DCIT, Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai v. Viraj Profiles Limited

64 Taxmann.com 52Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2015#2657 most cited

What is DCIT, Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai v. Viraj Profiles Limited authority for?

Expenditure disallowed under Section 14A must be added back to the book profit for the purpose of computing Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) under Section 115JB.

44

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

DCIT v. Viraj Profiles Limited · Viraj Profiles · Section 115JB · Section 14A · book profit · MAT computation · disallowance for exempt income · add back expenditure · ITAT Mumbai

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DCIT, Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai v. Viraj Profiles Limited

SMITA CONDUCTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. CIRCLE 3(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 63/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Smita Conductors Circle 3(3)(1) Private Limited Aayakar Bhavan, 1402/03, 1402/3, Maharshi Karve Rd, Vs. Raheja Centre, New Marine Lines, Free Press Road, Churchgate- 400020. Nariman Point- 400021. Pan: Aaacs5379K (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Sunil Hirawat, A.R. Revenue By : Shri P. D. Chougule (Addl. Cit), Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 27 . 05 . 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 30 . 05 . 2024 O R D E R Per: Ratnesh Nandan Sahay: 1. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Appellant Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit Appeal Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Act In Short) Vide Its Order No. Itba/ Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1058749394(1) Dated 14/12/2023 For Assessment Year 2018- 19. 2. Following Grounds Of Appeal Have Been Raised:

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Hirawat, A.RFor Respondent: Shri P. D. Chougule (Addl. CIT), Sr. D.R
Section 10(34)Section 10(38)Section 115JSection 14ASection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/s. Smita Conductors Circle 3(3)(1) Private Limited Aayakar Bhavan, 1402/03, 1402/3, Maharshi Karve Rd, Vs. Raheja Centre, New Marine Lines, Free Press Road, Churchgate- 400020. Nariman Point- 400021. PAN: AAACS5379K (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Sunil Hirawat, A.R. Revenue by : Shri P. D. Chougule (Addl. CIT), Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 27 . 05 . 2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30 . 05 . 2024 O R D E R Per: Ratn…

WHEELS INDIA LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU 1 CHENNAI, CHENNAI

ITA 2772/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2701/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2702/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit M/S. Wheels India Pvt. Ltd. बनाम Large Taxpayer Unit-2 21, Pattulos Road, / Vs. Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 002. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-0315-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2771/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2772/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S.Wheels India Pvt.Ltd. Acit बनाम 21, Pattulos Road, Large Taxpayer Unit-2 / Vs. Chennai-600 002. Chennai-600 034. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-0315-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri R.Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri S.Senthil Kumaran (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11-07-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14-07-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri R.Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri S.Senthil Kumaran (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iii)

…CIT(A) has erred and held that the disallowance u/s 14A cannot be added in the book profit u/s 115JB of the I.T. Act. 4.2 The learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the ruling in the case of DCIT Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai Vs Viraj Profiles Limited in 64 Taxmann.com 52(2015) (Mumbai- Trib) wherein it was held that AO has rightly disallowed the expenditure u/s 14A of the Act read with Rule 60 of the Income Tax Rules for computing book profit u/s. 115JB(2) of the Act read with clause (f) to Explanation to Section 115JB(2) of the Act.” The same are adjudicated as under. 9. Loss on restatement of foreign cur…

WHEELS INDIA LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU 1 CHENNAI, CHENNAI

ITA 2771/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2701/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2702/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) Acit M/S. Wheels India Pvt. Ltd. बनाम Large Taxpayer Unit-2 21, Pattulos Road, / Vs. Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 002. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-0315-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2771/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16) & आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.2772/Chny/2019 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/S.Wheels India Pvt.Ltd. Acit बनाम 21, Pattulos Road, Large Taxpayer Unit-2 / Vs. Chennai-600 002. Chennai-600 034. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacw-0315-K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri R.Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Revenue By : Shri S.Senthil Kumaran (Cit)- Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11-07-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 14-07-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri R.Vijayaraghavan (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri S.Senthil Kumaran (CIT)- Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iii)

…CIT(A) has erred and held that the disallowance u/s 14A cannot be added in the book profit u/s 115JB of the I.T. Act. 4.2 The learned CIT(A) has failed to appreciate the ruling in the case of DCIT Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai Vs Viraj Profiles Limited in 64 Taxmann.com 52(2015) (Mumbai- Trib) wherein it was held that AO has rightly disallowed the expenditure u/s 14A of the Act read with Rule 60 of the Income Tax Rules for computing book profit u/s. 115JB(2) of the Act read with clause (f) to Explanation to Section 115JB(2) of the Act.” The same are adjudicated as under. 9. Loss on restatement of foreign cur…

Showing 120 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

DCIT, Central Circle 18 and 19, Mumbai v. Viraj Profiles Limited (64 Taxmann.com 52) — Cited in 44 Judgments | BharatTax