Bank of India v. ACIT
What is Bank of India v. ACIT authority for?
Expenditure that relates to a continuous flow of expenditure, even if technically treated as prior period expenses, is eligible for deduction if the conditions for deduction are met. Disallowance is not justified if the revenue cannot prove that the right to receive or the obligation to pay arose in a prior year, or that bills were raised in a prior year, and the expenses were incurred for the assessee's business.
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Bank of India v. ACIT · prior period expenses · continuous flow of expenditure · deduction of expenses · Section 14A · Section 36(1)(vii) · Section 115JB · Section 143(3) · Section 244A · Section 250 · Section 36(1)(iii) · Section 36(1)(viia)
Also reported as
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Bank of India v. ACIT
Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2