CIT v. K Abdu & Co.

170 Taxmann 297High Court2008#5689 most cited
20

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Sections most often in play

Judgments citing CIT v. K Abdu & Co.

SMT BIMALA BALA MONDAL,BURDWAN vs. ITO, WD-1(4), DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR

In the result the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 794/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Sept 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Hon’Ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, Jm] I.T.A No. 794/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Smt. Bimala Bala Mondal -Vs.- I.T.O., Ward-1(4) Burdwan Durgapur [Pan : Aeapm 9753 N] ] (Respondent) (Appellant) For The Appellant : None For The Respondent : Shri.Ambitab Bhattacharya Jcit Date Of Hearing : 23.08.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 02.09.2016. Order This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 5.2.2014 Of Cit(A)- Durgapur, Relating To Ay 2010-11. 2. The Assessee Is An Individual. He Is A Dealer In Country Spirits. Purchases Are Made From A Single Party Namely Ifb Agro Industries Ltd.. The Assessee In Respect Of Purchases From Ifb Agro Industries Ltd. Made A Payment Of Rs.14,31,840/- In Cash. According To The Ao The Above Payment Made Cannot Be Allowed As Deduction In Computing The Total Income Of The Assessee Because Of The Violation Of The Provision Of Section 40A(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act). The Action Of The Ao Was Confirmed By Cit(A). 3. Aggrieved By The Order Of Cit(A) The Assessee Has Preferred An Appeal Before This Tribunal. 4. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Asseseee Nor Was Any Request For Adjournment Made. I Have Heard The Submissions Of The Ld. Dr. Identical Issue With Regard To The Disallowance U/S 40A(3) Of The Act In The Case Of Assessee Who Are Engaged In The Business Of Country Spirits Who Have Paid Purchases In Cash Had Come Up For Consideration Before This Bench In The Case Of Ramnagar Pachwai & C.S. (Shop) Vs Ito Vide Ita No.148/Kol/2015 & 185&186/Kol/2014 For A.Y.2007-08 & 2008-09

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri.Ambitab Bhattacharya JCIT
Section 22Section 40A(3)Section 85Section 86

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH : KOLKATA [Before Hon’ble Sri N.V.Vasudevan, JM] I.T.A No. 794/Kol/2014 Assessment Year : 2010-11 Smt. Bimala Bala Mondal -vs.- I.T.O., Ward-1(4) Burdwan Durgapur [PAN : AEAPM 9753 N] ] (Respondent) (Appellant) For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri.Ambitab Bhattacharya JCIT Date of Hearing : 23.08.2016 Date of Pronouncement : 02.09.2016. ORDER This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order dated 5.2.2014 of CIT(A)- Durgapur, relating to AY 2010-11. 2. The Assessee is an individual. He is a dealer in country spirits. Purchases are made from a…

CIT v. K Abdu & Co. (170 Taxmann 297) — Cited in 20 Judgments | BharatTax