“Section 91(3)”

VIKASH AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 61(3), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

KANTA DEPURA,KOLKATA WEST BENGAL vs. I.T.O., WARD - 36(6), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

VIJAY MITTAL,VIZAC, A.P. vs. D.C.I.T., CIR - 1(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as\nwithdrawn

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be\nwithdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated\nAuthority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is\nrequired to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with\nintimation of payment

MANISHA MAJUMDER,PANAGARH vs. ITO, WARD - 1(4), DURGAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

SHAIKH EAUNUSH ALI,MEDINIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-40(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

CHITTARANJAN LOCOMOTIVE WORKS COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,CHITTARANJAN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE-1, ASANSOL, ASANSOL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

YUVRAAZ NOPANY,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 51(4), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

KANODIA VYAPAR COMPANY PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 9(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

SRI BARUN GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 10(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as\nwithdrawn

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed\nto be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated\nAuthority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is\nrequired to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with\nintimation of payment

SITANI TRADING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 9(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

MANOJ KUMAR JAJU,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 36(1), KOLKAKTA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

SUCCESS VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as\nwithdrawn

ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed\nto be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated\nAuthority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is\nrequired to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with\nintimation of payment

M/S. ANNAPURNA PROPERTIES,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 31, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Annapurna Properties, Dcit, Circle-31, Kolkata, C/O M/S. Salarpuria Jajodia Form No. 10B, Middleton & Co., Road, Vs 7, C.R. Avenue, 3Rd Floor Kolkata – 700016, Kolkata – 700072, West Bengal West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaefa5641D Present For: Appellant By : Shri Siddarth , Fca Respondent By : Shri Sailen Samadder, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 15.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.01.2025 O R D E R Per Rakesh Mishra:

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment

RAJ KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 37, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2013-14 Raj Kumar Agarwal Huf Asst. Cit, Circle 37, Kolkata, 15, Ganagdhar Babu 3, Govt. Place, Lane, Kolkata – 700001, Vs Eden House, Bow Bazar, West Bengal Kolkata – 700012, West Bengal (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aahhr3501E Present For: Appellant By : Shri S. S. Gupta, Fca Respondent By : Shri Sailen Samadder, Addl. Cit, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 24.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.01.2025 O R D E R Per Rakesh Mishra:

ITAT/CIT(A)/ JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment