← All Phrases

“Section 151(1)(ii)”

Section References (mined)Section 151Section 151(1)(ii)18 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 151(1)(ii) is ACIT v. ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd. (348 ITR 299), cited in 76 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 151(1)(ii)

ACIT v. ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd.
348 ITR 299 · 2012 · Supreme Court
76
citing judgments

Reopening assessment based on a mere re-look of accounts already furnished and assessed under section 143(3) is not permissible if there was no failure on the part of the assessee to make a true and full disclosure. The assessment cannot be reopened on the ground that income has escaped assessment merely by re-examining previously filed accounts.

CIT v. Uttam Chand Nahar
295 ITR 403 · 2007 · High Court
40
citing judgments

Proceedings under section 147 can be initiated if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. The satisfaction required for initiating reassessment proceedings under section 147 must be that of the Assessing Officer himself, based on recorded reasons, and any satisfaction required under section 151 must be endorsed on the Assessing Officer's reasons.

MGM Exports v. DCIT
72 Taxmann.com 321 · 2016 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings are invalid if the Assessing Officer proceeds without disposing of the assessee's preliminary objections.

Alag Property Construction (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
179 Taxmann.com 578 · 2025 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Sanction for reassessment proceedings under Section 151(i) must be obtained from the specified authority within the extended timeline provided by Section 3(1) of TOLA, especially when the three-year period for initiating reassessment expires during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Failure to obtain sanction from the correct authority renders the reassessment proceedings invalid.

Agnello Oswin Dias v. ACIT
161 Taxmann.com 16 · 2024 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Sanction for reassessment proceedings initiated after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year must be obtained from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCCIT) under Section 151(ii). The proviso to Section 151, inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2023, does not apply retrospectively to proceedings initiated before that date.

Ess Advertising (Mauritius) S. N. C. Et Compagnie v. Asstt. CIT (International Taxation)
437 ITR 1 · 2021 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Approval for issuing a notice under section 148, based on a standard phrase indicating it's a fit case, does not constitute an independent application of mind and is flawed in law.

Ananta Landmark (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
131 Taxmann.com 52 · 2021 · High Court
14
citing judgments

An assessment cannot be reopened under section 147 based on the same material that was available during the original assessment proceedings, especially if the Assessing Officer had already made inquiries and received explanations from the assessee. Reopening requires new tangible material, not merely a change of opinion.

CIT v. Uttaranchal Welfare Society
42 Taxmann.com 361 · 2014 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Section 68 has no application to donations disclosed as income by the assessee, and such income, if applied for the trust's objects, cannot be added back.

Judgments citing Section 151(1)(ii)

Megnanapuram Paccs, Tiruchendur vs. PCIT, Madurai

ITA 895/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:895/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Megnanapuram Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society 4/40, Megnanapuram Tiruchendur Road, Tiruchendur Thoothukudi – 628 210. [Pan: Aabam-9847-M] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) Pcit Vs. Madurai - I (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19.09.2025 आदेश /Order Per S. R. Raghunatha, Am : This Appeal By The Assessee Is Filed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pcit, Madurai - 1, For The Assessment Year 2018-19, Vide Order Dated 17.03.2025. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: :-2-:

For Appellant: Shri. N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 80P

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH, CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक