Indu Lata Rangwala v. DCIT

80 Taxmann.com 102High Court2017#5118 most cited

What is Indu Lata Rangwala v. DCIT authority for?

Where an initial assessment is processed under section 143(1), the Assessing Officer is not required to find fresh tangible material to form a belief that income has escaped assessment for the purpose of reopening.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Indu Lata Rangwala · DCIT · 143(1) · 147 · reasons to believe · fresh tangible material · escaped assessment · reopening assessment

Also reported as

286 CTR 474

Sections most often in play

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 144B

Issues it is cited on

section 54(1)section 147(b)fresh tangible materialsection 54esection 55asection 54ecwithin four yearssection 13(2)long-term capital assetsection 53asection 53first proviso to section 147

Judgments citing Indu Lata Rangwala v. DCIT

Vinita Bajoria, Jaipur vs. Income-Tax Officer, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 370/JPR/2025[201617]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 370/JP/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Vinita Bajoria 1, Ganesh Colony Moti Doongri Road, Jaipur बनाम Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2), Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AEBPB4873M अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by: Sh. Manoj Choudhary, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Sh. Gorav Avasthi, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hear

For Appellant: Sh. Manoj Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Gorav Avasthi, JCIT
Section 147Section 148Section 148A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 370/JP/2025 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2016-17 cuke Vinita Bajoria Income Tax Officer, Vs. 1, Ganesh Colony Moti Doongri Ward 5(2), Road, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AEBPB4873M vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Manoj Choudhary, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue b…

Smt. Lakshmi Agarwal, Jaipur vs. ITO, Ward-4(5), Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed with no orders as to costs

ITA 286/JPR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: recording satisfaction for issuance of notice since the information is specific. Thus the reasons recorded for re-opening is on borrowed satisfaction and not on any satisfaction by the AO. The

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

…ng jurisdiction u/s.147 as no return of income has been filed by the appellant u/s. 139(1) of the Act or in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act. This view has also been held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Indu Lata Rangwala Vs DCIT (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi) wherein it was held "Whereas in a case where the initial assessment order is under section 143(3), and sought to be reopened within four years from the expiry of the relevant assessment year, the Assessing Officer has to base his reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment on some fresh tangible material that provides the…

Khangaram K Dewasi, Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-2(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal

ITA 2807/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mr. Khangaram K. Dewasi, Prop. The Dcit, Central Circle-2(3), Of Shreenathji Metal & Alloys, Mumbai-21 Shop No. 5, Sultan Market, Opp. Vs. Ash Krishna Bldg. Andheri Ghatkoper Road, Sakinaka, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400072. Pan No. Aeepd 8897 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

…beneficiary of accommodation entries by was beneficiary of accommodation entries by way of share application provided by a third party, way of share application provided by a third party, same was justified. same was justified. 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 384 ITR 337 Del High 384 ITR 337 Del High Court- where initial return of income is where initial return of income is processed u/s 143(1), it is not necessary in such a case for AO to come processed u/…

Khangaram K. Dewasi, Mumbai vs. DCIT- CC-2(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal

ITA 2806/MUM/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mr. Khangaram K. Dewasi, Prop. The Dcit, Central Circle-2(3), Of Shreenathji Metal & Alloys, Mumbai-21 Shop No. 5, Sultan Market, Opp. Vs. Ash Krishna Bldg. Andheri Ghatkoper Road, Sakinaka, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400072. Pan No. Aeepd 8897 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

…beneficiary of accommodation entries by was beneficiary of accommodation entries by way of share application provided by a third party, way of share application provided by a third party, same was justified. same was justified. 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 384 ITR 337 Del High 384 ITR 337 Del High Court- where initial return of income is where initial return of income is processed u/s 143(1), it is not necessary in such a case for AO to come processed u/…

Khangaram K. Dewasi, Mumbai vs. DCIT, CC-2(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal

ITA 2805/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mr. Khangaram K. Dewasi, Prop. The Dcit, Central Circle-2(3), Of Shreenathji Metal & Alloys, Mumbai-21 Shop No. 5, Sultan Market, Opp. Vs. Ash Krishna Bldg. Andheri Ghatkoper Road, Sakinaka, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400072. Pan No. Aeepd 8897 C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Ajeya Kumar Ojha, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

…beneficiary of accommodation entries by was beneficiary of accommodation entries by way of share application provided by a third party, way of share application provided by a third party, same was justified. same was justified. 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 5. Indu Lata Rangwala vs DCIT 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi)[2016] 384 ITR 337 Del High 384 ITR 337 Del High Court- where initial return of income is where initial return of income is processed u/s 143(1), it is not necessary in such a case for AO to come processed u/…

J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad vs. ACIT, Faridabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1061/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 148(2)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.1060 & 1061/DEL/2015 Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2009-10 J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., v. ACIT, B-17, First Floor, Circle-II, Nehru Ground, NIT, Faridabad. Faridabad. TAN/PAN: AAACJ9814A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Rajesh Jain, CA Respondent by: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 05 07 2021 Date of pronouncement: 31 08 2021 O R D E R PER, AMIT SHUKLA, J.M. The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate impugned ord…

Sh. Valmik Thapar, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

Appeals are disposed of by this common order as indicated above

ITA 5767/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Hon’Ble Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Acit, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Dcit, M/S. R. N. Khanna & Company, Ca, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Agarwal, Senior Advocate Along With Shri Shailesh Gupta, Shri Mahur Agarwal, Advocates Revenue By: Shri H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11/06/2021 (Last Hearing) Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2021. O R D E R Per Prashant Maharishi, A. M. 1. These Are Three Appeals For Two Assessment Years Pertaining To One Assessee, Mr. Valmik Thapar, A Resident, Individual [Assessee]. Assessee Filed Ita Number

For Appellant: Shri Salil AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143Section 147Section 54Section 54E

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. ACIT, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. DCIT, M/s. R. N. Khanna & Company, CA, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Salil Agarwal,…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. Sh. Valmik Thapar, New Delhi

Appeals are disposed of by this common order as indicated above

ITA 6726/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Acit, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Dcit, M/S. R. N. Khanna & Company, Ca, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Agarwal, Senior Advocate Along With Shri Shailesh Gupta, Shri Mahur Agarwal, Advocates Revenue By: Shri H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11/06/2021 (Last Hearing) Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2021. O R D E R Per Prashant Maharishi, A. M. 1. These Are Three Appeals For Two Assessment Years Pertaining To One Assessee, Mr. Valmik Thapar, A Resident, Individual [Assessee]. Assessee Filed Ita Number

For Appellant: Shri Salil AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143Section 147Section 54Section 54E

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. ACIT, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. DCIT, M/s. R. N. Khanna & Company, CA, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Salil Agarwal,…

Shri Valmik Thapar, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

Appeals are disposed of by this common order as indicated above

ITA 6346/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Prashant Maharishi(Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Acit, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. Dcit, M/S. R. N. Khanna & Company, Ca, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aacpt7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Agarwal, Senior Advocate Along With Shri Shailesh Gupta, Shri Mahur Agarwal, Advocates Revenue By: Shri H. K. Choudhary, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11/06/2021 (Last Hearing) Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2021. O R D E R Per Prashant Maharishi, A. M. 1. These Are Three Appeals For Two Assessment Years Pertaining To One Assessee, Mr. Valmik Thapar, A Resident, Individual [Assessee]. Assessee Filed Ita Number

For Appellant: Shri Salil AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri H. K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 143Section 147Section 54Section 54E

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE HON’BLE JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, PRESIDENT AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Through Video Conferencing) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. ACIT, 19, Kautilya Marg, Circle-53(1), New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Valmik Thapar, Vs. DCIT, M/s. R. N. Khanna & Company, CA, Circle-32(1), 14-15F, Shivam House, Connaught New Delhi Place, New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT, Vs. Shri Valmik Thapar, Circle-53(1), 19, Kautilya Marg, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AACPT7098K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Salil Agarwal,…

Sunil Kanayalal Gambani, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 2, Kalyan

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1179/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Mr. M. Subramanian, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Chaudhary Arun Kumar Singh, DR
Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “G” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Sunil KanayalalGambani, ACIT, Circle-2, Kalyan, I.T. Office, 608, Powai Plaza, Mohan Plaza (2nd floor) Wayale Vs. Hiranandani Garden, Nagar, Kalyan (West)- 421301 Mumbai-400076. PAN No. AAZPG6798E Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Mr. M. Subramanian, AR Revenue by : Mr. Chaudhary Arun Kumar Singh, DR Date of Hearing : 29/07/2019 Date of pronouncement : 31/07/2019 ORDER PER N.K. PRADHAN, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee. The rel…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. M/S. Senorita Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5388/DEL/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Jul 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Yogesh Jagia, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR
Section 131(1)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151(2)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 5388/DEL/2015 A.Y. : 2007-08 DCIT, CIRCLE 23(2), VS. SENORITA ENTERPRISES PVT. NEW DELHI LTD., ROOM NO. 248, C.R. V-6/1, FIRST FLOOR, BUILDING, GREEN PARK EXTEN., I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI – 110016 NEW DELHI – 11 0002 (PAN : AAJCS7373P) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT) Revenue by : Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR. Assessee by : Sh. Yogesh Jagia, Adv. ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU : JM The Revenue has filed this Appeal against the impugned Order dated 10.6.2015 of the Ld. CIT(A)-8, New…

The Gita Education Society, Delhi vs. ITO, Exemption Ward, Ghaziabad

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 7441/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Agrawal & Hon’Ble Smt. Suchitra Kamblethe Gita Education Vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Society, C/O Kapil Goel Ward, Ghaziabad Adv F-26/124 Sector 7 Rohini, Delhi-110085 Pan-Aaaat9753G (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35

…DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SMT. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER The Gita Education Vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Society, C/o Kapil Goel Ward, Ghaziabad Adv F-26/124 Sector 7 Rohini, Delhi-110085 PAN-AAAAT9753G (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Kapil Goel, CA Respondent by Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT DR Date of Hearing 07.05.2019 Date of Pronouncement 22.05.2019 ORDER PER G.D. AGRAWAL, V.P. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.09.2018 passed by the CIT(A, Ghaziabad. In this appeal filed by the assessee, Ground No. 1…

Lexplosion Solution Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 15(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 7762/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. R.K Pandaassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. Shishya Edutech (P) Ltd. Ito 4346/4-C, 1St Floor, Ansari Vs Ward – 23(2) Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi -02 C/O Shri S. K. Sahpathi House No.579, Sector -16A, Faridabad -121002 Pan No. Aahcs9225R (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. R.K PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s. Shishya Edutech (P) Ltd. ITO 4346/4-C, 1st Floor, Ansari Vs Ward – 23(2) Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi -02 C/o Shri S. K. Sahpathi House No.579, Sector -16A, Faridabad -121002 PAN No. AAHCS9225R (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. P. C. Yadav, Advocate Respondent by Sh. S. L. Anuragi, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 20/02/2019 Date of Pronouncement: 01/04/2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the 1. order dated 16.10.20…

Indian Road Congress, New Delhi vs. ADIT (E), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 775/DEL/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri T. S. Kapoor & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year:2008-09

Section 10Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

…Hon'ble Court has held that reopening of case u/s 147(b) on the basis of factual information given by internal audit party was valid in law. Reliance was further placed on an order of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Indu Lata Rangwala vs. DCIT [2017] 80 Taxmann.com 102 (Delhi) for the proposition that it is not necessary for Assessing Officer to come across some fresh tangible material to form ‘reasons to believe’ that income has escaped assessment. 3.1 Arguing second ground Learned D.R. stated that the Form-10 filed by the assessee during reassessment proceedings was also not valid as it contained vari…

Shishya Edutech Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 23(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 7726/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. R.K Pandaassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. Shishya Edutech (P) Ltd. Ito 4346/4-C, 1St Floor, Ansari Vs Ward – 23(2) Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi -02 C/O Shri S. K. Sahpathi House No.579, Sector -16A, Faridabad -121002 Pan No. Aahcs9225R (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. R.K PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s. Shishya Edutech (P) Ltd. ITO 4346/4-C, 1st Floor, Ansari Vs Ward – 23(2) Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi New Delhi -02 C/o Shri S. K. Sahpathi House No.579, Sector -16A, Faridabad -121002 PAN No. AAHCS9225R (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. P. C. Yadav, Advocate Respondent by Sh. S. L. Anuragi, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 20/02/2019 Date of Pronouncement: 01/04/2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the 1. order dated 16.10.20…

M/S. Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, Faridabad

In the result, ground nos

ITA 2841/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri G.D.Agrawal & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv, Miss Umang Luthra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…ITA No. 2841 & 2840/D/2015 Assessment year 2009-10, 2008-09 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.-2840-41/Del/2015 (Assessment Year: 2008-09, 2009-10) Asian Colour Coated Ispat Vs. DCIT Cent. Circle II Ltd. Faridabad 403, Nirmal Tower, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi PAN : AAFCA1873K Appellant Respondent Assessee by: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv, Miss Umang Luthra, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Goyal, CA. Revenue by : Shri J.K.Mishra, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 08.01.2019 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2019 ORDER PER SUD…

M/S. Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, Faridabad

In the result, ground nos

ITA 2840/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri G.D.Agrawal & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv, Miss Umang Luthra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…ITA No. 2841 & 2840/D/2015 Assessment year 2009-10, 2008-09 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.-2840-41/Del/2015 (Assessment Year: 2008-09, 2009-10) Asian Colour Coated Ispat Vs. DCIT Cent. Circle II Ltd. Faridabad 403, Nirmal Tower, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi PAN : AAFCA1873K Appellant Respondent Assessee by: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv, Miss Umang Luthra, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Goyal, CA. Revenue by : Shri J.K.Mishra, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 08.01.2019 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2019 ORDER PER SUD…

M/S. Neelkanth Town Planners Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2943/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year : 2005-06

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Madhur AggarwalFor Respondent: Sh. Surender Pal, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2005-06 NEELKANTH TOWN PLANNERS Vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI G-36, 2ND FLOOR, OUTER CIRCLE, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI – 110 001 (PAN: AAACN2742D) (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Madhur Aggarwal, Sh. R.P. Mall, Advocates Department by : Sh. Surender Pal, Sr. DR. ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-29, New Delhi on 07.04.2…

Pushp Steels & Mining (P) Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 20(2), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 6094/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Feb 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR) &
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153(1)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 PUSHP STEELS & MINING (P) LTD. Vs. ITO, WARD 20(2), 751, KUNDEWALAN STREET, NEW DELHI AJMERI GATE, DELHI – 110 006 (PAN: AADCP2925K) (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta, CA Department by : Smt. Sulekha Verma, CIT(DR) & Sh. Surender Pal, Sr. DR. ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi on 12.09.2018 in relation to the assessment yea…

Billo, Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 1(2), Meerut

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3817/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2010-11 Smt.Billo, Vs. Ito, C/O Kapil Goel, Advocate, Ward-1(2), F-26/124, Sector-7, Meerut. Rohini. Pan: Bakpb9355A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kapil Goel, Advocate Revenue By : Shri D.S. Rawat, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 11.10.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.12.2018 Order

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Rawat, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2010-11 Smt.Billo, Vs. ITO, C/o Kapil Goel, Advocate, Ward-1(2), F-26/124, Sector-7, Meerut. Rohini. PAN: BAKPB9355A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Kapil Goel, Advocate Revenue by : Shri D.S. Rawat, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 11.10.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 12.12.2018 ORDER This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 19th March, 2018 of the CIT(A), Meerut, relating to Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a…