PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-19(1), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue of carry forward of business losses to the AO for verification, allowing it for statistical purposes. The issues of bad debts and Section 115JB were also set aside to the AO for adjudication. The Revenue's grounds regarding Section 14A, Rule 37BA(2), and carried forward long-term capital loss were decided against the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The appeals by the assessee and Revenue were against the order of NFAC for AY 2020-21. The assessee's primary grievance was the disallowance of set-off of carry forward business losses. The assessee also raised additional grounds concerning bad debts and applicability of Section 115JB.
What were the issues?
Whether carry forward business losses, bad debts, and the applicability of Section 115JB were correctly handled. Also, the validity of disallowance under Section 14A and the treatment of TDS credit were examined.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(vii),Section 36(1)(viia),Section 115JB,Section 14A,Section 37BA(2),Section 143(3),Section 194A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing438 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘A’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, AM :-
ITA No. 2712 & 3039 /DEL/2024 Punjab National Bank [A.Y 2020-21]
Both the above captioned cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue are directed against the order of the NFAC, New Delhi dated
2024 pertaining to A.Y 2020-21 respectively.
Since common grievance is involved in the captioned appeals and pertain to same assessee, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
ITA No. 2712/DE
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(vii)
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- ITO-41.3.4, Mumbai vs Urmila Syntex, MumbaiITA 2458/MUM/2026[2013]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026
- Dar Housing Limited, Nct of Delhi vs DCIT Central Circle- 15, DelhiITA 1881/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Small Industries Development Bank of India… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9170/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026