M/s Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT

18 Taxmann.com 282Supreme Court of India2012#4694 most cited
25

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing M/s Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT

TMILNAD MERCANTILE BANK LIMITED,TUTICORIN vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, , TIRUNELVELI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 788/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Oct 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.788/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 V. M/S. Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., The Acit, 57 V E Road, Circle-1, Tuticorin Central Bus Stand, Tirunelveli. S.O. Thoothukudi, Tuticorin-628 002. [Pan: Aaact 5558 K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एबी टी. वक", "ाियक सद" एवं एवं एवं एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.788/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2010-11 v. M/s. Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd., The ACIT, 57 V E Road, Circle-1, Tuticorin Central Bus Stand, Tirunelveli. S.O. Thoothukudi, Tuticorin-628 002. [PAN: AAACT 5558 K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से…

TAMILNADU MERCANTILE BANK LTD,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT,C-1,, TUTICORIN

The appeal stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 542/CHNY/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.542/Chny/2021 (िनधा)रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited Dcit बनाम 57, Victoria Extension Road, Circle-1 / Vs. Tuticorin-628 002. Tuticorin. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaact-5558-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri R. Mohan Reddy (Cit)-Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02-08-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08-09-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri R. Mohan Reddy (CIT)-Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा ! एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ%वाल ,लेखा सद( के सम!। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.542/Chny/2021 (िनधा)रण वष) / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited DCIT बनाम 57, Victoria Extension Road, Circle-1 / Vs. Tuticorin-628 002. Tuticorin. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAACT-5558-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld.AR " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent…

THE DHARMAPURI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,DHARMAPURI vs. JCIT, SALEM

The appeal stand partly allowed for statistcial purposes to the extent indicated in the order

ITA 1188/CHNY/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1188/Chny/2016 (िनधा1रण वष1 / Assessment Year: 2008-09) The Dharmapuri District Central Jcit बनाम/ Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Range-Iii No.81/10H, Bye Pass Road, Salem. Vs. Dharmapuri – 636 701 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaaat-3148-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ" की ओरसे/Revenue By : Shri Arv Sreenivasan (Addl.Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 19-04-2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 13-07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl.CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234BSection 36Section 36(1)(viia)

…from the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in Cuddalore District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. V/s DCIT (130 Taxmann.com 239; 14/06/2021). The Hon’ble Court, after considering the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. V/s CIT (18 Taxmann.com 282), held as under: - 19. In the present case, the respondent has stated clearly that the provision for bad and doubtful debts is under section 36 (1) (viia). Unless amount of bad and doubtful debts is debited to the provision for bad and doubtful debts account and the deduction admissible u/s.36 (1) (vii) is limited to the amount by which su…

Showing 120 of 25 · Page 1 of 2