SAP Labs Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

17 Taxmann.com 16High Court2012#10281 most cited
10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing SAP Labs Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. 24/7 CUSTOMER PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 228/BANG/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jun 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy Sit(Tp)A No. 228/Bang/2020 Assessment Year : 2005-06 M/S. 24/7 Customer Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Embassy Golflinks Business Commissioner Of Park, Income Tax, Challaghatta Village, Circle – 2 (1)(1), Off Intermediate Ring Road, Bangalore. Vs. Varthur Hobli, Bangalore – 560 071. Pan: Aaacz1014A Appellant Respondent : Shri Jeepan Nagpal & Mrs. Assessee By Pallavi Sharma, Ca : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue By Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 17-05-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-06-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against Order Dated 29/11/2019 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-2, Bangalore For A.Y. 2005- 06 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Grounds Of Appeal & Question Of Law: A) The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & In Fact Seeking Exact Comparability Under Tnnm?

For Respondent: Shri Jeepan Nagpal & Mrs
Section 10ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 228/Bang/2020 Assessment Year : 2005-06 M/s. 24/7 Customer Pvt. Ltd., The Deputy Embassy Golflinks Business Commissioner of Park, Income Tax, Challaghatta Village, Circle – 2 (1)(1), Off Intermediate Ring Road, Bangalore. Vs. Varthur Hobli, Bangalore – 560 071. PAN: AAACZ1014A APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri Jeepan Nagpal & Mrs. Assessee by Pallavi Sharma, CA : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue by CIT DR Date of Hearing : 17-05-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30-06-2022…

M/S. ATMECS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 187/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.187/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Atmecs Technologies Private Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Flat No.301, M J Towers, H-No.8-2-698, Ward -1(1)(1), Road No.12, Bengaluru. Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 034. Pan : Aamca 0792 J Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri. P.V.S.S.Prasad, Ca Respondent By : Shri. Arunkumar, Cit(Tp-2)(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 14.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.12.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. Vasudevan: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Final Order Of Assessment Dated 30.3.2021 By The National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi, (Hereinafter Referred To As The Assessing Officer, “Ao” In Short) Passed U/S.143(3) Read With Section 144C(13) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) In Relation To Ay 2016-2017. 2. The Assessee In Engaged In The Business Of Provision Of Software Development Services (Swd Services), To It’S Associated Enterprises

For Appellant: Shri. P.V.S.S.Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Arunkumar, CIT(TP-2)(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92(1)Section 92B(1)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.187/Bang/2021 Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Atmecs Technologies Private Limited, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Flat No.301, M J Towers, H-No.8-2-698, Ward -1(1)(1), Road No.12, Bengaluru. Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 034. PAN : AAMCA 0792 J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri. P.V.S.S.Prasad, CA Respondent by : Shri. Arunkumar, CIT(TP-2)(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru Date of hearing : 14.12.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 20.12.2021 O R D E R Per N. V. V…

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S SAMI LABS LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 966/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. K. Garodia & Shri. Laliet Kumari.T(Tp).A No.966/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle – 6(1)(1), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. Sami Labs Ltd, No.19/1 & 19/2, 1St Main, 2Nd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru 560058 Pan : Aadcs2549E .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Cherian K Baby, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Neera Malhothra, Jcit Heard On : 18.03.2019 Pronounced On : 22.03.2019 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Dcit, Circle -6(1)(1), Bengaluru, Dt.07.01.2015, Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.144C Of The Act, In Pursuance To The Directions Of The Drp, For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 02. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Effective Ground :

For Appellant: Shri. Cherian K Baby, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Neera Malhothra, JCIT
Section 143(3)

…IT(TP)A.966/Bang/2015 Page - 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH 'C', BENGALURU BEFORE SHRI. A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T(TP).A No.966/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 6(1)(1), Bengaluru .. Appellant v. Sami labs Ltd, No.19/1 & 19/2, 1st Main, 2nd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru 560058 PAN : AADCS2549E .. Respondent Assessee by : Shri. Cherian K Baby, CA Revenue by : Smt. Neera Malhothra, JCIT Heard on : 18.03.2019 Pronounced on : 22.03.2019 O R D E R PER LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER : T…

SAP Labs Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT (17 Taxmann.com 16) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax