CIT v. Shriram Investments (Firm)

54 Taxmann.com 15High Court2015#21171 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Judgments citing CIT v. Shriram Investments (Firm)

SHRIRAM INVESTMENTS,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 995/CHNY/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jul 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.995/Chny/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2013-2014. Shriram Investments, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No.4, Lady Desika Road, Non Corporate Circle 2, Mylapore, Chennai. Chennai 600 004. [Pan Aaafs 2590M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. N. Gopinath, IRS, JCIT
Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘ B’ BENCH : CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी अ"ाहम पी. जॉज", लेखा सद"य के सम" । [BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.995/CHNY/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment year : 2013-2014. Shriram Investments, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No.4, Lady Desika Road, Non Corporate Circle 2, Mylapore, Chennai. Chennai 600 004. [PAN AAAFS 2590M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. R. Sivaraman, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर…

CIT v. Shriram Investments (Firm) (54 Taxmann.com 15) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax