Dresser-Rand India (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT

13 Taxmann.com 82High Court2011#2688 most cited

What is Dresser-Rand India (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT authority for?

An Assessing Officer cannot disregard an assessee's decision to avail services from associated enterprises, even if the assessee has internal expertise, as the determination of necessity is the assessee's prerogative. The Transfer Pricing Officer's role is to determine the arm's length price, not the need for the service itself.

43

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Dresser-Rand India (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT · section 92CA · intra group services · cost contribution charges · associated enterprise · arm's length price · benchmarking analysis · transactional net margin method · most appropriate method · taxpayer prerogative

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Dresser-Rand India (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT

M/S. Ingersoll - Rand Technologies and Services Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2499/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 2499/Bang/2019 Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/S. Ingersoll-Rand Technologies & Services Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant 8Th Floor, Tower D, Commissioner Of Ibc Knowledge Park, Income Tax, No. 4/1, Bannerghatta Circle 3(1)(1), Main Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 029. Pan: Aaaci2961B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ankur Pai, Advocate : Smt. S. Praveena, Cit Dr Revenue By Date Of Hearing : 04-11-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 04-01-2023 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal By The Assessee Has Been Filed By Assessee Against The Order Dated 11/10/2019 Passed By The Ld.Acit, Circle-3 (1)(1), Bangalore Relating To Assessment Year 2015-16 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. Order Is Bad In Law & On Facts 1.1 The Order Passed By Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle - 3(1)(1) ["Learned Ao"] Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ["The Act"] Is Bad In Law & On Facts & Therefore, Liable To Be Set Aside.

For Appellant: Shri Ankur Pai, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 43BSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 2499/Bang/2019 Assessment Year : 2015-16 M/s. Ingersoll-Rand Technologies and Services Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant 8th Floor, Tower D, Commissioner of IBC Knowledge Park, Income Tax, No. 4/1, Bannerghatta Circle 3(1)(1), Main Road, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 029. PAN: AAACI2961B APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Ankur Pai, Advocate : Smt. S. Praveena, CIT DR Revenue by Date of Hearing : 04-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 04-01-2023 ORDER PER BEENA PILL…

Lite-on Mobile India Private Limited, Kancheepuram vs. DCIT, Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment

ITA 478/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.3194 & 478/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2012-13) M/S. Lite-On Mobile India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Nokia Telecom Special Economic Zone, Income Tax, Plot No.1A, Sipcot Industrial Park, Corporate Circle-4(1) Phase-Iii Chennai-Bangalore Highway, Chennai-600 034. Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram Dist. Pin- 602 105. Pan: Aadcp 9246K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. B.Jayaraghavan, CIT
Section 92CSection 92C(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी धु"वु" आर.एल रे"डी, "या"यक सद!य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद!य के सम' BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.3194 & 478/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2012-13) M/s. Lite-on Mobile India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Nokia Telecom Special Economic Zone, Income Tax, Plot No.1A, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Corporate Circle-4(1) Phase-III Chennai-Bangalore Highway, Chennai-600 034. Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram Dist. PIN- 60…

Lite-on Mobile India Private Limited, Kancheepuram vs. DCIT Corporate Circle 4(1), Chennai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment

ITA 3194/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.3194 & 478/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2012-13) M/S. Lite-On Mobile India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Nokia Telecom Special Economic Zone, Income Tax, Plot No.1A, Sipcot Industrial Park, Corporate Circle-4(1) Phase-Iii Chennai-Bangalore Highway, Chennai-600 034. Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram Dist. Pin- 602 105. Pan: Aadcp 9246K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. B.Jayaraghavan, CIT
Section 92CSection 92C(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी धु"वु" आर.एल रे"डी, "या"यक सद!य एवं "ी जी.मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद!य के सम' BEFORE SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.3194 & 478/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2012-13) M/s. Lite-on Mobile India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Nokia Telecom Special Economic Zone, Income Tax, Plot No.1A, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Corporate Circle-4(1) Phase-III Chennai-Bangalore Highway, Chennai-600 034. Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram Dist. PIN- 60…

M/S. Waters (India) Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 7(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 are partly allowed

ITA 2617/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am It(Tp)A No.2616/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2010-2011 It(Tp)A No.2617/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2011-2012 M/S.Waters (India) Private Limited The Dy.Commissioner Of No.36A, 2Nd Phase, Income-Tax, Circle 12(5) V. Bangalore. Peenya Industrial Area Bengaluru – 560 058. Pan : Aaacw1411C. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Smt.G.Vaidehi, Adovcate Respondent By : Sri.Priyardarshi Mishra, Addl.Cit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 01.10.2021 Date Of Hearing : 28.09.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm These Appeals At The Instance Of The Assessee Are Directed Against Two Orders Of The Cit(A), Both Dated 30.10.2019. The Relevant Assessment Years Are 2010-2011 & 2011-2012. Common Issues Are Raised In These Appeals, Hence, They Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Smt.G.Vaidehi, AdovcateFor Respondent: Sri.Priyardarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT-DR
Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM and Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM IT(TP)A No.2616/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2010-2011 IT(TP)A No.2617/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2011-2012 M/s.Waters (India) Private Limited The Dy.Commissioner of No.36A, 2nd Phase, Income-tax, Circle 12(5) v. Bangalore. Peenya Industrial Area Bengaluru – 560 058. PAN : AAACW1411C. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Smt.G.Vaidehi, Adovcate Respondent by : Sri.Priyardarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 01.10.2021 Date of Hearing : 28.09.2021 O R D E R Per George George K, JM T…

Dresser-Rand India (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (13 Taxmann.com 82) — Cited in 43 Judgments | BharatTax