M/S JASHAN FINLEASE LTD.,KHANNA vs. DCIT, CC-1, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the surrendered amount, though unrecorded at the time of survey, was directly related to the assessee's regular finance business. Therefore, it could not be taxed under the deeming provisions of Section 69 and Section 115BBE.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee, engaged in hire purchase/finance, surrendered Rs. 75,00,000/- on account of unrecorded receivables. The assessee subsequently offered this amount as business income in its return.
What were the issues?
Whether unrecorded receivables surrendered during a survey, which are linked to the assessee's regular business, can be taxed under Section 69 and Section 115BBE.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT136 citing247 ITR 290 · 2001 · HC · Read judgment
- Chokshi Hiralal Maganlal v. DCIT54 citing131 TTJ 1 · 2010 · ITAT
- Kim Pharma (P) Ltd. v. CIT47 citing216 Taxmann 153 · 2013 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Deccan Jewellers Ltd.34 citing438 ITR 131 · 2021 · HC
- Famina Knit Fabs v. ACIT33 citing176 ITD 246 · 2019 · ITAT
- 110 Taxmann.com 213\n• Chokshi Hiralal Maganlal Vs. DCIT, 46 SOT 349\n• M/s. Bajaj Sons Ltd. v. DCIT11 citing82 Taxmann.com 337 · 2017
- Gaurish Steels P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT10 citing43 ITR 414
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेश/Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) - 5, Ludhiana dt. 01/03/2023 pertaining to Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. In the present appeal, the Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of the Ld. AO in holding that the provision of Section 69 r.w.s. 115BBE would be applicable on the amount surrendered during survey on
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026