Landmark Cases on Presumptive and Book Profits (MAT)

147 decisions, ranked by how many judgments on BharatTax rely on them.

CIT v. Hewlett Packard India
314 ITR 55 · 2009 · High Court
37
citing judgments

A provision for gratuity made on the basis of actuarial valuation is a revenue expenditure and allowable as a deduction in computing book profits for the purposes of section 115JB.

Torrent India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
35 Taxmann.com 300 · 2013 · High Court
36
citing judgments

Excess Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid by a company is refundable to the assessee, even though Section 115-O(4) states DDT is a final payment.

CIT v. Echjay Forgings (P) Ltd.
104 ITD 249 · 2007 · ITAT
35
citing judgments

Adjustments to book profits for Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB are limited to those explicitly provided for in the Explanation to Section 115JB of the Act.

Rain Commodities Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
40 SOT 265 · 2010 · ITAT
35
citing judgments

Transfer pricing adjustments cannot be added back to book profits under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, as they are not among the permissible adjustments listed in Explanation I to section 115JB(2). Exempt capital gains must be considered when computing book profits under section 115JB.

ACIT v. Vireet Investments Pvt. Ltd.
58 ITR 313 · 2017 · High Court
35
citing judgments

Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot be added while computing book profits under section 115JB of the Act. Expenses incurred to earn exempt income should be restricted to the exempt income earned.

CIT v. Gokal Das Images Private Limited
429 ITR 526 · 2020 · High Court
34
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A cannot be added back when computing book profit under Section 115JB, as Section 115JB is a complete code in itself.

ACIT v. Genus Electrotech Ltd.
72 Taxmann.com 101 · 2016 · ITAT
34
citing judgments

A Debenture Redemption Fund is considered an appropriation for creating a reserve and is a below-the-line adjustment, not falling under the categories of adjustments provided under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

CIT v. ING Vysya Bank Limited
422 ITR 116 · 2020 · High Court
34
citing judgments

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to banking companies due to unworkable machinery provisions, and amortization of investments under the HTM category as per RBI guidelines is allowable expenditure under Section 37(1).

CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd.
284 ITR 434 · 2006 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not attracted in cases where income is assessed under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions under section 115JB.

CIT v. Bhari Information Technology Systems (P.) Ltd.
340 ITR 593 · 2012 · Supreme Court
32
citing judgments

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is a self-contained code, meaning only adjustments specified within the section are to be considered for book profits. Deductions, such as under Section 80HHC, should be allowed based on book profits, not adjustments under Section 115JB.

Emami Ltd. v. CIT
337 ITR 470 · 2011 · High Court
32
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C cannot be levied on additional book profit if the liability to pay advance tax did not exist on the last date of advance tax payment.

Maharashtra State Electricity Board v. JCIT
82 ITD 422 · 2002 · ITAT
31
citing judgments

Statutory corporations engaged in power generation, due to their distinct statutory obligations, may not be subject to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB.

Shobha Developers Ltd. v. DCIT (LTU)
434 ITR 266 · 2021 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Disallowances made under section 14A, if deleted, cannot be added to book profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

DCIT v. Inox Leisure Ltd.
351 ITR 314 · 2013 · High Court
29
citing judgments

Subsidies received for setting up a unit or expanding an existing unit, or entertainment tax exemptions for such purposes, are capital in nature and not revenue. These can be reduced while computing book profits under MAT provisions.

CIT v. Metal & Chromium Plater (P.) Ltd.
415 ITR 123 · 2019 · High Court
29
citing judgments

In the context of Section 115J, capital gains are included for assessment. Unlike Sections 115JA and 115JB, Section 115J does not have specific provisions for adjustments to book profits.

CIT v. Subodh Gupta
54 Taxmann.com 343 · 2015 · High Court
29
citing judgments

In the absence of material to show a net profit rate, the presumptive net profit rate of 8% under section 44AD can be used for estimating income. However, this 8% is not a sacrosanct profit ratio and depends on the specific facts of each case.

Shivalik Venture (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
60 Taxmann.com 314 · 2015 · ITAT
29
citing judgments

Sales tax subsidies should be excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Kirloskar Systems Ltd.
40 Taxmann.com 124 · 2013 · High Court
29
citing judgments

Provisions for gratuity and leave encashment, based on actuarial valuation, are accrued liabilities and deductible for computing book profits under Section 115JB, following commercial practice and accountancy principles.

Allied Motors (supra); CIT v. Raman Lal Hathi
217 CTR 105 · Reported
28
citing judgments

Amendments to Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are curative and have retrospective effect, intended to clarify and remove anomalies. Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit must be set off against tax payable before computing advance tax liability to avoid absurd results.

PCIT v. J.J. Glastronics (P.) Ltd.
139 Taxmann.com 375 · 2022 · High Court
28
citing judgments

Additions made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, read with Rule 8D, cannot be considered for computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Act.

Finance Ltd. v. DCIT
395 ITR 291 · 2017 · High Court
26
citing judgments

MAT credit granted under section 115JAA should be inclusive of surcharge and cess.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE v. ING VYSYA BANK LTD.
114 Taxmann.com 506 · 2020 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied to insurance companies, banking companies, or companies engaged in the generation or supply of electricity. The preparation of profit and loss accounts under the Companies Act provisions does not override this exclusion.

2017. 2. CIT vs. Akshay Textile Trading & Agencies Pvt Ltd 304 ITR 401 (Bom). 3. CIT v. Adbhut Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.
338 ITR 94 · 2011 · High Court
25
citing judgments

The Bombay High Court clarifies that for the purpose of Section 115J (now Section 115JB), the total income of an assessee is to be computed first under the Income-tax Act, and then compared with the book profit.

148 STC 225 (SC) (II) Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. v. CIT
7 SCC 592 · 2006 · Reported
25
citing judgments

The case establishes that benefits flowing out of statutory provisions cannot be denied to an assessee company. It also suggests that if the legislature intends to exclude certain deductions (like under Section 80IB(10)) from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) calculations, a specific provision would be present in Section 115JB, similar to provisions found in Section 115JC.

CIT v. New Horizon Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd.
269 ITR 397 · 2004 · Supreme Court
23
citing judgments

Amounts set apart towards a molasses storage reserve fund are to be excluded from an assessee's total income, and expenditures allowed under normal provisions should also be allowed for book profit computation under Section 115JB.

CIT v. Vacment India
369 ITR 304 · 2014 · High Court
23
citing judgments

The High Court holds that tax credit cannot be claimed on surcharge and education cess. The calculation of MAT credit should be done after applying surcharge and education cess.

CIT v. Khaitan Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.
307 ITR 150 · 2008 · High Court
23
citing judgments

Prior period expenses and items debited below the line to the profit and loss account are part of the company's profit and loss account and must be considered for MAT computation under section 115JB. Provisions for ascertained liabilities like gratuity, if calculated actuarially, are also to be considered.

PCIT v. Atria Power Corporation Ltd.
142 Taxmann.com 413 · 2022 · Supreme Court
22
citing judgments

Disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added to the book profits computed for the purpose of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

CIT v. Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd.
74 Taxmann.com 163 · 2016 · High Court
22
citing judgments

Deductions under Section 80HHC are allowable while computing book profits under Section 115JA, even if the assessee has no taxable income under normal provisions.

DCIT v. Bombay Diamond Company Ltd.
33 DTR 59 · 2010 · ITAT
22
citing judgments

Notional income, which does not represent real profit or accrual for the company during the financial year, should be excluded when computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Beach Minerals Company Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT
64 Taxmann.com 218 · 2015 · Reported
21
citing judgments

Disallowances made under section 14A cannot be added back to book profits when computing taxable income under section 115JB. This interpretation has been consistently followed by tribunals.

44BB(2). DIT v. Mitchell Drilling International Pvt. Ltd.
62 Taxmann.com 24 · 2015 · High Court
21
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing presumptive income under Section 44BB(2), 'gross receipts' do not include service tax collected by the assessee and paid to the government, as it does not represent an amount paid to the assessee for services rendered in connection with mineral oil extraction.

ITO v. Suraj Jewellary (India) Ltd. (
21 SOT 79 · 2008 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Receipts that are not income in nature should be excluded from the profit and loss account before computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under section 115JB.

Surana Steels P Ltd. v. DCIT
237 ITR 777 · 1999 · Supreme Court
20
citing judgments

The Supreme Court interpreted the legislative intent behind introducing Section 115I, noting it aimed to tax prosperous zero-tax companies that paid dividends despite having profits. The case also discusses the principle of incorporation of statutes.

CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand
242 CTR 61 · 2011 · High Court
20
citing judgments

When an assessee opts for the presumptive taxation scheme under Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, offering income at a specified percentage of gross receipts, they are exempt from maintaining books of account and are not obligated to explain individual entries of cash deposits unless such entries lack nexus with the gross receipts.

UCO Bank v. DCIT
64 Taxmann.com 51 · 2015 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

The applicability of Section 115JB provisions is a matter for the Assessing Officer to consider, and judicial precedent, including the UCO Bank case, can be relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, this precedent may not hold good for assessment years post-amendment, particularly after Explanation 3 to Section 115JB was introduced.

CIT v. Raymonds Ltd.
71 DTR 265 · 2012 · High Court
20
citing judgments

The 'book profit' for the purpose of Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account prepared in accordance with the Companies Act, 1956.

Electricity Board v. Dy. CIT
196 Taxmann 1 · 2011 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Section 115JB, relating to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on book profits, is applicable to statutory corporations like the Kerala State Electricity Board.

Piramal Enterprises Ltd. v. Additional CIT
97 Taxmann.com 352 · 2018 · ITAT
18
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A for computing book profits under Section 115JB(2) is not permissible if the computation of income under Section 14A is not resorted to.

DDIT (Inti Tax) v. Technip Offshore Contracting BV
29 SOT 33 · 2009 · ITAT
17
citing judgments

Service tax received by an assessee is to be considered part of its gross receipts for the purpose of presumptive profit determination.

DCIT v. Beardsell Ltd.
244 ITR 256 · 2000 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Provisions made for unascertained liabilities, such as doubtful debts, cannot be excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JA or Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act.

CIT v. Natural Gems Ltd.
327 ITR 269 · 2010 · High Court
16
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not leviable on tax determined under the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions, especially when prevailing judicial pronouncements supported this view at the relevant time. However, subsequent Supreme Court decisions have clarified that interest is leviable even under MAT provisions.

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kerala State Electricity Board
447 ITR 193 · 2022 · Supreme Court
16
citing judgments

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court's decision regarding Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Shivshahi Punarvasan Prakalp Ltd. v. ITO
135 ITD 51 · 2012 · ITAT
16
citing judgments

Prior period expenses cannot be added to book profit when computing the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, as there is no provision for such adjustments.

14. Bata India Ltd. v. DCIT
180 ITD 464 · 2020 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

Expenditure disallowed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added to book profit for computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Sree Bhagawathy Textiles Ltd. v. CIT
199 Taxmann 14 · 2011 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Prior period expenses not debited to the profit and loss account cannot be reduced from the MAT computation. This is because such expenses are not covered by the explanations to Section 115JB and were not accounted for in the profit and loss statement.

CIT v. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd.
21 Taxmann.com 184 · 2012 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied when additions or disallowances are made under normal provisions but tax is levied under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions (Sections 115JB/115JC), as no tax is sought to be evaded in such a scenario.

CIT v. G Narasimhan
236 ITR 327 · 1999 · Supreme Court
15
citing judgments

Accumulated profits for the purpose of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) are to be computed in accordance with the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) rather than opening balances as per Indian GAAP. This case also touches upon the definition of 'transfer' under section 2(47).

Addl. CIT v. Bilakhia
49 Taxmann.com 91 · 2014 · Reported
15
citing judgments

Adjustments to book profits under Section 115JB are limited to items specifically mentioned in the Explanation to that section.

SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd. v. DCIT
72 Taxmann.com 239 · 2016 · High Court
15
citing judgments

MAT credit under Section 115JAA must be set off against the total tax liability, including surcharge and cess. This implies that cess forms part of the tax for the purpose of MAT credit adjustment.