Ajay Gupta v. CIT
114 Taxmann.com 577High Court2020#5584 most cited
What is Ajay Gupta v. CIT authority for?
Presumption under section 132(4A) is not absolute and cannot be the sole basis for addition; additions require corroborative evidence linking seized documents to the assessee's undisclosed income.
21
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Ajay Gupta v CIT · section 132(4A) · presumption · corroborative evidence · loose papers · search and seizure · undisclosed income · addition · assessment order
Also reported as
185 DTR 217