PCIT v. SWATI BAJAJ

2022 SCC OnLine CAL 1572Reported decision2022#6310 most cited
19

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. SWATI BAJAJ

MANISH BAID vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 22(4) KOLKATA AND ORS

ITAT/239/2023HC Calcutta13 Dec 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 13Th December, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv ….For Respondent The Court : - We Have Heard Learned Counsel On Either Side. There Is A Delay Of 163 Days In Filing The Appeal. We Are Satisfied With The Explanation Offered By The Petitioner & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned & The Application Ga/1/2023 Is Allowed. The Assessee Has Preferred This Appeal Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Ac 1961 Challenging The Order Dated 10.11.2022 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A Bench, Kolkata (The Tribunal) In Itat No. 530/Kol/2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 & The Order Dated 35 Of 2023 In Ma 7/Kol/2023. The Assessee Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration:

Section 260A

…O 4 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/239/2023 IA NO: GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023 MANISH BAID VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 22(4) KOLKATA AND ORS. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 13th December, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Adv. …for appellant Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv ….for respondent The Court : - We have heard learned Counsel on either side. There is a delay of 163 days in filing the appeal. We are satisfied with the explanation offered by the petitioner and the delay in filing the appea…