Landmark Cases on Presumptive and Book Profits (MAT)

127 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

115JB of the Act. Similarly, in ACIT v. JSW Steel Ltd.
180 ITD 505 · 2020 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Receipts that are exempt from tax under the Income Tax Law cannot be included when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Act.

CIT v. Jindal Exports Ltd.
314 ITR 137 · 2009 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Amendments to explanations under Sections 234B and 234C were clarificatory, confirming that assessees were entitled to credit for MAT paid under Section 115JAA even before the amendment, by virtue of Section 140A.

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT and National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT
320 ITR 374 · 2010 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

For the purposes of computing book profits under Section 115JB, only reserves created through the profit and loss account can be added back. Reserves not debited to the profit and loss account do not qualify for addition.

NJ Jose and Company Private Limited v. CIT
321 ITR 132 · 2010 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Capital gains must be included when computing book profit under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Dynamic Orthopedics P.Ltd. v. CIT
321 ITR 300 · 2010 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

Depreciation need not be computed as per Schedule XIV of the Companies Act when computing profits for the purpose of Section 115J of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court expressed disagreement with the ratio laid down in Malayala Manorama.

Richa Global Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
54 SOT 185 · 2012 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

MAT credit under section 115JAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, includes surcharge and cess in the calculation of the entire component of taxes.

IOL Ltd. v. DCIT
81 TTJ 525 · 2003 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

A sum appropriated as a debenture redemption reserve in the profit and loss account cannot be considered a "reserve" or an amount set apart for unascertained liabilities under Section 115JB(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Bhagwati Oxygen Ltd. v. ACIT
167 ITD 645 · 2017 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

MAT credit under Section 115JAA of the Income-tax Act includes tax, surcharge, and cess for calculating the credit, as the bifurcation is for administrative convenience and does not change the character of the payment as 'tax'.

CIT v. Earth Tech Engineers
229 Taxmann 367 · 2015 · High Court
14
citing judgments

The assessing officer cannot arbitrarily apply a higher net profit rate than that accepted by the lower appellate authorities when the assessment is under a presumptive income scheme.

510 (Karnataka); (vii) PCIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd.
109 Taxmann 93 · 2019 · High Court
13
citing judgments

A capital receipt, not falling within the definition of 'income' under Section 2(24), cannot be brought to tax under the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions of Section 115JB, even if it relates to incentives like interest or power subsidy.

Sumer Builders (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, Central Circle- 36, Mumbai
19 Taxmann.com 43 · 2012 · Reported
13
citing judgments

For the purpose of Section 115JB, the Assessing Officer has the power to examine the company's accounts beyond their face value to ensure they comply with the Companies Act, 1956.

CIT v. DCM Sriram Consolidated Ltd.
322 ITR 486 · 2010 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Profits derived by an industrial undertaking from the business of generation or generation and distribution of power, even if consumed captively, are excludable for the purpose of calculating book profit under Explanation clause (iv) to Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act.

Integrated Coal Mining Ltd. v. DCIT
67 Taxmann.com 260 · 2016 · Reported
13
citing judgments

Disallowances under section 14A are not includible in book profit computed under section 115JB for the purpose of charging Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT).

Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT
91 Taxmann.com 104 · 2018 · Reported
13
citing judgments

Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) not being part of income-tax, is not required to be added back while arriving at book profits under Section 115JB. Taxes borne by the assessee on non-monetary perquisites provided to employees, akin to FBT, do not constitute income-tax.

Nand Lal Popli v. DCIT
71 Taxmann.com 246 · 2016 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Where an assessee's profit declared under section 44AD presumptive taxation is accepted, the Assessing Officer cannot make separate additions by invoking other sections like 69C or 68 for expenses or cash credits.

DCIT v. Syncom Formulations (I) Ltd.
106 ITD 193 · 2007 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 80HHC are eligible based on the computation of profits as per Section 115JA/115JB of the Income-tax Act, which relates to book profits.

CIT v. Shriram Ownership Trust
122 Taxmann.com 155 · 2020 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added to the book profit computed under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Virtusa (India) (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
157 ITD 1160 · 2016 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

MAT credit under Section 115JAA of the Income Tax Act, brought forward from earlier years, is to be set off against the tax on total income, including surcharge and education cess, rather than being adjusted before charging such surcharge and cess.

53 Taxman 485/183 ITR 420 (MP); Greatway (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
199 ITR 391 · 1999 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot extend relief against explicit legislative intent, even if hardship results. The plain text of a tax law must be followed.

64 Taxman 421/U993J 199 ITR 391 (Punj. & Har.); BM Parmar v. CIT
235 ITR 679 · 2000 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot extend relief against statutory provisions when the legislative intent is clear, adhering strictly to the letter of the law even if it appears to cause hardship.

Shree Balalji Alloys v. CIT
239 CTR 70 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Incentives received under the SHIS scheme are capital receipts, not chargeable under normal provisions, and are to be excluded from revenue and book profits for MAT purposes under Section 115JB.

Trivedi 183 ITR 420; Greatway v. CIT
247 ITR 40 · 2001 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot grant relief that contradicts legislative intent, even if it appears harsh, as the law must be applied as written.

Amline Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. ITO
27 SOT 152 · 2009 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The calculation of book profits under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be done on a composite and consolidated basis, not year-to-year. Unabsorbed depreciation and brought forward losses must be adjusted on an accumulated basis for set-off purposes.

(i). CIT v. IIpea Paramount P. Ltd.
336 ITR 54 · 2010 · High Court
12
citing judgments

A provision for gratuity made on an actuarial basis is deductible when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Sri Sakthi Textiles Ltd. v. JCIT
343 ITR 296 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The provision for bad and doubtful debts should be added back to the book profit for the purpose of computing the tax liability under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This is in line with decisions from other High Courts.

Duke Offshore Ltd. v. DCIT
45 SOT 399 · 2011 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Subsidies are to be excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The starting point for calculating book profits under Section 115JB is the figure after appropriations and extraordinary items, not the profit figure above the line.

(a) J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. ACJT
47 ITD 504 · 1993 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Reserves created otherwise than by debit to the profit and loss account, and not withdrawn, are excludable from book profits for the purpose of Section 115JB of the Act, especially when amendments are retrospective.