N. K. Proteins Ltd. v. DCIT

83 TTJ 904Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2004#6863 most cited
17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2023.

Judgments citing N. K. Proteins Ltd. v. DCIT

I.T.O. - 23(1)(5), MUMBAI vs. GRACE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 712/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shir Pavan Kumar Gadaleito – 23(1)(5) Vs. M/S Grace Development Room.No.113,1St Floor Associates Matru Mandir, 101, B-Wing, Landmark Tardeo Road, Building, 1St Floor, 150 Mumbai – 400 007 Pali Road, Nr. Hdfc Bank, Bandra (W), Mumbai – 400050. Pan/Gir No. : Aahfg5648M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Ms.Neeraja Sarma.Dr Respondent By : Mr.Devendra Jain.Ar Date Of Hearing 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 16.03.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -32, Mumbai Passed U/S 250 Of The Act. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Ms.Neeraja Sarma.DRFor Respondent: Mr.Devendra Jain.AR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 250Section 68

…orting evidence whatsoever is invalid." >ITO VS. Arora Alloys Limited 12 ITR 263 " Addition made of unexplained expenses on sole basis of information received from Central Excise department was held not to be justified." > N. K. Proteins Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2004) 83 TTJ 904 It was held by the Hon'ble Ahmadabad ITAT that - "the entire findings given in the assessment order are based on affidavits and statements obtained by Addl. DIT under Section 131(1A). The AO has simply placed reliance on appraisal report sent by Addl. DIT/Dy. DIT and has reproduced the affidavits/statements of the alleged bogus suppliers. The AO…

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. KARAM CHAND RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6599/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2011-12 Acit, Vs. Karam Chand Rubber Industries Central Circle-7, (P) Ltd., New Delhi. R/O D-1039, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. Pan: Aaack4889J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C. Yadav, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Vijay Verma, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 04.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.12.2018 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30Th September, 2014 Of The Cit(A)-31, New Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing Of Cycle/Rickshaw Rims. A Search U/S 132 Of The It Act Was Carried Out At M/S Dhirani Group Of Cases On 28Th July, 2011 During Which The Business Premises Of The Assessee Was Also Covered. In Response To Notice U/S 153A Of The It Act Dated 21St May, 2012, The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 13Th June, 2012

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Verma, CIT, DR
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 40A(2)(b)

…ly, submitted that merely because the payments have been made through banking channel the same does not establish the genuineness of purchases. 12. Referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of N.K. Proteins Ltd. vs. DCIT, reported in 83 TTJ 904 (Ahmedabad) he submitted that the SLP filed by the assessee was dismissed and the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court was confirmed and the entire undisclosed income generated out of bogus transaction was added to the total income. He also relied on the decision of the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Vijay Proteins Ltd. vs.…