Krishi Tyre Retreading 360 ITR 580, CIT v. Mahendra Singh Khedia

252 CTR 453High Court2012#6931 most cited

What is Krishi Tyre Retreading 360 ITR 580, CIT v. Mahendra Singh Khedia authority for?

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be levied on additions made purely on estimation basis.

16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Mahendra Singh Khedia · 271(1)(c) · penalty · estimation · additions on estimation · additions on estimate basis · penalty not leviable on estimation · penalty on estimated additions

Judgments citing Krishi Tyre Retreading 360 ITR 580, CIT v. Mahendra Singh Khedia

Mahendra J. Shah (HUF), Mumbai vs. ITO WD 16(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby ordered to be allowed

ITA 1727/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Jul 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Rajendra, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1727/Mum/2014 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Mahendra J. Shah (Huf) 9, बिधम/ Ito, Ward-16(3)(1), Ground Floor, Mangesh Mumbai. Vs. Building, Avantikabai Gokhale Road, Opera House, Mumbai-400004. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aachm6978D (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Abhishek Jhunjhunwala(Ar) Revenue By: Shri Suman Kumar (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 02.04.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 02.07.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Present Appeal Against The Order Dated 25.07.2013 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, Mumbai [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”] Relevant To The A.Y.2005- 06. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: - “1. The Appellant Prefers An Appeal Against An Order Dated 25/07/2013 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax Officer (Appeal) 28, Mumbai On Following Amongst Other Grounds Each Of Which Are Without Prejudice To Any Other: -

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek Jhunjhunwala(AR)For Respondent: Shri Suman Kumar (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 271Section 68

…e. In support of these contention the Ld. Representative of the assessee has relied upon the law settled in Murarilal Ratanlal Agarwal Vs. ACIT IT (SS) A. No. 573 & 615/Ahd)2012, Ojas Ashokbhai Vs. ITO ITA. No.296 & 297/Ahd/2013, CIT Vs. Mahendra Singh Khedla 252 CTR 453 (Raj-High Court), CIT Vs. Krishi Tyre Retrading & Rubber Industries 360 ITR 580 (Raj-High Court) & CIT Vs. Ravail Singh & Co. 254 ITR 191 (P&H-High Court). However, on the other hand, the Ld. Representative of the Department has strongly relied upon the order passed by the CIT(A) in question. Copy of bank statement of (HUF) on record which lies a…

Krishi Tyre Retreading 360 ITR 580, CIT v. Mahendra Singh Khedia (252 CTR 453) — Cited in 16 Judgments | BharatTax