TATA MOTORS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 2(3), MUMBAI
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 631/MUM/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09
Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy& Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.631/मुं/2013 (िन.व. 2008-09) Tata Motors Limited Bombay House, 24,Homi Mody Street, Hutama Chowk, Mumbai – 400001. Pan: Aaact-2727-Q ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle -2(3), Mumbai. Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 020 ....."ितवादी/Respondent अपीलाथ" "ारा/ Appellant By : Shri J.D.Mistry, Sr.Advocate With Shri Nikhil Tiwari,Advocate "ितवादी "ारा/Respondent By : Ms. Vatsala Jha, Cit-Dr & Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Sr.Ar सुनवाई की ितिथ/ Date Of Hearing : 10/11/2023 घोषणा की ितिथ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05/02/2024 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:
For Appellant: Shri J.D.Mistry, Sr.Advocate with Shri Nikhil Tiwari,AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Vatsala Jha, CIT-DR and Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, Sr.AR
Section 116Section 143(3)Section 92C
…TPO for making adjustment, the adjustment is not tenable. To support his submissions he placed reliance on the following decisions: i) Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd, 247 Taxman 136 (Bom) ii) CA Computer Associates Pvt. Ltd., 351 ITR 69 (Bom) (ii) Merck Limited, 179 TTJ 121 (Mum-Trib) affirmed by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Income Tax Appeal No.744 of 2017 decided on 16/09/2019. 45. Per contra, ld. Departmental Representative vehemently supported the order of TPO and the directions of DRP. She referred to the short coming in the valuation report highlighted by the TPO in para 6.6 of the order passed u/s. 92CA(3) of…