CIT v. Herbalife International India (P.) Ltd.
384 ITR 276High Court2016#4836 most cited
What is CIT v. Herbalife International India (P.) Ltd. authority for?
Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for payments to a US resident is not permissible if it imposes harsher conditions than those applicable to payments made to an Indian resident, due to the non-discrimination clause in the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
25
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v Herbalife International India · Section 40(a)(i) · Article 26(3) India-US DTAA · non-discrimination clause · deductibility of payments to non-residents · DTAA more beneficial than Income Tax Act
Also reported as
69 Taxmann.com 205
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Herbalife International India (P.) Ltd.
Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2