ITO v. Zazsons Exports Ltd.

158 ITD 1Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2016#10238 most cited
11

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2024.

Also reported as

55 Taxmann.com 522

Judgments citing ITO v. Zazsons Exports Ltd.

AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDI. NATIOANL E- ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 804/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadassessment Year: 2016-17 Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Vs Addl. National E-Assessment 1St Floor, Elegance Tower, Centre, Plot No.8, Non Heirarchial New Delhi. Commercial Centre, Jasola Vihar, New Delhi – 110 025. Pan: Aaaca5603Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sudesh Kumar Garg, Advocate Ms Bhavya Garg, Ca & Shri Prince Bansal, Ca Revenue By : Shri Surender Pal, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 08.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 30.03.2022 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30Th April, 2021 Passed By The Ao U/S 143(3)/144C(13) R.W.S. 144B Of The It Act, 1961 For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Amway Corporation Engaged In The Business Of Direct Selling Of Consumer Products. It Sells Its Products Through Multi-Level Marketing (Mlm). Mlm Marketing Allows Direct Sellers To Build A Business Through Their Own Sales Efforts & Inviting Others To Become Direct Sellers. The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income On 30.11.2016 Declaring A Loss Of Rs.113,69,23,009/-. Since The Assessee Had Entered Into Certain International Transactions With Its Ae, The Ao Referred The Matter To The Tpo For Determination Of The Alp Of The International Transaction Entered Into By It.

For Appellant: Shri Sudesh Kumar Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : I-1 : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Vs Addl. National E-Assessment 1st Floor, Elegance Tower, Centre, Plot No.8, Non Heirarchial New Delhi. Commercial Centre, Jasola Vihar, New Delhi – 110 025. PAN: AAACA5603Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Sudesh Kumar Garg, Advocate Ms Bhavya Garg, CA & Shri Prince Bansal, CA Revenue by : Shri Surender Pal, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 08.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30.03.2022 ORDER…

MOHD YUNUS QURESHI,HAPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, HAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4936/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2008-09 Mohd Yunus Qureshi, Vs. Ito, C/O Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate, Ward-1, Chamber No.206-207, Hapur. Ansal “Satyam”, Rdc Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad (Up). Pan: Abppy3882L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.08.2019 Order This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 30Th December, 2013 Of The Cit(A), Muzaffarnagar, Relating To Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Ground Of Appeal No.1 Being General In Nature Is Dismissed.

For Appellant: Shri Akhilesh Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 68

…editors towards purchases since the said purchases were duly recorded in books of account and sales made against those purchases were not disputed. Referring to the decision of the Lucknow 4 Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Zazsons Exports Ltd., 158 ITD 1, he submitted that the Tribunal in the said decision has held that where the Assessing Officer had drawn an adverse conclusion only on account of non-verifiability of sundry creditors but there being no dispute as regards purchases, and trading results having been accepted, addition made under section 68 was not sustainable. Referring to the de…

M/S. SPORTS INFRATECH PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2045/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. K. N. Chary, Jm Ita No. 2045/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 M/S Sports Infratech Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, 204, Okhla Industrial Estate, Central Circle-5, Phase-Iii, New Delhi-110020 New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcj7255J Assessee By : Sh. Sanjay Jain, Ca & Sh. Rakesh Joshi, Ca Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.04.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 13.06.2018 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 30.01.2015 Of Ld. Cit(A)-24, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjay Jain, CA &For Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 37

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM and Sh. K. N. Chary, JM ITA No. 2045/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 M/s Sports Infratech Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, 204, Okhla Industrial Estate, Central Circle-5, Phase-III, New Delhi-110020 New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AABCJ7255J Assessee by : Sh. Sanjay Jain, CA & Sh. Rakesh Joshi, CA Revenue by : Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 05.04.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 13.06.2018 ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM: This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 30.01.2015 of l…

DCIT CEN CIR 20, MUMBAI vs. PURNANDU JAIN (HUF), MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 927/MUM/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jan 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 926 & 927/Bang/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S. Shell India Markets Private Ito (International Taxations), Limited Ward 2(1), Bangalore बनाम/ Trent House, First Floor, G Block, (Now Transferred To Ito (Tds)- Vs. Plot No. C-60, Bandra Kurla Complex, Ltu, Mumbai)) Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.Aaics1404 P (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Madhur Agarwal & Shri Dinesh Patil ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri M. V. Rajguru

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal &For Respondent: Shri M. V. Rajguru
Section 14Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

…tworks QY (358 ITR 259) (Del He) (c) DIT vs Ericsson A. B. (343 ITR 470) (Del He) (d) CIT vs Halliburton Export Inc (ITA No 363 of 2016) (Del He) (e) DDIT vs Reliance Industries Ltd (159 ITO 208) (Mum ITAT) (f) Capgimini Business Services (India) Ltd Vs ACIT (158 ITD 1) (MUM ITAT) (g) ADIT vs. Baan Global BV (ITA No 7048/Mum/2010) (Mum ITAT) (h) Galatea Limited vs CIT (157 ITD 938) (Mum ITAT) M/s. Shell India Markets Private Limited (i) ADIT (IT) vs First Advantage (P) Ltd (77 taxmann.com 195) (Mum ITAT) 9. Per contra Ld. DR submitted that though the Hon’ble Delhi Court has decided the similar issue in favour of…