Bank of India v. ACIT

122 Taxmann.com 247Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2020#4015 most cited

What is Bank of India v. ACIT authority for?

Expenditure that relates to a continuous flow of expenditure, even if technically treated as prior period expenses, is eligible for deduction if the conditions for deduction are met. Disallowance is not justified if the revenue cannot prove that the right to receive or the obligation to pay arose in a prior year, or that bills were raised in a prior year, and the expenses were incurred for the assessee's business.

30

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Bank of India v. ACIT · prior period expenses · continuous flow of expenditure · deduction of expenses · Section 14A · Section 36(1)(vii) · Section 115JB · Section 143(3) · Section 244A · Section 250 · Section 36(1)(iii) · Section 36(1)(viia)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Bank of India v. ACIT

ACIT CIR 2(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. BANK OF BARODA, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2777/MUM/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singhshri Sandeep Singh Karhailbank Of Baroda, C-26, G-Block, Baroda Corporate Centre, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. ……………. Appellant Pan: Aaacb 1534 F V/S Acit, 2(1)(1), ……………. Respondent Mumbai-400051. Acit, Circle - 2(1)(1), Room No. 561, 5Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, ……………. Appellant Mumbai-400020. V/S Bank Of Baroda, C-26, G-Block, Baroda Corporate Centre, Bandra ……………. Respondent Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. Pan: Aaacb 1534 F

For Appellant: Mr. C. NareshFor Respondent: Mr. Kailash C. Kanojiya, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 250

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER Bank of Baroda, C-26, G-Block, Baroda Corporate Centre, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. ……………. Appellant PAN: AAACB 1534 F v/s ACIT, 2(1)(1), ……………. Respondent Mumbai-400051. ACIT, Circle - 2(1)(1), Room No. 561, 5th floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, ……………. Appellant Mumbai-400020. v/s Bank of Baroda, C-26, G-Block, Baroda Corporate Centre, Bandra ……………. Respondent Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051. PAN: AAACB 1534 F Assessee by : Mr. C. Nar…

ACIT-2(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ICICI BANK LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed while for the appeal of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 3864/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalicici Bank Limited Vs. The Acit, Circle 2(3)(2) Icici Bank Towers Aayakar Bhavan, 5Th Bandra Kurla Complex Floor, Room No. 552/556 Bandra (East) Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaaci1195H Appellant .. Respondent The Acit, Circle 2(3)(2) Vs. Icici Bank Limited Aayakar Bhavan, 5Th Icici Bank Towers Floor, Room No. 552 Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai – 400 020 Bandra (East) Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaaci1195H Respondent .. Appellant

For Appellant: Aarti VisanjiFor Respondent: R.A. Dhyani &
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 43D

…ITA Nos. 3215 & 3864/Mum/2019 1 ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. The ACIT-2(3)(2) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Ms. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ICICI Bank Limited Vs. The ACIT, Circle 2(3)(2) ICICI Bank Towers Aayakar Bhavan, 5th Bandra Kurla Complex Floor, Room No. 552/556 Bandra (East) Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 400 051 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ PAN/GIR No: AAACI1195H Appellant .. Respondent The ACIT, Circle 2(3)(2) Vs. ICICI Bank Limited Aayakar Bhavan, 5th ICICI Bank Towers Floor, Room No. 552 Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai – 400 020 Bandra (…

Showing 120 of 30 · Page 1 of 2