Landmark Cases on Presumptive and Book Profits (MAT)

Transfer pricing adjustments cannot be added back to book profits under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, as they are not among the permissible adjustments listed in Explanation I to section 115JB(2). Exempt capital gains must be considered when computing book profits under section 115JB.

Disallowance under Section 14A cannot be added to book profits computed under Section 115JB. This is because the calculation of book profits under Section 115JB should not include notional expenses.

Section 115BBE applies to the amount of excess cash found and offered for taxation.

Disallowance under Section 14A cannot be added back when computing book profit under Section 115JB, as Section 115JB is a complete code in itself.

A Debenture Redemption Fund is considered an appropriation for creating a reserve and is a below-the-line adjustment, not falling under the categories of adjustments provided under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to banking companies due to unworkable machinery provisions, and amortization of investments under the HTM category as per RBI guidelines is allowable expenditure under Section 37(1).

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is not chargeable on book profits computed under section 115JB.

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is a self-contained code, meaning only adjustments specified within the section are to be considered for book profits. Deductions, such as under Section 80HHC, should be allowed based on book profits, not adjustments under Section 115JB.

Interest under sections 234B and 234C cannot be levied on additional book profit if the liability to pay advance tax did not exist on the last date of advance tax payment.

Statutory corporations engaged in power generation, due to their distinct statutory obligations, may not be subject to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB.

Disallowance made under Section 14A cannot be added back to book profit computed under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Subsidies received for setting up a unit or expanding an existing unit, or entertainment tax exemptions for such purposes, are capital in nature and not revenue. These can be reduced while computing book profits under MAT provisions.

In the context of Section 115J, capital gains are included for assessment. Unlike Sections 115JA and 115JB, Section 115J does not have specific provisions for adjustments to book profits.

In the absence of material to show a net profit rate, the presumptive net profit rate of 8% under section 44AD can be used for estimating income. However, this 8% is not a sacrosanct profit ratio and depends on the specific facts of each case.

The issue of whether MAT credit must be given prior to the computation of advance tax liability is debatable. Consequently, such issues cannot be subject to rectification proceedings under section 154.

Sales tax subsidies should be excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Provisions for gratuity and leave encashment, based on actuarial valuation, are accrued liabilities and deductible for computing book profits under Section 115JB, following commercial practice and accountancy principles.

Amendments to Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are curative and have retrospective effect, intended to clarify and remove anomalies. Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit must be set off against tax payable before computing advance tax liability to avoid absurd results.

Additions made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, read with Rule 8D, cannot be considered for computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Act.

MAT credit granted under section 115JAA should be inclusive of surcharge and cess.

Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act cannot be applied to insurance companies, banking companies, or companies engaged in the generation or supply of electricity. The preparation of profit and loss accounts under the Companies Act provisions does not override this exclusion.

The Bombay High Court clarifies that for the purpose of Section 115J (now Section 115JB), the total income of an assessee is to be computed first under the Income-tax Act, and then compared with the book profit.

The case establishes that benefits flowing out of statutory provisions cannot be denied to an assessee company. It also suggests that if the legislature intends to exclude certain deductions (like under Section 80IB(10)) from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) calculations, a specific provision would be present in Section 115JB, similar to provisions found in Section 115JC.

Amounts set apart towards a molasses storage reserve fund are to be excluded from an assessee's total income, and expenditures allowed under normal provisions should also be allowed for book profit computation under Section 115JB.

The High Court holds that tax credit cannot be claimed on surcharge and education cess. The calculation of MAT credit should be done after applying surcharge and education cess.

Prior period expenses and items debited below the line to the profit and loss account are part of the company's profit and loss account and must be considered for MAT computation under section 115JB. Provisions for ascertained liabilities like gratuity, if calculated actuarially, are also to be considered.

Disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added to the book profits computed for the purpose of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Deductions under Section 80HHC are allowable while computing book profits under Section 115JA, even if the assessee has no taxable income under normal provisions.

Notional income, which does not represent real profit or accrual for the company during the financial year, should be excluded when computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

This case is cited for the proposition that amounts set aside for a Molasses Storage Fund are relevant to determining the nature of a Debt Redemption Reserve, and whether it qualifies as a reserve or provision for unascertained liability under Section 115JB(2).

Disallowances made under section 14A cannot be added back to book profits when computing taxable income under section 115JB. This interpretation has been consistently followed by tribunals.

Capital receipts that do not constitute income under the Income-tax Act cannot be taxed by using the mechanism of Section 115JB. Section 115JB is not intended to bring all non-income items within the Act's scope.

The Supreme Court interpreted the legislative intent behind introducing Section 115I, noting it aimed to tax prosperous zero-tax companies that paid dividends despite having profits. The case also discusses the principle of incorporation of statutes.

When an assessee opts for the presumptive taxation scheme under Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, offering income at a specified percentage of gross receipts, they are exempt from maintaining books of account and are not obligated to explain individual entries of cash deposits unless such entries lack nexus with the gross receipts.

Decisions of the ITAT, including the Calcutta ITAT in UCO Bank, are followed by coordinate benches when deciding on the applicability of Section 115JB.

Amounts transferred to a Debenture Redemption Reserve are liable for exclusion when computing Book Profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.

Section 115JB, dealing with Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on book profits, is applicable to statutory corporations like the Kerala State Electricity Board. The court confirmed that such entities are subject to the provisions of Section 115JB.

Disallowance under Section 14A for computing book profits under Section 115JB(2) is not permissible if the computation of income under Section 14A is not resorted to.