“Section 36(1)(via)”

Section References (mined)Section 36Section 36(1)(via)69 judgments

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX , CHENNAI vs. M/S. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2544/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. C. Naresh, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Shiva Srinivas, CIT

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 36(1)(via)

Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”). However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction based on the Explanation (ia) of Section 36(1)(via) of the Act which defines a rural branch of a scheduled means a branch situated in place with population of not more than

JCIT(OSD), RANGE-10, NEW DELHI , C.R. BUILDING ITO vs. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD., KASTURBA NAGAR

ITA 609/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

For Appellant: \nShri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: \nMs. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nand\nSHRI

JCIT(OSD), RANGE-10, NEW DELHI , C.R. BUILDING ITO vs. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. , KASTURBA NAGAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in the AY 2020-21 and AY\n2021-22 are dismissed

ITA 579/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nand\nSHRI

JCIT(OSD), RANGE-10, NEW DELHI , CR BUILDING ITO vs. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. , KASTURBA NAGAR

ITA 578/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nand\nSHRI

JCIT(OSD), RANGE-10, NEW DELHI , ITO C.R. BUILDING vs. RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION LTD. , KASTURBA NAGAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in the AY 2020-21 and AY\n2021-22 are dismissed

ITA 577/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nand\nSHRI

REC LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT-10 (OSD), DELHI, NEW DELHI

ITA 320/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

REC LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT-10 (OSD), DELHI, NEW DELHI

ITA 319/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Taneja, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Pooja Swroop, CITDR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nDELHI BENCHES ‘B': NEW DELHI.\nBEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nand\nSHRI

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D,C,I.T., CIRCLE - 2, JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 975/KOL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Feb 2026AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA Before SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 2, JALPAIGURI, JALPAIGURI

ITA 974/KOL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Feb 2026AY 2012-2013

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nKOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA\nBefore\nSHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER\n&\nSHRI

RAIGANJ CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAIGANJ, UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. JCIT (TDS), RANGE - 6, SILIGURI

ITA 2237/KOL/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Feb 2026AY 2013-2014

Section 115Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\nKOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA\nBefore\nSHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER\n&\nSHRI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX NON CORP CIRCLE II MADURAI, MADURAI vs. VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OP BANK LIMITED, VIRUDHUNAGAR

ITA 2700/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Section 14ASection 36(1)(viia)

{ "clean_text": ":-2-:\nITA 2699 & 2700 Chny 2025 FY 2013-14, 2015-16\nIn CO-92 Cheny 2025 in ITA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NON CORP CIRCLE II MADURAI, MADURAI vs. VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OP BANK LIMITED, VIRUDHUNAGAR

ITA 2699/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Section 14ASection 36(1)(viia)

{"clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n'B' BENCH: CHENNAI\nसुश्री पद्मावती

DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 3039/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-19(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 2712/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI

SHRI RAJKOT DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2), RAJKOT , RAJKOT

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 196/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.196/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2011-12) Shri Rajkot District Co-Operative Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Bank Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1), Jilla Bank Bhavan, Kasturba Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Ring Opp. Chaudhary High School, Road, Rajkot-360001 Rajkot-360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afups2094H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Smt. Pallavi, Ld. Cit(Dr) : 06/08/2025 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement : 04/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay)-2018-19, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax Office [(In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] Vide Order Dated 29.12.2023, Which In Turn Assessment Order Passed By Income Tax Department / Assessing Officer Under Section 144C(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”), Vide Order Dated 30.03.2023 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee, Are As Follows:

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Pallavi, Ld. CIT(DR)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 263Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

rise to income which can be computed under any of the specific provisions of the Act. 2. There is no specific provision in section 36(1)(via) that the provision for bad and doubtful debts cannot be disturbed or that it should be maintained always. Contrary to this, in case

DCIT CIRCLE 3(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE CORPORATION BANK), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 60/BANG/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Nov 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Muthu Shankar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), BengaluruFor Respondent: Shri S. Ananthan, CA

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(vii)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL

DY..C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S STATE BANK OF MYSORE, BANGALORE

ITA 684/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved & Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray, Spl. Counsel

Section 2Section 250Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 41(1)

gets debited to the P&L A/c and claimed as a deduction under section 36(1)(viia). The assessee besides the deduction under section 36(1)(via) is also entitled for deduction under section 36(1)(vii) towards actual write off. The legislature restricts double deduction by proviso to section

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,BANGALORE vs. JCIT, BANGALORE

ITA 661/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved & Ninad PatadeFor Respondent: Shri P.C. Chhotaray, Spl. Counsel

Section 2Section 250Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 41(1)

DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK (EARLIER KNOWN AS ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE), DELHI

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 3161/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraassessment Year: 2017-18 Dcit, Vs. Punjab National Bank (Earlier Circle-19(1), Know As Oriental Bank Of Delhi Commerce), Harsha Bhawan, E Block, Connaught Place, Delhi Pan: Aaaco0191M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. K.V.S.R. Krishana, Ca Department By Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(Dr)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(2)(v)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI

RAMANATHANPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,RAMANATHAPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-1,, RAMNAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1415/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Shri. R. Prasanna Venkatesan, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, C.I.T

Section 143(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)

आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘ए’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एबी ट

Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4