Kim Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

216 Taxmann 153High Court2013#5822 most cited
20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kim Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT

SH. AMBRISH SHARMA PROP. M/S PUNJAB HANDLOOM,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-2, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 461/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 461/Chd/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Shri Ambrish Sharma, Prop. M/s Punjab Handloom, Near Petrol Pump, Link Road, Ludhiana-141003, Punjab बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-2, Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AYVPS7324Q अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR स

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 68Section 69ASection 69B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"" एवं "ी कृणव" सहाय, लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV, VP & SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 461/Chd/ 2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Shri Ambrish Sharma, बनाम The DCIT Prop. M/s Punjab Handloom, Central Circle-2, Near Petrol Pump, Link Road, Ludhiana Ludhiana-141003, Punjab "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AYVPS7324Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज" की ओर से/ Rev…

ANIL KUMAR PROP. MS KK AGRO INDUSTRIES LOHA BAZAR, AHMEDGARH ,PUNJAB vs. JATIN ABBI THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, LUDHIANA, PUNJAB

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 752/CHANDI/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Jan 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 752/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Anil Kumar Prop. The Dcit, M/S K K Agro Industries, बनाम Central Circle-3, Loha Bazar, Ludhiana Vs. Ahmedgarh

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 69

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ, च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘A’, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 752/CHD/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Anil Kumar Prop. The DCIT, M/s K K Agro Industries, बनाम Central Circle-3, Loha Bazar, Ludhiana Vs. Ahmedgarh, "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ACJPK8675Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent ( Physical Hearing ) "नधा""रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr. DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Da…

SANJEEV KUMAR GOYAL,FATEHABAD vs. DCIT, CC-2, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 80/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh22 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: This Hon’Ble Tribunal Under Section 253 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 As Amended From Time To Time. 2. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dt. 20/01/2023 In Appeal No. 10853/2018-19/It/Cit(A)-5/Ldh/2021-22 For The A.Y. 2019-20 Under Section 250(6) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Which Was Dismissed. Therefore The Present Second Appeal Under Section 253 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Before Us Against The Aforesaid Order Dt. 20/01/2023 Which Is Hereinafter Referred To As The Impugned Order.

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Rishaba Marwaha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Dharamvir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 250(6)Section 253Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी िव"म िसंह यादव, लेखा सद" एवं "ी परेश म. जोशी, "ाियक सद" BEFORE: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM & SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 80/Chd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Shri Sanjeev Kumar Goyal बनाम The DCIT Usha Garg Complex, Anaj Mandi, Central Circle-2, Fatehabad-125050 (Haryana) Ludhiana "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: ACTPK9201E अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Rishaba Marwah…

M/S A.P. KNIT FAB,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT CC-3, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 732/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Have Not Been Appreciated. 4. That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Failed To Appreciate That During The Course Of Survey, No Other Income Was Noticed By The Department And, As Such, Taxing The Amount Offered As Deemed Income, Is Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 5. That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Also Failed To Appreciate That At The Time Of Survey, It Was Agreed That The Applicant Shall Pay The Taxes On The Amount Offered

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69Section 69B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी संजय गग", "याियक सद"य एवं "ी िव"म "सह यादव, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. SANJAY GARG, JM & SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 732/Chd/ 2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/s A P Knit Fab बनाम The DCIT Bawa Colony, Bahadur Ke Road, Central Circle-3 Ludhiana Ludhiana "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAUFA3235B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Amanpreet Kaur,…

VASANTRAO JAYAVANTRAO MUGALE,OSMANABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 95/PUN/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.95/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Vasantrao Jayavantrao Vs. Dcit, Circle-1, Mugale, Aurangabad. 1 Mugle Hospital, Highway Road Omerga Osmanabad- 413606. Pan : Aavpm0306N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Bhupendra Shah Revenue By Shri M. G. Jasnani : Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.07.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Pune [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 14.12.2022 For The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is An Individual Engaged In The Business Of Medical Profession Under The Name & Style Of “M/S. Mugale Hospital”. The Appellant Had Filed

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Shah
Section 115BSection 133A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.95/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Vasantrao Jayavantrao Vs. DCIT, Circle-1, Mugale, Aurangabad. 1 Mugle Hospital, Highway Road Omerga Osmanabad- 413606. PAN : AAVPM0306N Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Bhupendra Shah Revenue by Shri M. G. Jasnani : Date of hearing : 26.06.2023 Date of pronouncement : 12.07.2023 आदेश / ORDER PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the or…