DCIT, CC-5(4), , MUMBAI vs. SHRI RAJENDERKUMAR MIGLANI, MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed
ITA 2925/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Apr 2022AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm & S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2925/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Dcit, Central Circle-5(4) बिधम/ Rajindrakumar Miglani Room No.1927, 19Th Floor, Uttam House, 69, P „Dmello Vs. Air India Building, Nariman Road, Carnac Bunder, Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400009. & Cross Objection No.20/Mum/2021 आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No. 2925/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Rajindrakumar Miglani बिधम/ Dcit, Central Circle-5(4) Room No.1927, 19Th Floor, Uttam House, 69, P „Dmello Vs. Road, Carnac Bunder, Air India Building, Nariman Mumbai-400009. Point, Mumbai-400021. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpm7288D (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Sanjeev Kashyp (Dr) Assessee By: Shri K Shivaram & Rahul Hakani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 30/03/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25/04/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Revenue As Well As Assessee Have Filed The Above Mentioned Appeal As Well As Cross-Objection Against The Order Dated 25.02.2019 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2010-11. C.O. No.20/Mum2021 A.Y.2010-11
For Appellant: Shri K Shivaram & Rahul HakaniFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyp (DR)
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A
…incriminating evidence during search action u/s 153A of the Act. The CIT(A) has relied upon the decision in the case of Pr. CIT Vs. Saumya Construction P. Ltd. (2016) 387 ITR 529, Pr. CIT Vs. Desai 7 C.O. No.20/Mum2021 A.Y.2010-11 Construction P. Ltd. (2016) 387 ITR 552, CIT Vs. Deepak Kumar Agarwal (2017) 86 taxmann.com 3/251, CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla (2016) 386 ITR 483. All the decision speaks about this fact once an assessment has attained finality for a particular year i.e. it is not pending then the same cannot be subject to reopened in proceedings u/s 153A of the Act unless any incriminating material recovered…