type-V, Income Tax Residential Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aaeca9783D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Shubham Mehta, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, Cit-Dr Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 17/02/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

income and expenditure statement furnished by it before AO. 6.2.2 During the assessment proceedings the AO examined the issue of advancement of general public utility in the case of the appellant. The discussion made by AO with respect to the advancement of general public utility is reproduced: ........................................................................ …………………………………………………… Since the contract

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 650/RPR/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 649, 650, 651, 652 & 653/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Sector-19, Paryavaas Bhawan, Tax (Exemption) Circle, Income Tax Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002 Office, Quarter No.1, Type-V, Income Tax Residential Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aaeca9783D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Shubham Mehta, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, Cit-Dr Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 17/02/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

income and expenditure statement furnished by it before AO. 6.2.2 During the assessment proceedings the AO examined the issue of advancement of general public utility in the case of the appellant. The discussion made by AO with respect to the advancement of general public utility is reproduced: ........................................................................ …………………………………………………… Since the contract

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EXEMPTION CIRCLE,, RAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed as above for statistical purposes

ITA 649/RPR/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Raipur17 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos: 649, 650, 651, 652 & 653/Rpr/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Sector-19, Paryavaas Bhawan, Tax (Exemption) Circle, Income Tax Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002 Office, Quarter No.1, Type-V, Income Tax Residential Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001 Pan: Aaeca9783D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Shubham Mehta, Ca राज" की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, Cit-Dr Dr. Priyanka Patel, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of : 17/02/2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am: Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Raj Kumar Ghosh, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

income and expenditure statement furnished by it before AO. 6.2.2 During the assessment proceedings the AO examined the issue of advancement of general public utility in the case of the appellant. The discussion made by AO with respect to the advancement of general public utility is reproduced: ........................................................................ …………………………………………………… Since the contract

CENTRE FOR E-GOVERNANCE ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, CIRCLE-1 , BANGALORE

ITA 936/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri S Parthasarthi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shivanand H Kalakeri, CIT (DR)
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)

such projects. Therefore, the assessee contended that the interest income was directly linked with the charitable objects of the society, which involved advancement of general public utility within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act. 7. On examination of the Receipts & Payments Account and the Income & Expenditure Account

THE MYSORE ASSOCIATION BOMBAY,MATUNGA - MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION WARD 2(4), MUMBAI, LAL BAUG , PAREL

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5860/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: JUSTICE (RETD.) C. V. BHADANG (President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Satyaprakash SinghFor Respondent: Shri Kavan N. Limbasiya, Sr.DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 250

auditorium and conference hall which is given on rent with the motive of earning profit and, therefore, the assessee is involved in advancement of general public utility with a profit motive and the Assessing officer thereafter denied claim of exemption u/s 11 of the Act. 3. The assessee thereafter carried

JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSICIATION,DHANBAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 328/RAN/2024[AY 2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Assessment Years: 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association............................……….……Appellant Tiwari Market, Bank More, Tiwari Gali, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 826001. [Pan: Aacaj6085D] Vs. Cit (Exemption), Patna.....…...…..….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri M. K. Choudhury, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Swaroop Singh, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 30, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 12, 2025 Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: All The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee For The Assessment Years 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Against Separate Orders All Dated 25.05.2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(E)’] Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab For Grant Of Regular Registration U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. Ita No.307/Ran/2024 Is Taken As Lead Case For Narration Of Facts.

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 07.04.2022. The assessee society is involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act but the same ... registered society and the assessee has been granted provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act and the assessee society was involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for regular registration u/s 12A of the Act. We also find that

JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSOCIATION,DHANBAD vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 327/RAN/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Assessment Years: 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association............................……….……Appellant Tiwari Market, Bank More, Tiwari Gali, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 826001. [Pan: Aacaj6085D] Vs. Cit (Exemption), Patna.....…...…..….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri M. K. Choudhury, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Swaroop Singh, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 30, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 12, 2025 Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: All The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee For The Assessment Years 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Against Separate Orders All Dated 25.05.2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(E)’] Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab For Grant Of Regular Registration U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. Ita No.307/Ran/2024 Is Taken As Lead Case For Narration Of Facts.

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 07.04.2022. The assessee society is involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act but the same ... registered society and the assessee has been granted provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act and the assessee society was involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for regular registration u/s 12A of the Act. We also find that

JHARKHAND INDUSTRIES & TRADE ASSOCIATION,DHANBAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 307/RAN/2024[2022-23 to 2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi12 Nov 2025

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Assessment Years: 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association............................……….……Appellant Tiwari Market, Bank More, Tiwari Gali, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 826001. [Pan: Aacaj6085D] Vs. Cit (Exemption), Patna.....…...…..….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri M. K. Choudhury, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Swaroop Singh, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 30, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : November 12, 2025 Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: All The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee For The Assessment Years 2022-23, 2023-24 & 2024-25 Against Separate Orders All Dated 25.05.2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(E)’] Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab For Grant Of Regular Registration U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In All The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. Ita No.307/Ran/2024 Is Taken As Lead Case For Narration Of Facts.

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

Nos.307, 327 & 328/Ran/2024 Jharkhand Industries & Trade Association 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act on 07.04.2022. The assessee society is involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act but the same ... registered society and the assessee has been granted provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act and the assessee society was involved in advancement of general public utility. The assessee filed an application in Form 10AB on 29.11.2023 for regular registration u/s 12A of the Act. We also find that

GIA INDIA,MUMBAI vs. A/DCIT (E) - 1(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 5429/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri. Swapnil Choudhary Sr. AR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(4)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 250

assessee. After perusing the various details furnished by the assessee the AO held that the activities of the assessee are for advancement of general public utility in nature and is hit by the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act,as the assessee has undertaken activities ... under section 10(23C) of the Act if they carry on commercial activities. The activities of the appellant are of advancement of general public utility nature and it had conducted various courses throughout the year in exchange of consideration for imparting the training to them, it is hit by first

GIA INDIA,MUMBAI vs. A/DCIT (E) - 1(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 5428/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri. Swapnil Choudhary Sr. AR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(4)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 250

assessee. After perusing the various details furnished by the assessee the AO held that the activities of the assessee are for advancement of general public utility in nature and is hit by the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act,as the assessee has undertaken activities ... under section 10(23C) of the Act if they carry on commercial activities. The activities of the appellant are of advancement of general public utility nature and it had conducted various courses throughout the year in exchange of consideration for imparting the training to them, it is hit by first

GIA INDIA,MUMBAI vs. A/DCIT (E) - 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 5427/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri. Swapnil Choudhary Sr. AR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(4)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 250

assessee. After perusing the various details furnished by the assessee the AO held that the activities of the assessee are for advancement of general public utility in nature and is hit by the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act,as the assessee has undertaken activities ... under section 10(23C) of the Act if they carry on commercial activities. The activities of the appellant are of advancement of general public utility nature and it had conducted various courses throughout the year in exchange of consideration for imparting the training to them, it is hit by first

GIA INDIA,MUMBAI vs. A/DCIT (E) - 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 5426/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri. Swapnil Choudhary Sr. AR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(4)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 250

assessee. After perusing the various details furnished by the assessee the AO held that the activities of the assessee are for advancement of general public utility in nature and is hit by the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act,as the assessee has undertaken activities ... under section 10(23C) of the Act if they carry on commercial activities. The activities of the appellant are of advancement of general public utility nature and it had conducted various courses throughout the year in exchange of consideration for imparting the training to them, it is hit by first

GIA INDIA,MUMBAI vs. A/DCIT (E) - 1(1), MUMBAI

ITA 5425/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri. Swapnil Choudhary Sr. AR
Section 10Section 11Section 11(4)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 250

assessee. After perusing the various details furnished by the assessee the AO held that the activities of the assessee are for advancement of general public utility in nature and is hit by the First Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act,as the assessee has undertaken activities ... under section 10(23C) of the Act if they carry on commercial activities. The activities of the appellant are of advancement of general public utility nature and it had conducted various courses throughout the year in exchange of consideration for imparting the training to them, it is hit by first

Showing 1–20 of 173 · Page 1 of 9

...