VIJAY MITTAL,VIZAC, A.P. vs. D.C.I.T., CIR - 1(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per S. No. 10 of the Guidance Note 1/2024 on the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, appeals before the ITAT are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of a certificate by the Designated Authority, as per section 91(2) of the Scheme. Furthermore, section 91(3) requires the taxpayer to withdraw appeals and furnish proof. Since the assessee requested the withdrawal of the appeal, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The Tribunal also noted that if subsequent facts warranted a hearing on merits, the assessee would be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application for restoration. No specific amount in dispute was recorded. The assessment order and the CIT(A) order were not decided on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Vijay Mittal, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Gurugram, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2015-16. This order was passed against the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act, dated 14.12.2017. At the outset of the hearing, the assessee's authorized representative submitted that the assessee had filed Form 1 under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and was awaiting Form 2. Consequently, the assessee requested the withdrawal of the present appeal, to which the Departmental Representative did not object.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is deemed withdrawn upon the filing of a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, as per the Scheme's provisions and guidance notes. Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that having opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, by filing Form 1 and awaiting Form 2, the appeal should be withdrawn. The assessee relied on S. No. 10 of the Guidance Note 1/2024 on the provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 91(2),Section 91(3),Section 92(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
order
More judgments on Section 92(2)
- Eranthus Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8997/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT, Circle- 1(1)(1), International… vs Continental Engineering Corporation, GurgaonITA 7781/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed12 Feb 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT, Circle- 1(1)(1), International… vs Continental Engineering Corporation, GurgaonITA 2327/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed12 Feb 2026AY 2013-14
- Cbre Limited, Hong Kong vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 3786/DEL/2023[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Jan 2026
- Vikash Agarwal, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 61(3), KolkataITA 1896/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: Disposed10 Dec 2025AY 2014-2015
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026