Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala

M/S. R R Industries Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy. Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2741 To 2743/Chny/2025 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Rr Industries Ltd., No.94/95, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. [Pan: Aaacr 3594 H] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement V. The Dcit, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Mr.M.K. Rangaswamy, Ca : Ms.R. Anitha, Addl.Cit : 11.02.2026 : 18.02.2026 आदेश / Order Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (Hereinafter In Short 'The Ld.Cit(A)'), Chennai-18, Dated 07.08.2025, For The Assessment Year (Hereinafter In Short 'Ay') 2008-09 To 2010-11 Confirming The Penalty- Imposed U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act'). :: 2 ::

…issal implies that the Supreme Court has decided not to exercise its discretion to hear the appeal filed before it. For such a proposition, he relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala reported in [2000] 6 SCC 359 (SC), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under: "A petition for leave to appeal to this Court may be dismissed by a non- speaking order or by a speaking order. Whatever be the phraseology employed in the order of dismissal, if it is a non-speaking order, i.e. it does not assign reasons for dismissing the special leave petition, it wo…

M/S. R R Industries Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy. Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2741 To 2743/Chny/2025 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2008-09 To 2010-11 M/S. Rr Industries Ltd., No.94/95, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. [Pan: Aaacr 3594 H] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement V. The Dcit, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Mr.M.K. Rangaswamy, Ca : Ms.R. Anitha, Addl.Cit : 11.02.2026 : 18.02.2026 आदेश / Order Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: These Are Appeals Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (Hereinafter In Short `The Ld.Cit(A)'), Chennai-18, Dated 07.08.2025, For The Assessment Year (Hereinafter In Short `Ay') 2008-09 To 2010-11 Confirming The Penalty- Imposed U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As 'The Act'). :: 2 ::

…issal implies that the Supreme Court has decided not to exercise its discretion to hear the appeal filed before it. For such a proposition, he relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala reported in [2000] 6 SCC 359 (SC), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under: "A petition for leave to appeal to this Court may be dismissed by a non- speaking order or by a speaking order. Whatever be the phraseology employed in the order of dismissal, if it is a non-speaking order, i.e. it does not assign reasons for dismissing the special leave petition, it wo…

M/S. R R Industries Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(4), Chennai

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy. S

…issal implies that the Supreme Court has decided not to exercise its discretion to hear the appeal filed before it. For such a proposition, he relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala reported in [2000] 6 SCC 359 (SC), wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed as under: "A petition for leave to appeal to this Court may be dismissed by a non- speaking order or by a speaking order. Whatever be the phraseology employed in the order of dismissal, if it is a non-speaking order, i.e. it does not assign reasons for dismissing the special leave petition, it…

Sp Chidambaram, Kanchipuram vs. ITO, Ward 1, Kanchipuram

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S. & Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 3934/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Sp Chidambaram 21-A/6, Vallal Pachiyappan Street, Kancheepuram-631501 Tamil Nadu [Pan: Aachc 3681 B] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. The Ito, Ward (1), Kancheepuram, 96, Munuswamy Mudaliar Avenue, Kancheepuram-631501 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By Mr. K. Subash Anbarasu, Adv प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing 28.01.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 29.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 17.12.2025 For Ay 2020-21. 2. At The Outset, We Notice That The Assessee By The Ground No.4 Challenges The Jao Jurisdiction To Issue Notice U/S148 Dated 29.03.2024 Of The Act. :: 2 ::

…e Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (2024) 464 ITR 430 (Bom) is still pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 12. The Supreme Court in a landmark judgement in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala [2000] 113 Taxman 470/245 ITR 360 (SC) has summarised the doctrine of merger as follows:- "Where an appeal or revision is provided before a superior forum against an order passed by a Court, Tribunal or any other authority and such superior forum modifies, reverses or affirms the decision put in issue before it, the decision by the subordinate forum merges with the decision by th…

Ganesan Neelamegam, Kancheepuram vs. ITO, Ward 1 Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 3131/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Ganesan Neelamegam, The Income Tax Officer, No.116/112, North Street, Vs. Ward 1, Ayyampettai S.O, Kancheepuram. Ayyampettai, Kancheepuram – 631 601. Pan: Aeypn 9036M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Ms. Srinithi, Advocate For Shri N.V. Balaji, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28.01.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.01.2026

…Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (2024) 464 ITR 430 (Bom) is still pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 13. The Supreme Court in a landmark judgement in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala [2000] 113 Taxman 470/245 ITR 360 (SC) has summarized the doctrine of merger as follows:- "Where an appeal or revision is provided before a superior forum against an order passed by a Court, Tribunal or any other authority and such superior forum modifies, reverses or affirms the decision put in issue before it, the decision by the subordinate forum merges with the decision by th…

Sun Power Life Battery Centre, Kovilpatti vs. ITO Ward 2, Tuticorin

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No 3390/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Sun Power Life Battery Centre Ito Ward 2 Tuticorin No. 23H-25, Krishnan Kovil St, Kovilpatti-628501 19A Main Building, West Greater Cotton Road, Tuticorin-628001 [Pan: Abnfs 4366 B] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By : Mr. K. Balasubramanian Advocate प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 27.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 14.10.2025 For Ay 2018-19.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNΑΙ सुश्री पद्मावती एस, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No 3390/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 SUN POWER LIFE BATTERY CENTRE ITO WARD 2 TUTICORIN No. 23H-25, Krishnan Kovil St, Kovilpatti-628501 19A MAIN BUILDING, WEST GREATER COTTON ROAD, TUTICORIN-628001 [PAN: ABNFS 4366 B] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee by : Mr. K. Balasubraman…

Shanmugam Chinnia Gounder, Coimbatore vs. ITO Non Corp Ward 1(1), Coimbatore

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No 3366/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shanmugam Chinnia Gounder V. No. 240, Sasthiri Street, Avinashi Road Br Puram, Peelamedu, Coimbatore-641 004 [Pan: Afkpc 1564 Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) Ito Ncw 1(1) Све, Annexe Building, Tamil Nadu (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Mr. Abhishek Murali, C.A. अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By : प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 27.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 28.05.2024 For Ay 2018-19.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNΑΙ सुश्री पद्मावती एस, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No 3366/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 SHANMUGAM CHINNIA GOUNDER v. No. 240, Sasthiri Street, Avinashi Road BR Puram, Peelamedu, Coimbatore-641 004 [PAN: AFKPC 1564 Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) ITO NCW 1(1) СВЕ, Annexe Building, Tamil Nadu (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) MR. Abhishek Murali, C.A. अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee by :…

Dgl Dist Govt Teachers Co-Operative Society Limited, Dindigul vs. The Income Tax Officer, Dindigul

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No 3341/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Dgl Dist Govt Teachers Co- Operative Society Limited 23D, Krishna Road 2Nd Street, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu 624001 [Pan: Aacad0679F] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. Ito Che-W-(501)(91) Chennai (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By : None प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 27.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 18.07.2025 For Ay 2019-20.

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNAI BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No 3341/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2019-20 DGL DIST GOVT TEACHERS CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED 23D, KRISHNA ROAD 2ND STREET, DINDIGUL, TAMIL NADU 624001 [PAN: AACAD0679F] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. ITO CHE-W-(501)(91) CHENNAI (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee by : NONE प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 21.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement :…

Vasu Saravanan, Chennai vs. ITO, Non Corp Ward 1(6), Chennai

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S & Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकर अपील सं./Ita No 3331/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Vasu Saravanan Old No 39, New No. 2, Ramasamy Street, T Nagar, Chennai-600 017 [Pan: Apgps 9284 M] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. Ito, Non Corp Ward 1(6) Chennai, Room No. 412, Main Building Ayakar Bhavan, Nungambakka, Chennai, T.N-600034 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By Mr. Y Sridhar, F.C.A. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 20.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement 27.01.2026 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 19.09.2025 For Ay 2020-21.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNΑΙ सुश्री पद्मावती एस, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No 3331/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2020-21 VASU SARAVANAN OLD NO 39, NEW NO. 2, RAMASAMY STREET, T NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 017 [PAN: APGPS 9284 M] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(6) CHENNAI, ROOM NO. 412, MAIN BUILDING AYAKAR BHAVAN, NUNGAMBAKKA, CHENNAI, T.N-600034 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Asse…

Jaya Chandra Rajan, Tirunelveli vs. ITO, Ward 1 Tirunelvel, Tirunelvel

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNΑΙ सुश्री पद्मावती एस, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं BEFORE MS. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No 3329/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2015-16 JAYA CHANDRA RAJAN 2/55A RAJAKRISHNAPURAM RAJAKRISHNAPURAM В.О., TIRUNELVELI, TAMIL NADU-627 114 (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) ITO, WARD 1, TIRUNELVEL, WARD 1, TIRUNELVEL, NELLAI, CITY, TIRUCHENDHUR ROAD RAMNATH NAGAR, TIRUNELVELI, T TAMIL NADU-627011 (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Ms. SANCHITA.…

Jayasankar Natarajan, Chennai vs. ITO, Ncw-1(2), Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Ms Padmavathy Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 3211/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18

…Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (2024) 464 ITR 430 (Bom) is still pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 13. The Supreme Court in a landmark judgement in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala [2000] 113 Taxman 470/245 ITR 360 (SC) has summarized the doctrine of merger as follows:- "Where an appeal or revision is provided before a superior forum against an order passed by a Court, Tribunal or any other authority and such superior forum modifies, reverses or affirms the decision put in issue before it, the decision by the subordinate forum merges with the decision by th…

Ganesh Chand Suresh Kumar, Chennai vs. ITO, Ncw-3(3), Chennai

Bench: Shri George George Kand Ms Padmavathy Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 3143/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Shri Ganesh Chand Suresh Kumar, A-2, 1St Floor, Ashok Ganapathim, New No.49, 4Th Main Road, R.A. Puram, Chennai - 600 028. Pan: Brtps 0536A (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/Appellant By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से/Respondent By The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 3(3), Chennai (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate : Ms. R. Kavitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 22.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.01.2026 आदेश/ Order Per George George K: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Dated 18.09.2025, Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called `The Act'). The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2017-18. :-2 -:

…e Bombay High Court in Hexaware Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (2024) 464 ITR 430 (Bom) is still pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 13. The Supreme Court in a landmark judgement in the case of Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala [2000] 113 Taxman 470/245 ITR 360 (SC) has summarized the doctrine of merger as follows:- "Where an appeal or revision is provided before a superior forum against an order passed by a Court, Tribunal or any other authority and such superior forum modifies, reverses or affirms the decision put in issue before it, the decision by the subordinate forum merges with the decision by th…