Landmark Cases on Presumptive and Book Profits (MAT)

147 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

Tirunelveli Motor Bus Service Co. P Ltd. v. CIT
78 ITR 55 · 1970 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

A provision written back and not considered taxable income for the year is not added to computed loss.

115JB of the Act. Similarly, in ACIT v. JSW Steel Ltd.
180 ITD 505 · 2020 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Receipts that are exempt from tax under the Income Tax Law cannot be included when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Act.

CIT v. Jindal Exports Ltd.
314 ITR 137 · 2009 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Amendments to explanations under Sections 234B and 234C were clarificatory, confirming that assessees were entitled to credit for MAT paid under Section 115JAA even before the amendment, by virtue of Section 140A.

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT and National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT
320 ITR 374 · 2010 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

The purpose behind introducing Section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was to bring into the tax net companies that were showing substantial book profits but paying no tax.

NJ Jose and Company Private Limited v. CIT
321 ITR 132 · 2010 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Only deductions and adjustments specifically provided for in Explanation 1 to section 115JB are permissible when computing book profits for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes. No further deductions or allowances are available beyond those stipulated.

Dynamic Orthopedics P.Ltd. v. CIT
321 ITR 300 · 2010 · Supreme Court
14
citing judgments

The Supreme Court in Dynamic Orthopedics P.Ltd. expressed disagreement with its earlier decision in Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. regarding the computation of depreciation for MAT purposes under Section 115J of the Income Tax Act.

Richa Global Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
54 SOT 185 · 2012 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

MAT credit under section 115JAA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, includes surcharge and cess in the calculation of the entire component of taxes.

IOL Ltd. v. DCIT
81 TTJ 525 · 2003 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

Amounts set aside for debenture redemption reserve cannot be treated as a 'reserve' or an amount set apart for unascertained liabilities under Section 115JB(1) Explanation clauses (b) or (c) if they represent an ascertained liability.

Bhagwati Oxygen Ltd. v. ACIT
167 ITD 645 · 2017 · ITAT
14
citing judgments

MAT credit under Section 115JAA of the Income-tax Act includes tax, surcharge, and cess for calculating the credit, as the bifurcation is for administrative convenience and does not change the character of the payment as 'tax'.

510 (Karnataka); (vii) PCIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd.
109 Taxmann 93 · 2019 · High Court
13
citing judgments
Sumer Builders (P) Ltd. v. DCIT, Central Circle- 36, Mumbai
19 Taxmann.com 43 · 2012 · Reported
13
citing judgments

For the purpose of Section 115JB, the Assessing Officer has the power to examine the company's accounts beyond their face value to ensure they comply with the Companies Act, 1956.

Harissons Malayalam Ltd. v. ACIT
32 SOT 497 · 2009 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Income exempt under Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, if credited to the Profit & Loss account, must be reduced from book profit for Section 115JB purposes.

CIT v. DCM Sriram Consolidated Ltd.
322 ITR 486 · 2010 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Profits derived by an industrial undertaking from the business of generation of power, including captive consumption, are eligible for exclusion under Explanation clause (iv) to Section 115JA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The contention that one cannot earn profit from business with oneself is rejected.

Integrated Coal Mining Ltd. v. DCIT
67 Taxmann.com 260 · 2016 · Reported
13
citing judgments

Disallowances under section 14A are not includible in book profit computed under section 115JB for the purpose of charging Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT).

Karnataka State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT
76 Taxmann.com 360 · 2016 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

The expression 'any income' in Section 10(38) refers to long-term capital gains computed under Section 48, which includes the indexed cost of acquisition. This principle applies when computing book profits under Section 115JB.

Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT
91 Taxmann.com 104 · 2018 · Reported
13
citing judgments

Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) not being part of income-tax, is not required to be added back while arriving at book profits under Section 115JB. Taxes borne by the assessee on non-monetary perquisites provided to employees, akin to FBT, do not constitute income-tax.

Nand Lal Popli v. DCIT
71 Taxmann.com 246 · 2016 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Where an assessee's profit declared under section 44AD presumptive taxation is accepted, the Assessing Officer cannot make separate additions by invoking other sections like 69C or 68 for expenses or cash credits.

DCIT v. Syncom Formulations (I) Ltd.
106 ITD 193 · 2007 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 80HHC are eligible based on the computation of profits as per Section 115JA/115JB of the Income-tax Act, which relates to book profits.

CIT v. Shriram Ownership Trust
122 Taxmann.com 155 · 2020 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added to the book profit computed under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Virtusa (India) (P) Ltd. v. DCIT
157 ITD 1160 · 2016 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

MAT credit under Section 115JAA of the Income Tax Act, brought forward from earlier years, is to be set off against the tax on total income, including surcharge and education cess, rather than being adjusted before charging such surcharge and cess.

53 Taxman 485/183 ITR 420 (MP); Greatway (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT
199 ITR 391 · 1999 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot extend relief against explicit legislative intent, even if hardship results. The plain text of a tax law must be followed.

64 Taxman 421/U993J 199 ITR 391 (Punj. & Har.); BM Parmar v. CIT
235 ITR 679 · 2000 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot extend relief against statutory provisions when the legislative intent is clear, adhering strictly to the letter of the law even if it appears to cause hardship.

Shree Balalji Alloys v. CIT
239 CTR 70 · Reported
12
citing judgments

Incentives received under the SHIS scheme are capital receipts, not chargeable under normal provisions, and are to be excluded from revenue and book profits for MAT purposes under Section 115JB.

Trivedi 183 ITR 420; Greatway v. CIT
247 ITR 40 · 2001 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Courts and tribunals cannot grant relief that contradicts legislative intent, even if it appears harsh, as the law must be applied as written.

Amline Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. ITO
27 SOT 152 · 2009 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

The calculation of book profits under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be done on a composite and consolidated basis, not year-to-year. Unabsorbed depreciation and brought forward losses must be adjusted on an accumulated basis for set-off purposes.

(i). CIT v. IIpea Paramount P. Ltd.
336 ITR 54 · 2010 · High Court
12
citing judgments
Sri Sakthi Textiles Ltd. v. JCIT
343 ITR 296 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

The provision for bad and doubtful debts should be added back to the book profit for the purpose of computing the tax liability under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This is in line with decisions from other High Courts.

Duke Offshore Ltd. v. DCIT
45 SOT 399 · 2011 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Subsidies are to be excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The starting point for calculating book profits under Section 115JB is the figure after appropriations and extraordinary items, not the profit figure above the line.

(a) J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. ACJT
47 ITD 504 · 1993 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Reserves created otherwise than by debit to the profit and loss account, and not withdrawn, are excludable from book profits for the purpose of Section 115JB of the Act, especially when amendments are retrospective.

CIT v. Veekaylal Investments Co. Ltd. vs. CIT
116 Taxmann 104 · 2001 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Losses incurred on capital reduction are not to be added back when computing book profits under section 115JB, as the section only allows for specified additions and deductions.

PCIT (Central)-1 v. Moon Star Securities Trade and Finance Co. (P) Ltd.
161 Taxmann.com 158 · 2024 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Disallowances made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act cannot be added to net profit when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Act (Minimum Alternate Tax).

DDIT v. Technip Offshore Contracting (
337 ITR 207 · 2011 · Reported
11
citing judgments

Service tax receipts collected by an assessee are to be considered part of its gross receipts for the purpose of presumptive determination of profit, similar to how sales tax collected forms part of business receipts.

ITO v. RBK Share Broking (P) Ltd.
37 Taxmann.com 128 · 2013 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Disallowances made under section 14A, including those related to book profits, are applicable when computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) liability under section 115JB. The disallowance survives for MAT computation to the extent it is valid under normal provisions.

DCIT v. M/s Sobha Developers
58 Taxmann.com 107 · 2015 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A cannot be added back for computing book profits under section 115JB, deviating from a divergent view.

Hitkari Fibres Ltd. v. JCIT (90 Mumbai ITAT
90 ITD 654 · 2004 · ITAT
11
citing judgments

Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) is levied on the real book profit earned by an assessee, not on artificial income credited to the profit and loss account. Capital receipts should not be included in MAT computation as it would defeat the object of sections 115JA/115JB.

CIT v. Weizmann Homes Ltd.
33 Taxmann.com 171 · 2013 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Lease equalization charges can be added back to book profits for calculating tax liability under Section 115JA when the Assessing Officer adjusts book profits.

Karthick Natarajan v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation
154 Taxmann.com 136 · 2023 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

The amended provisions of Section 115BBE, increasing the tax rate to 60%, are applicable from Assessment Year 2017-18 (Financial Year 2016-17) onwards, as the amendment pertains to an increased rate rather than a new imposition of tax.

ACIT vs Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd. 327ITR 369 (Guj) CIT v. English Electric Co. of India Ltd.
243 ITR 512 · 2000 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Excise duty is not includible in the valuation of closing stock if the assessee has not incurred the liability to pay the duty. The liability arises only upon manufacture and removal of excisable goods.

CIT, LTU v. Union Bank of India
263 Taxmann 685 · 2019 · High Court
10
citing judgments

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to banking companies governed by the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, prior to the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2012. This is because such companies were not subject to the provisions of Section 115JB before this amendment.

48 Kiran Fine Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT Hon'ble Supreme Court
288 Taxmann 635 · 2022 · Supreme Court
10
citing judgments
CIT v. HP Tourism Corpn. Ltd.
35 Taxmann.com 450 · 2013 · Reported
10
citing judgments

A provision made for employee leave encashment is an ascertained and definite liability, and therefore, it cannot be added back when computing book profit for the levy of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB.

Sumer Builders (P) Ltd. v. CIT
50 SOT 198 · 2012 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

The Assessing Officer can adjust the book profit by including profits from sale of investments which are not credited to the Profit & Loss account when computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB.

ACIT v. Nilgiri Tea Estate Ltd.
65 SOT 14 · 2014 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Income not falling within the purview of total income under section 5 of the Income Tax Act cannot be included in the computation of book profit under section 115JB, as Chapter XII-B does not extend the scope of total income.

100 ITD 173. (g) M/s. Balaram Manmani v. Asstt. CIT (Lucknow)
7 SOT 164 · 2006 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Section 115JB(1) of the Income Tax Act, read with Explanation 1(i), governs the computation of book profits for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) purposes.

DCIT v. Binani Industries Ltd.
82 Taxmann.com 320 · 2017 · Reported
10
citing judgments

Losses, including cash and depreciation losses, that have been adjusted or reduced from book profits in earlier assessment years continue to remain in the books of accounts and are available for further reduction from book profits in subsequent years until they are fully offset by profits.

CIT v. Pact Securities and Financials Ltd.
86 ITD 115 · 2003 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

The accounting methods prescribed by the ICAI can be relied upon for computing the turnover of shares and derivatives transactions.

Greaves Chitram Ud v. DCIT
9 SOT 143 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Gratuity liability, if based on actuarial valuation, is an ascertained liability and deductible from book profits.