Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi

4 SCC 307Supreme Court of India2012#1021 most cited

What is Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi authority for?

Conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function that cannot be granted by consent or by a superior court. Any order or decree passed without jurisdiction is a nullity, rendering it void, and this issue can be raised at any stage of the proceedings, including in appeal or execution.

106

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2013 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi · jurisdiction · legislative function · order without jurisdiction · nullity · void ab initio · procedural defect · objection at any stage · Section 153A · Section 143(3) · Document Identification Number · DIN

Also reported as

2015 SCC OnLine BOM 1686

Sections most often in play

Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 153CSection 132Section 143(3)Section 143(2)Section 142(1)

Issues it is cited on

section 144(b)section 115whsection 124(3)(a)section 115wfsection 115wdsection 115wesection 153cofsection 127(2)(a)section 124(3)section 11bsection 144(3)section 153aof

Judgments citing Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6203/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6202/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6201/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6200/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6199/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6198/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2012-13
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

KASHYAP KANIYALAL MEHTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-4(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 6197/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Mar 2026AY 2011-12
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘E’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.6197/Mum/2024 to 6203/Mum/2024 (Assessment Years :2011-12 & 2012-13; 2014-15 to 2018- 19) Kashyap Kanaiyalal Vs. DCIT CC 4(1), Mumbai Mehta 26/27, A Wing Ahuja Towers Rajabhau Desai Road Prabhadevi road Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAFPM4290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal CA (virtually appeared) a/w. Satish Kumar Revenue by Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR Date of Hearing 17/02/2026 Date of Pronouncement 27/03/2026 आदेश / O R D E…

WHITE ORCHID HOSPITALITY (P) LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5130/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Smt. Renu Jauhriassessment Year : 2021-22 White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd., Vs. Dcit, 306, Suneja Tower Ii, Central Circle-29, Distt. Centre, Janakpuri, Delhi. Desu Colony So, West Delhi, New Delhi– 110 058. Pan: Aaccw1923F

For Appellant: Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, CAFor Respondent: Ms Amisha S. Gupt, CIT- DR
Section 132Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 250Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : E : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT. RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2021-22 White Orchid Hospitality (P) Ltd., Vs. DCIT, 306, Suneja Tower II, Central Circle-29, Distt. Centre, Janakpuri, Delhi. DESU Colony SO, West Delhi, New Delhi– 110 058. PAN: AACCW1923F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vinod Kumar Bindal, CA; Ms Rinky Sharma, ITP & Shri Anmol Jha, Advocate Revenue by : Ms Amisha S. Gupt, CIT- DR Date of Hearing : 17.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 09.01.2026 ORDER PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM: The appeal…

RAGHU ALEKH BARLI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly we have set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and quashed the impugned assessment order. Following the same reasoning, all these three appeals filed by the assessee are also allowed in ...

ITA 915/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaappeal In Ita Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) Pan:Amnpl4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. Cit 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) Pan:Ahjpa1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. Cit 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) Pan:Aaacu2692R Hyderabad 1606/Hyd/2025 Shri Bikaram Income Tax Officer 2018-19 Pushpender, Hyderabad Ward 9(1) Pan: Cebpp4471F Hyderabad िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao & Sashank Dundu & C.A. Kumar Pal Tated राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Waseem Ur Rahman, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao &For Respondent: : Shri Waseem UR Rahman, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148A

…ITA Nos 1317 915 1487 and 1606 आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रिवश सूद,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद" सम" | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member Appeal in ITA Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) PAN:AMNPL4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. CIT 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) PAN:AHJPA1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. CIT 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) PAN:AAACU…

BIKARAM PUSHPENDER,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly we have set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and quashed the impugned assessment order. Following the same reasoning, all these three appeals filed by the assessee are also allowed in ...

ITA 1606/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaappeal In Ita Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) Pan:Amnpl4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. Cit 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) Pan:Ahjpa1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. Cit 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) Pan:Aaacu2692R Hyderabad 1606/Hyd/2025 Shri Bikaram Income Tax Officer 2018-19 Pushpender, Hyderabad Ward 9(1) Pan: Cebpp4471F Hyderabad िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao & Sashank Dundu & C.A. Kumar Pal Tated राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Waseem Ur Rahman, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao &For Respondent: : Shri Waseem UR Rahman, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148A

…ITA Nos 1317 915 1487 and 1606 आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रिवश सूद,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद" सम" | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member Appeal in ITA Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) PAN:AMNPL4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. CIT 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) PAN:AHJPA1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. CIT 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) PAN:AAACU…

PRABHAKAR REDDY BASIREDDY, NALGONDA vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1) , HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 1592/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 132Section 147Section 148

…tion on an Officer who is acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

PRABHAKAR REDDY BASIREDDY, NALGONDA vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 1591/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 147Section 148

…tion on an Officer who is acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

SANZYME PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly we have set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and quashed the impugned assessment order. Following the same reasoning, all these three appeals filed by the assessee are also allowed in ...

ITA 1487/HYD/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaappeal In Ita Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) Pan:Amnpl4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. Cit 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) Pan:Ahjpa1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. Cit 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) Pan:Aaacu2692R Hyderabad 1606/Hyd/2025 Shri Bikaram Income Tax Officer 2018-19 Pushpender, Hyderabad Ward 9(1) Pan: Cebpp4471F Hyderabad िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao & Sashank Dundu & C.A. Kumar Pal Tated राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Waseem Ur Rahman, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao &For Respondent: : Shri Waseem UR Rahman, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148A

…ITA Nos 1317 915 1487 and 1606 आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रिवश सूद,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद" सम" | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member Appeal in ITA Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) PAN:AMNPL4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. CIT 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) PAN:AHJPA1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. CIT 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) PAN:AAACU…

VIJAY KUMAR PATIL,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our above observation

ITA 1328/HYD/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1328/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Vijay Kumar Patil Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward 7(1) Pan:Aqopp2830M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Sarang Shah राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 24/12/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: CA Sarang ShahFor Respondent: : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 124Section 124(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151A(1)

…ITA No 1328 of 2025 Vijay Kumar Patil आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रिवश सूद,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद" सम" | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1328/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Vijay Kumar Patil Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward 7(1) PAN:AQOPP2830M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: CA Sarang Shah राज" व "ारा/Revenue by:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 16/12/2025…

LINGAMGUNTA ADILAXMI,SECUNDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly we have set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and quashed the impugned assessment order. Following the same reasoning, all these three appeals filed by the assessee are also allowed in ...

ITA 1317/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaappeal In Ita Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) Pan:Amnpl4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. Cit 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) Pan:Ahjpa1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. Cit 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) Pan:Aaacu2692R Hyderabad 1606/Hyd/2025 Shri Bikaram Income Tax Officer 2018-19 Pushpender, Hyderabad Ward 9(1) Pan: Cebpp4471F Hyderabad िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao & Sashank Dundu & C.A. Kumar Pal Tated राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Waseem Ur Rahman, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Advocates Shri S. Rama Rao &For Respondent: : Shri Waseem UR Rahman, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148A

…ITA Nos 1317 915 1487 and 1606 आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी रिवश सूद,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साविड़या लेखा सद" सम" | Before Shri Ravish Sood, Judicial Member A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member Appeal in ITA Assessee Revenue A.Y 1317/Hyd/2025 Smt. Lingamgunta Income Tax Officer 2015-16 Adilaxmi, Secunderabad Ward 10 (1) PAN:AMNPL4940M Hyderabad 915/Hyd/2025 Shri Raghu Alekh Barli Dy. CIT 2018-19 Hyderabad Circle 6(1) PAN:AHJPA1085F Hyderabad 1487/Hyd/2025 Sanzyme Private Ltd Dy. CIT 2019-20 Hyderabad Circle 3(1) PAN:AAACU…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1145/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…s acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Society Limited VS. ITO Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1144/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…s acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Society Limited VS. ITO Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

THE OOKAL FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,WARANGAL vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

In the result, all three appeals of the assesssee, i

ITA 1143/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

…s acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Society Limited VS. ITO Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

VIKRAM BRAHMENDRA SATYAJIT MULPURI,KRISHNA DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 534/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.534/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21) Vikram Brahmendra Satyajit Vs. Income Tax Officer, Mulpuri, Ward-3(1), Krishna District. Vijayawada. Pan: Aonpm1893G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 02/12/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 19/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 69A

…tion on an Officer who is acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment 12 Vikram Brahmendra Satyajit Mulpuri vs. ITO of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the cou…

KRISHNAVENI KOKKULA,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 558/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us:

Section 147Section 69A

…tion on an Officer who is acting under the Act when he does not have jurisdiction. The Hon'ble High Court, while concluding as hereinabove, had relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (2012) 4 SCC 307. The Hon'ble Apex Court in its aforesaid judgment, had held that it is the settled legal proposition that conferment of jurisdiction is a legislative function and it can neither be conferred with the consent of the parties nor by a superior court. The Hon'ble Apex Court further observed that if the court passes an order or decree having no jurisdic…

Showing 1–20 of 106 · Page 1 of 6

Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi (4 SCC 307) — Cited in 106 Judgments | BharatTax