Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT

283 ITR 84Supreme Court of India2006#8372 most cited

What is Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT authority for?

Interest on doubtful advances credited to an interest suspense account is taxable under the Income-tax Act.

13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Mercantile Bank Ltd v CIT · section 43C · interest on doubtful advances · interest suspense account · taxable income · UCO Bank case

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Jalna, Income Tax Office vs. The Beed District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Beed

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 802/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.800, 801 & 802/Pun/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, Jalna अपीलार्थी / Appellant The Beed District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Rajuri Ves, Beed – 431122, Vs. Maharashtra Pan : Aaaat5256C Assessee By : Department By : Date Of Hearing : Date Of Pronouncement : Shri Shubham N. Rathi Shri Amol Khairnar 02-12-2024 21-02-2025 प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Per Astha Chandra, Jm : आदेश / Order These Three Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Three Separate Orders All Dated 28.02.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)"] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Department byFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

…artmental authorities in view of the provisions of section 119 to ensure a uniform and proper administration and application of the Income-tax Act." 10. The learned counsel for the respondent has placed reliance in a case of Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 283 ITR 84/153 Taxman 97 (SC), where similar question was raised before the apex court. The question was whether the assessee is liable to be taxed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the interest on doubtful advances credited to the interest suspense account. In this case, UCO Bank's case (supra) was also referred and the hon'ble apex court has al…

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Jalna, Income Tax Office vs. The Beed District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Beed

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 800/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.800, 801 & 802/Pun/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, Jalna Vs. अपीलार्थी / Appellant The Beed District Central Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Rajuri Ves, Beed – 431122, Maharashtra Pan : Aaaat5256C प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Department By : Date Of Hearing : Date Of Pronouncement : Shri Shubham N. Rathi Shri Amol Khairnar 02-12-2024 21-02-2025 Per Astha Chandra, Jm : आदेश / Order These Three Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Three Separate Orders All Dated 28.02.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)"] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Department byFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

…artmental authorities in view of the provisions of section 119 to ensure a uniform and proper administration and application of the Income-tax Act." 10. The learned counsel for the respondent has placed reliance in a case of Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 283 ITR 84/153 Taxman 97 (SC), where similar question was raised before the apex court. The question was whether the assessee is liable to be taxed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the interest on doubtful advances credited to the interest suspense account. In this case, UCO Bank's case (supra) was also referred and the hon'ble apex court has al…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Bank Limited, Visakhapatnam

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the cross objections of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 212/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst.Years :2012-13 & 2013-14) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Income Tax, Urban Bank Ltd. Central Circle-1 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Visakhapatnam Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst. Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bank Ltd. Income Tax, 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Central Circle-1 Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.08.2018

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 16Section 40

…ns of Income- tax Act and as per the circulars issued by CBDT from time to time as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of UCO Bank Vs. CIT 237 ITR 889; State Bank of Travancore Vs. CIT 158 ITR 102 and also in the case of Mercantile Bank Ltd Vs. CIT 283 ITR 84. Reliance in this regard is also placed on the decision or Delhi Special Bench in the case or New India Industries Lt 14 ITA Nos.211 & 212/Viz/2018 and CO Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 The Maharaja Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. Visakhapatnam Vs CLI 18 SOT 51 and jurisdictional Hyderabad Special Bench decision in the case of DCIT Vs. Nagarjuna Investment Tr…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Bank Limited, Visakhapatnam

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the cross objections of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 211/VIZ/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst.Years :2012-13 & 2013-14) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Income Tax, Urban Bank Ltd. Central Circle-1 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Visakhapatnam Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst. Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bank Ltd. Income Tax, 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Central Circle-1 Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.08.2018

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DR
Section 16Section 40

…ns of Income- tax Act and as per the circulars issued by CBDT from time to time as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of UCO Bank Vs. CIT 237 ITR 889; State Bank of Travancore Vs. CIT 158 ITR 102 and also in the case of Mercantile Bank Ltd Vs. CIT 283 ITR 84. Reliance in this regard is also placed on the decision or Delhi Special Bench in the case or New India Industries Lt 14 ITA Nos.211 & 212/Viz/2018 and CO Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 The Maharaja Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. Visakhapatnam Vs CLI 18 SOT 51 and jurisdictional Hyderabad Special Bench decision in the case of DCIT Vs. Nagarjuna Investment Tr…

Mercantile Bank Ltd. v. CIT (283 ITR 84) — Cited in 13 Judgments | BharatTax