Goodyear India Ltd. v. ITO

118 TTJ 467High Court1994#7742 most cited
15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Also reported as

207 ITR 813

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Goodyear India Ltd. v. ITO

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 961/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2010-11] Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Vs Dcit, Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, Circle-16(1), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. New Delhi. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2010-11] Dcit, Vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Circle-16(1), Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, New Delhi. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv. & Ms. Tejasvi Jain & Ms. Somya Jain, Ca Respondent By Shri G.C.Srivastava, Adv., Shri Kalrav Mehrotra, Adv. & Shri Mayank Patawari, Ca Date Of Hearing 11.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2023

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 43Section 43B

…advantage in the capital field. Apart from submission made earlier that the appellant was a mere licensee, entitled to use the technical know-how of SMC. Reliance in this regard was placed on the following judicial pronouncements:- * CIT vs Avery India Ltd. 207 ITR 813 (Cal.); * Praga Tools Ltd. vs CIT 123 ITR 773 (FB)(AP); * CIT vs Tata Engineering Ltd. 1123 ITR 538 (Bom); * Trivenii Engineering Works Ltd. vs CIT 136 ITR 340 (Del.); * ACIT vs SHama Engine Valves Ltd. 138 ITR 216 (Del.); * CIT vs J.K.Synthetics Ltd. 176 Taxman 355 (Del.) and other case laws. 47.1. Therefore, he prayed that the AO should be dire…

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1507/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2010-11] Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Vs Dcit, Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, Circle-16(1), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. New Delhi. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2010-11] Dcit, Vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Circle-16(1), Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, New Delhi. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv. & Ms. Tejasvi Jain & Ms. Somya Jain, Ca Respondent By Shri G.C.Srivastava, Adv., Shri Kalrav Mehrotra, Adv. & Shri Mayank Patawari, Ca Date Of Hearing 11.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2023

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 43Section 43B

…advantage in the capital field. Apart from submission made earlier that the appellant was a mere licensee, entitled to use the technical know-how of SMC. Reliance in this regard was placed on the following judicial pronouncements:- * CIT vs Avery India Ltd. 207 ITR 813 (Cal.); * Praga Tools Ltd. vs CIT 123 ITR 773 (FB)(AP); * CIT vs Tata Engineering Ltd. 1123 ITR 538 (Bom); * Trivenii Engineering Works Ltd. vs CIT 136 ITR 340 (Del.); * ACIT vs SHama Engine Valves Ltd. 138 ITR 216 (Del.); * CIT vs J.K.Synthetics Ltd. 176 Taxman 355 (Del.) and other case laws. 47.1. Therefore, he prayed that the AO should be dire…